'Arbitration'

Judge shoots down Verizon customer class action suit

By: |Aug 25th, 2011 at 10:15PM
Filed Under: Legal, Mobile
4

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia has ruled that Verizon customers who take issue with “fraudulent” cell phone charges must arbitrate individually with the carrier instead of filing a class-action lawsuit in court, Reuters recently reported. A group of current and former Verizon Wireless customers originally filed a class-action lawsuit arguing that it was “unconscionable” for Verizon Wireless to require customers to arbitrate any unfair charges in their contracts. ...

Customers sue AT&T to block T-Mobile acquisition

By: |Jul 22nd, 2011 at 03:00PM
Filed Under: Business, Carriers - US
57

A handful of AT&T’s customers are now fighting against its planned acquisition of T-Mobile. Law firm Bursor & Fisher filed lawsuits against AT&T on behalf of 11 AT&T subscribers in an effort to block the merger, AllThingsD reported on Friday. The lawyers have created a pitch site titled FightTheMerger.com and argue that The Clayton Antitrust Act gives “anyone who may be affected by a proposed merger” the power to sue in a federal court. “Government enforcement is an importa...

Sprint, Clearwire to enter arbitration over out-of-network Evo, Epic handsets

By: |Nov 11th, 2010 at 10:22AM
Filed Under: Carriers - US
50

FierceWireless is reporting that U.S. wireless carrier Sprint and its WiMAX-network partner Clearwire have entered arbitration over the monthly rate the latter company charges for WiMAX enabled smartphones on its network. Currently, around 810,000 Epic and Evo handset owners use their device in areas where Clearwire’s service is unavailable. Despite this fact, the WiMAX network provider continues to charge Sprint a monthly fee for the devices existence.According to the report, Sprint filed for arbitrat...

AT&T ammends arbitration clause; do you get a free pass?

By: |May 9th, 2009 at 01:08PM
Filed Under: AT&T, Services
27

We’ve received a flurry of emails over the past few weeks questioning whether or not AT&T will let people out of contracts ETF-free due to substantial changes to its terms and conditions. First it was a series of changes to permissable data service usage and more recently AT&T has amended its arbitration clause to limit a customer’s right to sue, in theory at least. Common sense might suggest that changes these drastic would result in a window of opportunity, during which time customers ma...