<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; Customer Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 19:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon adding remote diagnostics tool to devices; no Carrier IQ-like spying features included</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/20/verizon-adding-carrier-iq-like-remote-diagnostics-tool-to-various-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/20/verizon-adding-carrier-iq-like-remote-diagnostics-tool-to-various-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrier IQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Remote Diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=132584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been just over three months since the Carrier IQ &#8220;spygate&#8221; epidemic engulfed the mobile world. As smartphones and tablets become more powerful, consumers are becoming even more concerned with their mobile privacy as numerous smartphones have been found to track users&#8217; locations, phone calls, text messages and even which websites they visit. While the companies that used Carrier IQ&#8217;s tracking software claimed it was for diagnostic purposes, the service was promptly removed from &#8220;infected&#8221; handsets. Verizon, which never used Carrier IQ, in the past two days has updated two Android handsets to include a new &#8220;Remote Diagnostics&#8221; tool, which some fear may be the next big privacy concern. Read on for more. Both the LG Revolution and DROID Charge received small updates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/20/verizon-adding-carrier-iq-like-remote-diagnostics-tool-to-various-devices"><img class="size-large wp-image-119051 aligncenter" title="verizonwireless" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/verizonwireless-645x442.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="442" /></a></center>
<p>It has been just over three months since <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/01/carrier-installed-carrier-iq-spyware-found-in-android-ios-should-we-panic-video/">the Carrier IQ &#8220;spygate&#8221; epidemic engulfed the mobile world</a>. As smartphones and tablets become more powerful, consumers are becoming even more concerned with their mobile privacy as numerous smartphones have been found to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/20/apple-recording-storing-gps-position-of-iphone-3g-ipad-users-video/">track users&#8217; locations</a>, phone calls, text messages and even which websites they visit. While the companies that used Carrier IQ&#8217;s tracking software claimed it was for diagnostic purposes, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/16/sprint-we-have-disabled-carrier-iq-and-we-are-no-longer-collecting-data/">the service was promptly removed from &#8220;infected&#8221; handsets</a>. Verizon, which never used Carrier IQ, in the past two days has updated two Android handsets to include a new &#8220;Remote Diagnostics&#8221; tool, which some fear may be the next big privacy concern. Read on for more.<span id="more-132584"></span></p>
<p>Both the <a href="http://support.verizonwireless.com/pdf/system_update/revolution.pdf">LG Revolution</a> and <a href="http://support.verizonwireless.com/pdf/system_update/droid_charge.pdf">DROID Charge</a> received small updates that included, among bug fixes, a new feature that would deliver &#8220;enhanced customer support with Verizon Remote Diagnostics.&#8221; Verizon claims the tool will improve customer service and will be used when a customer calls the carrier for customer support. Then, with the customer’s permission it will allow a customer service representative to remotely view a user’s device for &#8220;device training, application demonstrations and troubleshooting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unlike Carrier IQ, however, the software &#8220;does not run in the background.&#8221; And while the software cannot be removed from a device, Verizon spokesman Albert Aydin told BGR that &#8220;it only runs when a customer calls support and gives permission to use it.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The tool will not run unless a customer gives explicit permission during a call with customer support,&#8221; Aydin confirmed. &#8220;If customer support suggests using the tool as a way to diagnose a problem the customer will see a notification on their device after customer support initiates the Verizon Remote Diagnostics tool. A customer will then see a permission request directly on their device along with &#8216;terms and conditions&#8217; and an &#8216;Accept&#8217; or &#8216;Reject&#8217; button. A customer will need to select &#8216;Accept&#8217; in order for the tool to run. Customers are free to select &#8216;Reject&#8217; and the tool will not run.&#8221;</p>
<p>Verizon is planning to add the new Remote Diagnostics utility to more smartphones this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/20/verizon-adding-carrier-iq-like-remote-diagnostics-tool-to-various-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/verizonwireless-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/verizonwireless-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon explains locked bootloader stance in letter to FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locked Bootloader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unlocked bootloaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=129948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a response to the FCC following a formal complaint, Verizon Wireless has outlined the company&#8217;s policy on locked bootloaders. An irate Droid-Life reader became fed up with the carrier&#8217;s consistent locking of bootloaders on its flagship devices and decided to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. The reader claimed Verizon&#8217;s policy was in violation of the &#8220;Block C license,&#8221; an agreement the company made when it purchased its 700MHz LTE spectrum. Within the agreement, it is stated that Verizon should not be allowed to &#8220;lock a phone,&#8221; which many interpreted as a statement that should include a phone&#8217;s bootloader. Read on for more and a copy of Verizon&#8217;s letter. Verizon claims that it &#8220;has established a standard of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/01/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc"><img class="size-full wp-image-99334 aligncenter" title="verizon-building" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/verizon-building.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="309" /></a></center>
<p>In a response to the FCC following a formal complaint, Verizon Wireless has outlined the company&#8217;s policy on locked bootloaders. An irate <em>Droid-Life</em> reader became fed up with the carrier&#8217;s consistent locking of bootloaders on its flagship devices and decided to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. The reader claimed Verizon&#8217;s policy was in violation of the &#8220;Block C license,&#8221; an agreement the company made when it purchased its 700MHz LTE spectrum. Within the agreement, it is stated that Verizon should not be allowed to &#8220;lock a phone,&#8221; which many interpreted as a statement that should include a phone&#8217;s bootloader. Read on for more and a copy of Verizon&#8217;s letter. <span id="more-129948"></span></p>
<p>Verizon claims that it &#8220;has established a standard of excellence in customer experience with our branded devices&#8221; and &#8220;an open bootloader could prevent Verizon Wireless from providing the same level of customer experience and support because it would allow users to change the phone or otherwise modify the software and potentially, negatively impact how the phone connects with the network.&#8221; The carrier&#8217;s policy is to provide the best solution &#8220;for as many customers as possible” and as we&#8217;ve suggested, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/iconfess-why-an-android-fan-recommends-the-iphone/">most consumers likely don’t care about rooting, ROMs or the concept of being &#8220;open.&#8221;</a> They just want a sleek smartphone that works.</p>
<center><img class="size-large wp-image-129964 aligncenter" title="verizon-fcc-bootloader1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-645x899.png" alt="" width="645" height="899" /></center>
<p><a href="http://www.droid-life.com/2012/02/29/letter-from-verizon-to-fcc-details-their-stance-on-bootloaders/#more-63166">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-128x128.png">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-128x128.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon receives high marks for customer service while Zappos falls in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/amazon-receives-high-marks-for-customer-service-while-zappos-falls-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/amazon-receives-high-marks-for-customer-service-while-zappos-falls-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zappos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon received the highest customer service ratings of any retailer in 2011 according to the NRF Foundations Customers&#8217; Choice survey. The survey, which asked more than 9,000 shoppers which retailer provides the best customer service, was conducted by BIGresearch. In 2011, Amazon gained one spot to become the top-ranked retailer while the company&#8217;s subsidiary Zappos, which was previously ranked No.1, fell to No.3. Coming in behind Amazon was L.L.Bean, gaining a spot from 2010 rank to come in at No.2, with Overstock, QVC, Kohl&#8217;s, Lands’ End, JCPenney, Newegg and Nordstrom rounding out the top-10. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/amazon-receives-high-marks-for-customer-service-while-zappos-falls-in-2011"><img class="size-full wp-image-123186 aligncenter" title="Amazon-Logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Amazon-Logo.png" alt="" width="580" height="290" /></a></center>
<p>Amazon received the highest customer service ratings of any retailer in 2011 according to the NRF Foundations Customers&#8217; Choice survey. The survey, which asked more than 9,000 shoppers which retailer provides the best customer service, was conducted by BIGresearch. In 2011, Amazon gained one spot to become the top-ranked retailer while the company&#8217;s subsidiary Zappos, which was previously ranked No.1, fell to No.3. Coming in behind Amazon was L.L.Bean, gaining a spot from 2010 rank to come in at No.2, with Overstock, QVC, Kohl&#8217;s, Lands’ End, JCPenney, Newegg and Nordstrom rounding out the top-10.<span id="more-123176"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nrffoundation.com/content/customers-choice-awards">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/amazon-receives-high-marks-for-customer-service-while-zappos-falls-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Amazon-Logo-128x128.png">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Amazon-Logo-128x128.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBB: AT&amp;T has lowest complaint rate among major carriers, T-Mobile highest</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/11/bbb-att-has-lowest-complaint-rate-among-major-carriers-t-mobile-highest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/11/bbb-att-has-lowest-complaint-rate-among-major-carriers-t-mobile-highest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.bbb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=112381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the top-four nationwide carriers in the United States, AT&#38;T has managed the lowest ratio of Better Business Bureau complaints to customers over the past three years. Earlier this month, the BBB published data collected between August 2008 and July 2011 for the eight biggest wireless carriers in the U.S. The firm then measured total complaints for each carrier against its approximate total subscriber count according to the CTIA as of July to determine each carrier&#8217;s &#8220;complaint ratio.&#8221; Read on for more. Between August 2008 and this past July, MetroPCS had the lowest number of complaints filed with the BBB with just 997. The regional carrier&#8217;s 9 million subscribers gives it a minuscule complaint ratio of 0.011%, the best among all carriers covered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/11/bbb-att-has-lowest-complaint-rate-among-major-carriers-t-mobile-highest"><img class="size-full wp-image-109087 aligncenter" title="att-sign" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/att-sign.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="432" /></a></center>
<p>Among the top-four nationwide carriers in the United States, AT&amp;T has managed the lowest ratio of Better Business Bureau complaints to customers over the past three years. Earlier this month, the BBB published data collected between August 2008 and July 2011 for the eight biggest wireless carriers in the U.S. The firm then measured total complaints for each carrier against its approximate total subscriber count according to the CTIA as of July to determine each carrier&#8217;s &#8220;complaint ratio.&#8221; Read on for more.<span id="more-112381"></span></p>
<p>Between August 2008 and this past July, MetroPCS had the lowest number of complaints filed with the BBB with just 997. The regional carrier&#8217;s 9 million subscribers gives it a minuscule complaint ratio of 0.011%, the best among all carriers covered in the report. AT&amp;T found itself in second place overall with a complaint ratio of 0.016%. Just 15,178 complaints were filed against the carrier over the three-year period in question, and AT&amp;T&#8217;s complaint ratio was the best among the four major U.S. carriers.</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless was the No. 2 major carrier and fourth overall <a href="http://www.bbb.org/blog/2011/11/cell-phone-service-complaints-are-dropping-but-it-pays-to-shop-around/">according to the BBB</a> with a complaint ratio of 0.020% (20,876 complaints), and Sprint followed in the sixth spot with 0.044% (22,300 complaints). T-Mobile racked up 26,387 complaints over the three-year span and found itself in dead last with a complaint ratio of 0.078%.</p>
<p>Interestingly, carriers&#8217; BBB complaint ratios don&#8217;t appear to correlate closely with the perceived quality of customer service they provide. According to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/28/verizon-wireless-wins-j-d-power-customer-care-award/">a recent poll by J.D. Power and Associates</a>, Verizon Wireless has the best customer service in the country, having scored 770 out of a possible 1,000 points. T-Mobile was second with a score of 766, Sprint was third with 752 and AT&amp;T was scored the worst among major U.S. carriers with 751 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/11/bbb-att-has-lowest-complaint-rate-among-major-carriers-t-mobile-highest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/att-sign-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/att-sign-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell considering using Google+ Hangouts for customer support</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/21/dell-considers-using-google-hangouts-for-customer-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/21/dell-considers-using-google-hangouts-for-customer-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=97103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Dell is toying with the idea of using Google+ Hangouts for Dell&#8217;s customer support. The service allows users to initiate a video chat session with multiple people inside their Google+ circles. &#8220;I am thinking about hangouts for business. Would you like to be able to connect with your Dell service and sale teams via video directly from Dell.com?&#8221; he posted on his Google+ page on Sunday. The idea was an instant success: 556 people had given the comment a +1 as of Tuesday morning and hundreds more left comments in support of the suggestion. As GigaOm points out, it is currently not possible to start a &#8220;Hangout&#8221; session from anywhere but from inside Google+ itself. The social network is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/21/dell-considers-using-google-hangouts-for-customer-support"><img class="size-full wp-image-97104 aligncenter" title="michael-dell1-e1308848555124" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/michael-dell1-e1308848555124110719140937.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="355" /></a></center>
<p>Michael Dell is toying with the idea of using Google+ Hangouts for Dell&#8217;s customer support. The service allows users to initiate a video chat session with multiple people inside their Google+ circles. &#8220;I am thinking about hangouts for business. Would you like to be able to  connect with your Dell service and sale teams via video directly from  Dell.com?&#8221; he posted on his Google+ page on Sunday. The idea was an instant success: 556 people had given the comment a +1 as of Tuesday morning and hundreds more left comments in support of the suggestion. As <em>GigaOm</em> points out, it is currently not possible to start a &#8220;Hangout&#8221; session from anywhere but from inside Google+ itself. The social network is still in a young invite-only phase, too, so some customers would not have access just yet. Still, Google has said that it plans to offer Google+ for businesses, so perhaps Dell&#8217;s idea could come to fruition down the road.<span id="more-97103"></span>[Via <a href="http://gigaom.com/video/dell-google-hangouts/">GigaOm</a>]</p>
<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/100523784851251213675/posts/2mXcBY282jC?hl=en">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/21/dell-considers-using-google-hangouts-for-customer-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/michael-dell1-e1308848555124110719140937-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/michael-dell1-e1308848555124110719140937-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No iPhone 5 this summer according to AT&amp;T rep</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/04/no-iphone-5-this-summer-according-to-att-rep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/04/no-iphone-5-this-summer-according-to-att-rep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5 release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=88050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Customer service representatives, while often very helpful, are rarely solid sources for unannounced information. At the same time, there have been cases in the past where customer service reps have unknowingly shared information that was intended to stay behind closed doors, and we have a feeling this could be one of those cases. According to Apple enthusiast blog MacRumors, an AT&#38;T rep recently confirmed to a subscriber that there will not be a new iPhone launching in June or July this year. The correspondence was initiated when the subscriber noticed his eligibility date for an upgrade was pushed back by five months. He contacted AT&#38;T to determine the reason for the move, and was reportedly told the following: Apple has informed us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/04/no-iphone-5-this-summer-according-to-att-rep"><img class="size-full wp-image-86720 aligncenter" title="iphone-4" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/iphone-4110425124225.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="451" /></a></center>
<p>Customer service representatives, while often very helpful, are rarely solid sources for unannounced information. At the same time, there have been cases in the past where customer service reps have unknowingly shared information that was intended to stay behind closed doors, and we have a feeling this could be one of those cases. According to Apple enthusiast blog <em>MacRumors</em>, an AT&amp;T rep recently confirmed to a subscriber that there will not be a new iPhone launching in June or July this year. The correspondence was initiated when the subscriber noticed his eligibility date for an upgrade was pushed back by five months. He contacted AT&amp;T to determine the reason for the move, and was reportedly told the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apple has informed us that they do not plan to release the iPhone in the June to July timeframe, though there will be a newer version in the future. Unfortunately, we have not been given a release time for the new phone. We will release this information on our website when it is available to us.</p></blockquote>
<p>The news lines up with earlier reports, of course, which state that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/20/reuters-apple-to-ship-iphone-5-in-september/">the iPhone 5 will not launch until September</a> or later. Apple&#8217;s next iPhone will be an incremental update according to rumors, and it will reportedly feature Apple&#8217;s new A5 processor, an 8-megapixel camera and a case similar to the one found on the iPhone 4.<span id="more-88050"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2011/05/04/atandt-rep-apple-has-told-us-no-new-iphone-in-june-or-july/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/04/no-iphone-5-this-summer-according-to-att-rep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/iphone-thumb110504140116-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/iphone-thumb110504140116-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FastCustomer puts waiting on hold, on hold</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/fastcustomer-puts-waiting-on-hold-on-hold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/fastcustomer-puts-waiting-on-hold-on-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fonolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=78898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the more aggravating predicaments gadget fans often find themselves in are the scenarios where devices break or accounts get over-billed and phone calls to customer service must be made. The only sure way to make these situations even more aggravating, of course, is to navigate through a maze of key-presses and then sit on hold for 13 minutes before a call is finally connected. Thankfully, services like FastCustomer look to ease the tension a bit by waiting on hold in place of the user and then and connecting the call only once an operator has picked up the phone. Companies like Fonolo have been trying to tackle the same problem for quite some time, but no other service offers the simple UI and the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/?p=78898"><img class="size-full wp-image-78899 aligncenter" title="FastCustomer-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/FastCustomer-logo110303210056.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="96" /></a></center>
<p>Among the more aggravating predicaments gadget fans often find themselves in are the scenarios where devices break or accounts get over-billed and phone calls to customer service must be made. The only sure way to make these situations even more aggravating, of course, is to navigate through a maze of key-presses and then sit on hold for 13 minutes before a call is finally connected. Thankfully, services like FastCustomer look to ease the tension a bit by waiting on hold in place of the user and then and connecting the call only once an operator has picked up the phone. Companies like Fonolo have been trying to tackle the same problem for quite some time, but no other service offers the simple UI and the smooth user experience FastCustomer affords — input the name of the company you want to reach, key in your phone number, then sit back while the magic happens. FastCustomer&#8217;s Web-based service is completely free for the time being, and it has an app in Apple&#8217;s App Store for $0.99. The company is also looking to connect with an Android developer to build a Google-friendly app, but no word on a time line. Hit the break for a video explaining how FastCustomer works.<span id="more-78898"></span></p>
<center><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="652" height="397" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7WarZoZZZgQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="652" height="397" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7WarZoZZZgQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center>
<p><a href="http://www.fastcustomer.com/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/fastcustomer-puts-waiting-on-hold-on-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/FastCustomer-logo110303210056-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/FastCustomer-logo110303210056-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T responds to Consumer Reports beating, cites A+ rating from BBB</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/07/att-responds-to-consumer-reports-beating-cites-a-rating-from-bbb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/07/att-responds-to-consumer-reports-beating-cites-a-rating-from-bbb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.bbb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Business Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=68952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T was dragged over the coals yesterday following the revelation that Consumer Reports readers think AT&#38;T is the worst carrier in the U.S. The bruised carrier issued a statement shortly after Consumer Reports&#8217; survey made the rounds, but it was pretty obvious that it had more in store. Today, AT&#38;T points out that according to the Better Business Bureau (BBB), its network is the best in the country — 0r, at least, its subscribers complain the least. In the 12-month period ending December 3rd, 2010, AT&#38;T had the lowest number of complaints made to the BBB among the top four cellular carriers in the country. Verizon Wireless had 34% more complaints during that time frame, Sprint had 115% more complaints]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/07/att-responds-to-consumer-reports-beating-cites-a-rating-from-bbb"><img class="size-full wp-image-68953 aligncenter" title="att-bbb-complaints" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/att-bbb-complaints.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="347" /></a></center>
<p>AT&amp;T was dragged over the coals yesterday following the revelation that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/06/att-is-the-worst-carrier-in-the-u-s-according-to-consumer-reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em> readers think AT&amp;T is the worst carrier in the U.S.</a> The bruised carrier issued a statement shortly after Consumer Reports&#8217; survey made the rounds, but it was pretty obvious that it had more in store. Today, AT&amp;T points out that according to the <em>Better Business Bureau</em> (<em>BBB</em>), its network is the best in the country — 0r, at least, its subscribers complain the least. In the 12-month period ending December 3rd, 2010, AT&amp;T had the lowest number of complaints made to the <em>BBB</em> among the top four cellular carriers in the country. Verizon Wireless had 34% more complaints during that time frame, Sprint had 115% more complaints and T-Mobile had 207% more complaints. AT&amp;T also says it has an A+ average rating nationally from the <em>BBB</em>, having received 107 A+ ratings, seven A ratings and one A- rating from local <em>BBBs</em> across the country. Hit the jump for the full press release.<span id="more-68952"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>AT&amp;T Mobility Rated A+ Nationally On Average by Better Business Bureau</strong><br />
<em><strong></strong></em></p>
<p><em>AT&amp;T Mobility records fewest number of complaints, receives lowest complaint rate among peers over the last 12 months</em><br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Dallas</strong>, <strong>Texas</strong>, <strong>December 07, 2010</strong></p>
<p>Over the past year, <a title="AT&amp;T Mobility " href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/welcome/index.jsp">AT&amp;T Mobility</a> has recorded the fewest number of <a title="Better Business Bureau" href="http://www.bbb.org/">Better Business Bureau</a> (BBB) complaints and received <a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=6209&amp;cat=20&amp;u=1378">the lowest BBB complaint rate</a> among the four largest national wireless carriers, contributing to an average national rating of A.[1]</p>
<p>For complaints closed within the last 12 months as of Dec. 3, 2010,  AT&amp;T Mobility’s nearest competitor had 32 percent more BBB  complaints and its largest competitor had 62 percent more complaints.  However, the best way to compare industry peers is by complaint rate,  which is calculated by the number of closed complaints per wireless  provider subscriber.[2] Using this method, AT&amp;T Mobility’s largest  competitor had a complaint rate 34 percent higher, and the complaint  rate of its two other industry peers were two times and three times  more, respectively.</p>
<p>Wireless customers in the U.S. file more core customer issue  complaints related to carrier advertising and marketing, contract-early  terminated, service related issues, and billing and rates with the  various BBBs each year than they do with any other entity.[3]</p>
<p>Earlier this year, AT&amp;T Mobility announced that it was the only  company in America to achieve separate ‘A’ ratings and separate  accreditations from every BBB in the U.S. on their report cards for  ethical business practices and responsiveness to customers concerns.  These rankings are based on BBB confidence that the business is  operating in an open and trustworthy manner. Each business undergoes an  evaluation in 17 categories including BBB accreditation, how well the  company has responded to consumer concerns, the company’s complaint  history with the BBB, and the truthfulness of its advertising claims.</p>
<p><sup>1</sup> As of Dec. 3, 2010, AT&amp;T was rated A+ by 100 local BBBs, A by 7 local BBBs and A- by 1 local BBBs.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup> Rate determined by the aggregate number of closed  complaints per company as listed on Dec. 3, 2010 on the 108 local BBB  Web sites divided by the average quarterly total of reported retail  postpaid/retail prepaid subscribers (which does not include connected  device and wholesale customers) per company over the last four reported  quarters.</p>
<p><sup>3</sup> In 2009, the BBB received 36,086 complaints while the  FCC received 18,989 complaints relating to Carrier Advertising and  Marketing, Contract-Early Termination, Service Related Issues, and  Billing and Rates. The FCC also received 47,902 Telecommunication  Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) complaints against wireless carriers  which stem from unsolicited text messages and voice calls. Excluding  these non-core customer issue complaints, there are roughly twice the  number of wireless complaints filed with BBBs as opposed to the FCC.</p>
<p>*AT&amp;T products and services are provided or  offered by subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&amp;T Inc. under the  AT&amp;T brand and not by AT&amp;T Inc.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=18826&amp;cdvn=news&amp;newsarticleid=31420&amp;mapcode=corporate|financial">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/07/att-responds-to-consumer-reports-beating-cites-a-rating-from-bbb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/att-bbb-complaints-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/att-bbb-complaints-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile USA rated best in customer service</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/07/29/t-mobile-usa-rated-best-in-customer-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/07/29/t-mobile-usa-rated-best-in-customer-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S. Geller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=57333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one thing T-Mobile USA is known for, it&#8217;s solid customer service. J.D. Power and Associates found this out as well, as they have just announced that T-Mobile USA is the sole highest-ranking wireless provider in &#8220;Overall Customer Care Performance.&#8221; Congrats, T-Mobile. Now if you could only expand coverage and launch some kick-ass devices&#8230; Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.jdpower.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-22385 aligncenter" title="t-mobile-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/t-mobile-logo.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="73" /></a></center>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing T-Mobile USA is known for, it&#8217;s solid customer service. J.D. Power and Associates found this out as well, as they have just announced that T-Mobile USA is the sole highest-ranking wireless provider in &#8220;Overall Customer Care Performance.&#8221; Congrats, T-Mobile. Now if you could only expand coverage and launch some kick-ass devices&#8230;<span id="more-57333"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdpower.com">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/07/29/t-mobile-usa-rated-best-in-customer-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/t-mobile-logo-80x73.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/t-mobile-logo-80x73.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fonolo: A Chainsaw for Phone Trees</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/08/01/fonolo-a-chainsaw-for-phone-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/08/01/fonolo-a-chainsaw-for-phone-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fonolo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=4464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now this is a service we can get behind! Fonolo serves one purpose and one purpose alone: Kill phone trees. If you&#8217;re not familiar with the term &#8220;phone tree&#8221; you&#8217;ll certainly be familiar with the concept. When something you own isn&#8217;t working properly despite your best efforts, you get angry. You pride yourself in being a skilled gadgeteer so the fact that you can&#8217;t fix the problem yourself is a bit enraging. Now you have to swallow your pride, cowboy up and call the dreaded &#8220;customer care line&#8221;. After dialing, are you greeted with a knowledgeable human? Of course not. A digitized female voice simply makes matters worse by asking you all kinds of questions and requiring you to push]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.fonolo.com"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4465 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="fonolo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/fonolo.jpg" alt="" width="222" height="85" /></a></center>
<p>Now this is a service we can get behind! Fonolo serves one purpose and one purpose alone: Kill phone trees. If you&#8217;re not familiar with the term &#8220;phone tree&#8221; you&#8217;ll certainly be familiar with the concept. When something you own isn&#8217;t working properly despite your best efforts, you get angry. You pride yourself in being a skilled gadgeteer so the fact that you can&#8217;t fix the problem yourself is a bit enraging. Now you have to swallow your pride, cowboy up and call the dreaded &#8220;customer care line&#8221;. After dialing, are you greeted with a knowledgeable human? Of course not. A digitized female voice simply makes matters worse by asking you all kinds of questions and requiring you to push various buttons for a few minutes before you have the pleasure of sitting on hold for half an hour. Ugh. There is hope though, and that hope is fonolo.com. Fonolo provides you with flow charts for each company in its data base. The flow charts represent each and every option that you would have if you called the customer service line yourself. Simply select a point on the chart (likely &#8220;speak with a customer service rep&#8221; down near the bottom) and Fonolo will call the company for you. It will automatically navigate the menus and then ring your phone once it has reached the point you specified. Best of all, it&#8217;s free! There are also some other cool options such as the ability to record calls and publish them online to give others a taste of what they can expect should they need to call the same company. The catch? It&#8217;s currently in private beta. You can enter your email on the homepage to be notified as soon as they&#8217;re ready for you and we highly recommend doing so. This is the kind of service worth waiting for.</p>
<p>[Thanks Robby]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fonolo.com">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/08/01/fonolo-a-chainsaw-for-phone-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/fonolo-150x85.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/fonolo-150x85.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-05-31 16:00:19 -->
