<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; Desktops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/desktops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canalys: Smartphone shipments surpassed PC shipments in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphone shipments overtook client PC shipments for the first time in 2011, according to new data from market research firm Canalys. Vendors shipped a total of 158.5 million smartphones in the fourth quarter, representing a 57% increase compared to the 101.2 million units shipped in the same quarter a year earlier. Shipments for the full year of 2011 rose 63% to 487.7 million units, up from 299.7 million shipped in 2010. The PC market only grew 15% to 414.6 million units in 2011, which included an astonishing 274% increase in tablet shipments — tablets accounted for 15% of all PC shipments last year according to Canalys. The firm expects growth in the smartphone market to slow in 2012, with vendors putting more focus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-overtake-tablets-desktops-and-laptops-in-2011"><img class="size-full wp-image-125660 aligncenter" title="Smartphones-PCs" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="282" /></a></p>
<p>Smartphone shipments overtook client PC shipments for the first time in 2011, according to new data from market research firm Canalys. Vendors shipped a total of 158.5 million smartphones in the fourth quarter, representing a 57% increase compared to the 101.2 million units shipped in the same quarter a year earlier. Shipments for the full year of 2011 rose 63% to 487.7 million units, up from 299.7 million shipped in 2010. The PC market only grew 15% to 414.6 million units in 2011, which included an astonishing 274% increase in tablet shipments — tablets accounted for 15% of all PC shipments last year according to Canalys. The firm expects growth in the smartphone market to slow in 2012, with vendors putting more focus on profitability. Canalys&#8217;s press release follows below.</p>
<p><span id="more-125645"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Smart phones overtake client PCs in 2011</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>      Vendors shipped 488 million smart phones in 2011, compared to 415 million client PCs</li>
<li>      Apple was the leading smart phone vendor in 2011, following record Q4 shipments</li>
</ul>
<p>Palo Alto, Shanghai, Singapore and Reading – 3 February 2012</p>
<p>Canalys today released its full, detailed Q4 2011 country-level smart phone shipment estimates to clients, so completing the picture for the year. One notable result was that total annual global shipments of smart phones exceeded those of client PCs (including pads) for the first time.</p>
<p>Vendors shipped 158.5 million smart phones in Q4 2011, up 57% on the 101.2 million units shipped in Q4 2010. This bumper quarter took total global shipments for the whole of 2011 to 488.0 million units, up 63% on the 299.7 million smart phones shipped throughout 2010. By comparison, the global client PC market grew 15% in 2011 to 414.6 million units, with 274% growth in pad shipments. Pads accounted for 15% of all client PC shipments in 2011.</p>
<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-overtake-tablets-desktops-and-laptops-in-2011"><img class="aligncenter" title="Smartphones-PCs" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="282" /></a></center>
<p>“In 2011 we saw a fall in demand for netbooks, and slowing demand for notebooks and desktops as a direct result of rising interest in pads,” said Chris Jones, Canalys VP and Principal Analyst. “But pads have had negligible impact on smart phone volumes and markets across the globe have seen persistent and substantial growth through 2011. Smart phone shipments overtaking those of client PCs should be seen as a significant milestone. In the space of a few years, smart phones have grown from being a niche product segment at the high-end of the mobile phone market to becoming a truly mass-market proposition. The greater availability of smart phones at lower price points has helped tremendously, but there has been a driving trend of increasing consumer appetite for Internet browsing, content consumption and engaging with apps and services on mobile devices.”</p>
<p>However, Canalys expects to see smart phone market growth slow in 2012 as vendors exercise greater cost control and discipline, and put more focus on profitability. Notably, even vendors who have focused on conquering the low-end of the market with aggressive pricing, such as Huawei, ZTE and LG, are now placing greater attention on the higher tiers. Flagship models aimed at raising selling prices and improving margins will feature more heavily this year.</p>
<p>Apple’s impressive end to the year resulted in it becoming the leading smart phone and client PC vendor in Q4 2011, with shipments of 37.0 million iPhones, 15.4 million iPads and 5.2 million Macs. It also smashed the record for the most smart phones shipped globally by any single vendor in one quarter, beating Nokia’s previous record of 28.3 million shipped in Q4 2010. Moreover, Apple’s performance meant that it displaced Nokia, for the first time, as the leading smart phone vendor by annual shipments. Apple shipped 93.1 million iPhones in 2011, representing growth of 96% over 2010. The iPhone 4S benefitted from pent-up demand resulting from the launch coming in October rather than June, but Apple’s overall volume was also buoyed by continued shipments of the now more aggressively priced iPhone 4 and 3GS models.</p>
<p>Samsung also finished 2011 with a flourish. It shipped 35.3 million smart phones in Q4 2011 under its own brand, bringing its total to 91.9 million for the year, compared to just 24.9 million in 2010. This excludes shipments of rebranded products, such as the Nexus S and Galaxy Nexus, which Canalys counts under the Google brand. Samsung continued to spend big on marketing activities, and its strong product portfolio – particularly the Android-based Galaxy S II – performed well.</p>
<p>Despite a disappointing set of financial results, Nokia’s smart phone performance in the fourth quarter gave cause for optimism. It shipped 19.6 million smart phones, down 31% from the record high of a year earlier, but up 17% on Q3 2011. The total was helped by 1.2 million and 0.6 million shipments of its Windows Phone and MeeGo-based products respectively, as well as improved Symbian Belle volumes from competitively priced devices such as the Nokia 500, 700 and 701. Its total smart phone shipments for the year came in at 77.3 million globally.</p>
<p>“Its first Windows Phone products, the Lumia 800 and 710, along with the recently announced Lumia 900 through AT&amp;T in the US, have improved the outlook for Nokia,” said Canalys Senior Analyst, Tim Shepherd. “They are well-designed, competitive devices that demonstrate innovation is still alive within Nokia. But the battle is not over and it has huge challenges ahead. Nokia must continue to build out its Lumia portfolio with devices tailored to address all price points and all the markets in which it aims to compete. It must hasten its transition from Symbian to Windows Phone around the world and, with Microsoft, promote and generate excitement for the platform and new products. And it must succeed in attracting more developers to build high quality, locally relevant apps.”</p>
<p>RIM’s demise in 2011 has been over played by some, with the company ending the year as the fourth largest smart phone vendor and delivering annual unit growth of 5%. “There is no denying that RIM has had a tough year,” said Canalys Principal Analyst, Pete Cunningham. “But when you consider that it is transitioning to a new platform it has done well to increase volume while remaining profitable; the latter point being something that many other vendors struggle with. The appointment of Thorsten Heins as CEO will bring new energy to the company while ensuring that it does not radically deviate from its overall strategy in this transitional year. However, 2012 will become even more competitive and RIM needs BlackBerry 10 devices out there to ensure it retains its status as a major player.”</p>
<center><img class="aligncenter" title="SmartphoneShipments" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SmartphoneShipments-645x300.png" alt="" width="516" height="240" /></center>
<p>At a platform level, Android accounted for 52% of global smart phones shipments in Q4 2011, with iOS representing 23% and Symbian 12%. Android was also the leading smart phone platform by volume for the whole year, accounting for 49% of all devices shipped in 2011 and ahead of iOS with 19% share and Symbian with 16%. Collectively, Android smart phone shipments grew 149% year on year in Q4 2011 to 81.9 million units, resulting in a total of 237.8 million for the full year, up 244% on 2010. Samsung’s success and focus on Android have contributed substantially to the growth of the platform, but other vendors, such as Sony Ericsson, Huawei, Motorola, LG and particularly HTC, have also seen significant growth in their Android volumes over the course of 2011.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global PC market shows growth in Q2; Lenovo wins globally, Apple wins in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/14/global-pc-market-shows-growth-in-q2-lenovo-wins-globally-apple-wins-in-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/14/global-pc-market-shows-growth-in-q2-lenovo-wins-globally-apple-wins-in-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q2 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=96623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market research firms Gartner and IDC have both released preliminary data for global PC sales in the second quarter of 2011, and the reports paint a much improved picture compared to the first quarter of the year. Lenovo was the biggest winner globally in terms of growth according to Gartner, having shipped 10.23 million PCs for a 12% share of the market. The China-based vendor&#8217;s PC market share grew a whopping 22.5% compared to the same quarter a year prior, and Lenovo now finds itself in the No. 3 spot globally. HP was still the top vendor with shipments totaling 14.89 million units, and Dell remained in the No. 2 spot with 10.62 million units shipped. Acer and ASUS rounded out the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/14/global-pc-market-shows-growth-in-q2-lenovo-wins-globally-apple-wins-in-u-s"><img class="size-full wp-image-96624 aligncenter" title="Gartner-PCs-Q2-2011" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Gartner-PCs-Q2-2011110714110810.png" alt="" width="497" height="263" /></a></center>
<p>Market research firms Gartner and IDC have both released preliminary data for global PC sales in the second quarter of 2011, and the reports paint a much improved picture compared to the first quarter of the year. Lenovo was the biggest winner globally in terms of growth according to Gartner, having shipped 10.23 million PCs for a 12% share of the market. The China-based vendor&#8217;s PC market share grew a whopping 22.5% compared to the same quarter a year prior, and Lenovo now finds itself in the No. 3 spot globally. HP was still the top vendor with shipments totaling 14.89 million units, and Dell remained in the No. 2 spot with 10.62 million units shipped. Acer and ASUS rounded out the top-5 with 9.30 million units and 4.47 million units, respectively. Though <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/12/windows-operating-system-share-slides-in-june-while-os-x-ios-continue-to-climb/">Apple&#8217;s operating system share continued to climb last month</a>, the firm still doesn&#8217;t sell enough units to bump it from the &#8220;Others&#8221; category on Gartner&#8217;s global table. In the U.S., however, Apple showed the biggest market share gains last quarter with 8.5% growth over the same quarter last year. While IDC&#8217;s numbers vary compared to Gartner&#8217;s, the end results are the same. IDC has Lenovo&#8217;s global growth pegged at 22.9% over the second quarter last year, and it shows that Apple grew even faster than Gartner estimates with 14.7% growth in the U.S. compared to the same quarter a year prior. The two firms agree that Acer was the biggest loser globally. Acer&#8217;s share of the worldwide PC market was down 20.4% from the second quarter of 2010 according to Gartner, and down a less alarming 10.1% according to IDC. Taiwan-based Acer was the biggest loser in the U.S. as well, as its share was down 22.6% year-over-year according to Gartner and 25.4% according to IDC. Full press releases from both firms follow below.<span id="more-96623"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Gartner Says Worldwide PC Shipments Increased 2.3 Percent in Second Quarter of 2011</strong></p>
<p><em>STAMFORD, Conn., July 13, 2011—</em></p>
<p>Worldwide PC shipments surpassed 85.2 million units in the second quarter of 2011, a 2.3 percent increase from the same period last year, according to preliminary results by Gartner, Inc. These results are below Gartner&#8217;s earlier projection for 6.7 percent growth.</p>
<p>&#8220;After strong growth in shipments of consumer PCs for four years, driven by strong demand for mini-notebooks and low-priced consumer notebooks, the market is shifting to modest, but steady growth, said Mikako Kitagawa, principal analyst at Gartner. “The slow overall growth indicates that the PC market is still in a period of adjustment, which began in the second half of 2010.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Vendor&#8217;s performances have become variable as they have had to deal with significant inventory buildup, changes to their product mix, and the fact that growth has been coming mostly from emerging markets. Vendors are having to shift resources away from mature consumer markets. They are also invested in developing media tablets, many of which launched in the first half of 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p>HP continued to be the worldwide leader, as it accounted for 17.5 percent of worldwide PC shipments in the second quarter of 2011 (see Table 1). The company performed better than average in most regions, but it was pulled down by its performance in Asia/Pacific. Globally, HP achieved solid growth in the professional PC market, but it continued to face challenges in the consumer segment.</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong>1<br />
Preliminary Worldwide PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 2Q11 (Units)</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Company</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10-2Q11 Growth (%)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">HP</td>
<td valign="top">14,888,086</td>
<td valign="top">17.5</td>
<td valign="top">14,454,971</td>
<td valign="top">17.4</td>
<td valign="top">3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dell</td>
<td valign="top">10,621,436</td>
<td valign="top">12.5</td>
<td valign="top">10,283,074</td>
<td valign="top">12.3</td>
<td valign="top">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lenovo</td>
<td valign="top">10,225,358</td>
<td valign="top">12.0</td>
<td valign="top">8,349,272</td>
<td valign="top">10.0</td>
<td valign="top">22.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Acer</td>
<td valign="top">9,298,989</td>
<td valign="top">10.9</td>
<td valign="top">11,689,255</td>
<td valign="top">14.0</td>
<td valign="top">-20.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Asus</td>
<td valign="top">4,467,611</td>
<td valign="top">5.2</td>
<td valign="top">4,306,241</td>
<td valign="top">5.2</td>
<td valign="top">3.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Toshiba</td>
<td valign="top">4,411,400</td>
<td valign="top">5.2</td>
<td valign="top">4,497,576</td>
<td valign="top">5.4</td>
<td valign="top">-1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Others</td>
<td valign="top">31,306,987</td>
<td valign="top">36.7</td>
<td valign="top">29,732,493</td>
<td valign="top">35.7</td>
<td valign="top">5.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>85,219,865</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>83,312,882</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2.3</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs, including mini-notebooks but not media tablets such as the iPad. Final estimates will be subject to change.<br />
Source: Gartner (July 2011)</p>
<p>Dell moved into second place in the worldwide PC market for the first time since the fourth quarter of 2008. Dell did well in Asia/Pacific, where it has invested heavily lately. Professional PC refreshments definitely boosted Dell&#8217;s growth. Lenovo experienced the strongest growth among the top-tier vendors, as shipments increased 22.5 percent. Lenovo achieved strong growth in Asia/Pacific, the U.S. and Latin America with both desktop and mobile PCs.</p>
<p>Acer dropped from No. 2 to the No. 4 position in the worldwide PC market in the second quarter of 2011. It had a great deal of inventory in the distribution channel in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region. Acer&#8217;s problems stemmed from its low-price, high-volume business model, which is no longer effective.</p>
<p>In the U.S., PC shipments totaled 16.9 million units in the second quarter of 2011, a 5.6 percent decline from the second quarter of 2010. The major inhibitor was clearly a weak consumer PC market.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the hype around media tablets such as the iPad, retailers were very conservative in placing orders for PCs. Instead, they wanted to secure space for media tablets. Some PC vendors had to lower their inventory through promotions, while others slimmed their product lines at retailers,&#8221; Ms. Kitagawa said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The professional PC sector was the bright spot in the U.S. market,&#8221; Ms. Kitagawa said. &#8220;Large enterprises were in the middle of their refreshment purchase period, which started last year. Small and midsize businesses (SMBs) were also at the peak of their refreshment periods. Due to budgetary constraints, the public sector had a slow start in the second quarter of 2011, even though the second quarter is typically a period of high PC sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>Based on preliminary results, Apple showed the strongest growth among the top-tier vendors in the U.S., as it climbed from fifth place to third, overtaking Acer and Toshiba (see Table 2). The preliminary findings show Apple&#8217;s performance far exceed the industry average, partly driven by an iMac refreshment that attracted both consumers and buyers in the education sector.</p>
<p><strong>Table 2<br />
Preliminary United States PC Vendor Unit Shipment Estimates for 2Q11 (Units)</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Company</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11-2Q10 Growth (%)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">HP</td>
<td valign="top">4,552,777</td>
<td valign="top">26.9</td>
<td valign="top">4,608,280</td>
<td valign="top">25.7</td>
<td valign="top">-1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dell</td>
<td valign="top">3,821,759</td>
<td valign="top">22.6</td>
<td valign="top">4,236,303</td>
<td valign="top">23.6</td>
<td valign="top">-9.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Apple</td>
<td valign="top">1,814,000</td>
<td valign="top">10.7</td>
<td valign="top">1,671,500</td>
<td valign="top">9.3</td>
<td valign="top">8.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Toshiba</td>
<td valign="top">1,616,400</td>
<td valign="top">9.6</td>
<td valign="top">1,565,000</td>
<td valign="top">8.7</td>
<td valign="top">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Acer</td>
<td valign="top">1,570,257</td>
<td valign="top">9.3</td>
<td valign="top">2,028,284</td>
<td valign="top">11.3</td>
<td valign="top">-22.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Others</td>
<td valign="top">3,539,666</td>
<td valign="top">20.9</td>
<td valign="top">3,803,974</td>
<td valign="top">21.2</td>
<td valign="top">-6.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>16,914,859</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>17,913,341</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>-5.6</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs, including mini-notebooks but not media tablet such as the iPad. Final estimates will be subject to change.<br />
Source: Gartner (July 2011)</p>
<p>PC shipments in EMEA totaled 23.1 million units in the second quarter of 2011, a 4.8 percent decline from the second quarter of 2010 (see Table 3).</p>
<p><strong>Table 3</strong></p>
<p><strong>Preliminary EMEA PC Vend</strong><strong>or Unit Shipment Estimates for 2</strong><strong>Q11 (Units)</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Company</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Shipments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q10 Market Share (%)</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>2Q11-2Q10 Growth (%)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><a name="_Hlk298341477"></a></td>
<td valign="bottom">4,930,934</td>
<td valign="bottom">21.4</td>
<td valign="bottom">4,757,512</td>
<td valign="bottom">19.6</td>
<td valign="bottom">3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Acer</td>
<td valign="bottom">3,255,000</td>
<td valign="bottom">14.1</td>
<td valign="bottom">5,001,106</td>
<td valign="bottom">20.6</td>
<td valign="bottom">-34.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Dell</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,416,497</td>
<td valign="bottom">10.5</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,217,815</td>
<td valign="bottom">9.2</td>
<td valign="bottom">9.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Asus</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,005,809</td>
<td valign="bottom">8.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,054,264</td>
<td valign="bottom">8.5</td>
<td valign="bottom">-2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lenovo</td>
<td valign="bottom">1,333,857</td>
<td valign="bottom">5.8</td>
<td valign="bottom">1,299,758</td>
<td valign="bottom">5.4</td>
<td valign="bottom">2.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Others</td>
<td valign="bottom">9,128,114</td>
<td valign="bottom">39.6</td>
<td valign="bottom">8,901,074</td>
<td valign="bottom">36.7</td>
<td valign="bottom">2.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>23,070,211</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>24,231,529</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>100.0</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>-4.8</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs, including mini-notebooks but not media tablet such as the iPad. Final estimates will be subject to change.</p>
<p>Source: Gartner (July 2011)</p>
<p>“For the second consecutive quarter the PC market in EMEA showed decline,” said Ranjit Atwal, research director at Gartner. “The PC market in the region remained weak due to slow consumer demand and lower sell-in with PC shipments. In addition, high inventory adjustments by Acer worsened the downside view of the market.</p>
<p>The impact of the Acer inventory clearance saw Acer shipments decline 34.9 percent year-on-year, as some 3 million mobile PCs were cleared out of distribution. Acer’s weak performance contributed nearly 55 percent to the decline of the EMEA PC market in the second half of 2011. “If we remove Acer, the EMEA PC market would have showed a 3 percent growth year-on-year,” said Mr. Atwal. “While this may be an impractical view of the market, it is important to separate supply issues of one vendor against the general trends in the market.”</p>
<p>Demand in the professional PC market has picked up as organizations released budgets to migrate aging PCs to Windows 7. Dell in particular seemed to benefit from this upturn in the professional market.</p>
<p>Acer and Asus were the only vendors of the top five vendors ranking to show decline in shipments and market share in the second quarter of 2011. HP retained the No. 1 spot with encouraging growth in the professional PC market. Lenovo’s takeover of Medion did not have any impact on the overall results this quarter but the professional market bolstered the vendor’s growth. Overall shipments of media tablets took place late this quarter and volumes remained low, minimizing any impact of the media tablets for PC substitutions in the second quarter of 2011.</p>
<p>“There is no doubt that the continued weak consumer demand within Western Europe and economic issues in Southern Europe had some impact on consumer confidence across Western Europe,” said Mr. Atwal. “The feedback from retail channels remained pessimistic, especially in most of Southern Europe, with only France and Germany reporting stronger end-of-quarter shipments as channels cleaned out inventory.” Overall growth in the Central and Eastern Europe and the Middle East and Africa markets could not compensate for the weak shipments in Western Europe.</p>
<p>In Asia/Pacific, PC shipments reached 30.5 million units in the second quarter of 2011, a 9.6 percent increase from the same period last year. The PC market continued to grow moderately, cushioned from the volatility in other regions. However, individual market performances were mixed, with indications of channel inventory issues and delivery postponements in some Southeast Asian countries. India showed weaker-than-expected consumer demand, while China&#8217;s PC market grew 10.9 percent year over year. China&#8217;s growth was attributed to the release of pent-up demand for consumer PCs.</p>
<p>The PC market in Latin America grew 15 percent in the second quarter of 2011, as shipments totaled 9.2 million units. Concerns over Brazil&#8217;s overheating economy are abating with news that the country&#8217;s gross domestic product (GDP) for the first quarter of 2011 grew by 1.3 percent. Inflation in May was down from the previous seven months. Able Brazilian PC vendors are trying to expand in response to increased foreign competition. Local vendors are looking to make up for lost growth in their home country by entering foreign markets where multinational PC vendors are unlikely to venture.</p>
<p>PC shipments in Japan grew 5.5 percent in the second quarter of 2011, with shipments reaching 3.9 million units. The biggest contributor to growth in the professional market in the second quarter of 2011 was a supply-side factor. Many of the shipments in the second quarter had been postponed from March due to the earthquake and tsunami. In the consumer segment, demand for PCs to replace desktop PCs was the main driver of growth. All-in-one desktops and notebooks with large screens sold well at retail stores.</p>
<p>These results are preliminary. Final statistics will be available soon to clients of Gartner&#8217;s PC Quarterly Statistics Worldwide by Region program. This program offers a comprehensive and timely picture of the worldwide PC market, allowing product planning, distribution, marketing and sales organizations to keep abreast of key issues and their future implications around the globe. Additional research can be found on the Computing Hardware section on Gartner&#8217;s website at http://www.gartner.com/it/products/research/asset_129157_2395.jsp.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PC Market Returns to Positive Growth in Line with Expectations, Though Gains Remain Small, According to IDC</strong></p>
<p><strong>FRAMINGHAM, Mass., July 13, 2011</strong> – Worldwide PC shipments increased 2.6% in the second quarter of 2011 (2Q11), according to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker. The results are just short of IDC&#8217;s May projections for 2.9% growth and represent a combination of a hangover from the more than 20% growth in the first half of 2010 as well as competition from smartphones, other consumer products and pressure from lackluster economic conditions. As in 1Q11, the United States and Western Europe were among the weaker regions, reflecting constrained demand in more mature markets, while emerging regions &#8211; particularly Latin America and Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan) &#8211; fared better.</p>
<p>&#8220;These preliminary results continue to reflect pressure from competing consumer and business products as well as cautious spending,&#8221; said Jay Chou, senior research analyst with IDC&#8217;s Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker. &#8220;Nevertheless, product refreshes and promotions in the second half of the year as well as easier year-ago data should boost growth in the second half of the year.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The U.S. PC market continued to contract in 2Q11, largely as a result of three factors. The first is an ongoing contraction in the Mini Notebook (Netbook) market and related inventories. The second is the impact of 2Q10&#8242;s difficult-to-sustain 12% growth. And third, demand has softened as corporate buyers continue to focus on increasing share of their IT budget in new IT solutions such as cloud and virtualization, and consumer interest shifts to media tablets,&#8221; says Rajani Singh, research analyst, United States Quarterly PC Tracker. &#8220;Given the weakness of 2H10, we expect a better market environment in 2H11 with mid-single digit growth rates in the third quarter&#8217;s back to school and fourth quarter&#8217;s holiday season.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Regional Outlook</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>United States</strong> – With a decline of 4.2% year over year, the market was still downcast from a combination of exuberant consumption a year ago and a tenuous economic recovery, but the quarter also marked substantial growth from 1Q11, and total shipments topped over 17.8 million.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA)</strong> – The EMEA PC market continued to contract in 2Q11, in line with IDC&#8217;s forecast, as sustained high levels of inventory prevented stronger sell-in, particularly in Western Europe, where budget cannibalization from media tablets and smartphones continued to contribute to weak consumer demand and slow stock depletion. However, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the Middle East and Africa (MEA) continued to expand and enjoyed positive growth overall.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>J</strong><strong>apan</strong> – The impact of the earthquake on PC buying proved to be limited, thus the market produced stronger results than expected, with 3% growth. Many commercial projects commenced as earlier fears of inventory shortage did not materialize. Coupled with continued average selling price (ASP) declines since the beginning of 2011, consumer shipments also fared better than expected.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan)</strong> – returned to double-digit growth of just over 12% as the market came in slightly above forecasts. A weak consumer market weighed down India, but other key markets like China continued their momentum to help offset this, despite the ongoing inflation challenges there.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Vendor Outlook -</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>HP</strong> grew 3% compared to the second quarter of 2010. The vendor saw good growth in key emerging markets and also EMEA, but also had a slight drop in volume compared to the previous quarter.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Dell</strong> saw growth of 2.8% worldwide. It managed to slow the pace of declines in key markets compared to the first quarter, with good gains in key emerging markets.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Lenovo </strong>outpaced Acer Group to become the number 3 vendor worldwide. It continued to reap the results of its channel expansion in markets outside of Asia/Pacific, garnering notable gains in the U.S. and Japan. All regions saw positive growth and total volume increased by nearly 23% on the year.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Acer</strong> shipments continued to decline from a year ago, but at a slower pace than in the first quarter as the company was affected by a review of inventory handling, as well uncertainties from its recent management shake-up.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>ASUS </strong>grew 6% to overtake Toshiba for the number 5 spot. While the vendor has had some difficulties adjusting for the decline in Mini Notebook PCs, it mainstream notebooks did well, especially in emerging markets.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Top 5 Vendors, Worldwide PC Shipments, Second Quarter 2011 (Preliminary)</h3>
<p><strong>(Units Shipments are in thousands) </strong></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Rank</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Vendor</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q11</p>
<p></strong><strong>Shipments</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Market</p>
<p></strong><strong>Share</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q10</p>
<p></strong><strong>Shipments</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Market</p>
<p></strong><strong>Share</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q11/2Q10</p>
<p></strong><strong>Growth</strong><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">HP</td>
<td valign="top">15,263</td>
<td valign="top">18.1%</td>
<td valign="top">14,823</td>
<td valign="top">18.0%</td>
<td valign="top">3.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2</td>
<td valign="top">Dell</td>
<td valign="top">10,927</td>
<td valign="top">12.9%</td>
<td valign="top">10,626</td>
<td valign="top">12.9%</td>
<td valign="top">2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3</td>
<td valign="top">Lenovo</td>
<td valign="top">10,276</td>
<td valign="top">12.2%</td>
<td valign="top">8,363</td>
<td valign="top">10.2%</td>
<td valign="top">22.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4</td>
<td valign="top">Acer Group</td>
<td valign="top">9,160</td>
<td valign="top">10.9%</td>
<td valign="top">10,190</td>
<td valign="top">12.4%</td>
<td valign="top">-10.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5</td>
<td valign="top">ASUS</td>
<td valign="top">4,468</td>
<td valign="top">5.3%</td>
<td valign="top">4,216</td>
<td valign="top">5.1%</td>
<td valign="top">6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top">Others</td>
<td valign="top">34,320</td>
<td valign="top">40.7%</td>
<td valign="top">34,070</td>
<td valign="top">41.4%</td>
<td valign="top">0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top">All Vendors</td>
<td valign="top">84,413</td>
<td valign="top">100.0%</td>
<td valign="top">82,289</td>
<td valign="top">100.0%</td>
<td valign="top">2.6%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> IDC Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, July 13, 2011</p>
<p>Table notes follow the last table</p>
<h3>Top 5 Vendors, United States PC Shipments, Second Quarter 2011 (Preliminary)</h3>
<p><strong>(Units Shipments are in thousands) </strong></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Rank</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Vendor</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q11</p>
<p></strong><strong>Shipments</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Market</p>
<p></strong><strong>Share</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q10</p>
<p></strong><strong>Shipments</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Market</p>
<p></strong><strong>Share</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2Q11/2Q10</p>
<p></strong><strong>Growth</strong><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1</td>
<td valign="top">HP</td>
<td valign="top">4,692</td>
<td valign="top">26.3%</td>
<td valign="top">4,721</td>
<td valign="top">25.3%</td>
<td valign="top">-0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2</td>
<td valign="top">Dell</td>
<td valign="top">3,959</td>
<td valign="top">22.2%</td>
<td valign="top">4,408</td>
<td valign="top">23.7%</td>
<td valign="top">-10.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3</td>
<td valign="top">Apple</td>
<td valign="top">1,917</td>
<td valign="top">10.7%</td>
<td valign="top">1,671</td>
<td valign="top">9.0%</td>
<td valign="top">14.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4</td>
<td valign="top">Toshiba</td>
<td valign="top">1,617</td>
<td valign="top">9.1%</td>
<td valign="top">1,560</td>
<td valign="top">8.4%</td>
<td valign="top">3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5</td>
<td valign="top">Acer Group</td>
<td valign="top">1,513</td>
<td valign="top">8.5%</td>
<td valign="top">2,028</td>
<td valign="top">10.9%</td>
<td valign="top">-25.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top">Others</td>
<td valign="top">4,159</td>
<td valign="top">23.3%</td>
<td valign="top">4,243</td>
<td valign="top">22.8%</td>
<td valign="top">-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top">All Vendors</td>
<td valign="top">17,857</td>
<td valign="top">100.0%</td>
<td valign="top">18,632</td>
<td valign="top">100.0%</td>
<td valign="top">-4.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Source: </strong>IDC Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, July 13, 2011</p>
<p><strong>Table Notes:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Some IDC estimates prior to financial earnings reports.</li>
<li>Shipments include shipments to distribution channels or end users. OEM sales are counted under the vendor/brand under which they are sold.</li>
</ul>
<li>PCs include Desktops, Portables, Mini Notebooks and do not include handhelds, x86 Servers and Media Tablets (i.e. iPad and Android-based Tablets). Data for all vendors are reported for calendar periods.</li>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/14/global-pc-market-shows-growth-in-q2-lenovo-wins-globally-apple-wins-in-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Gartner-PCs-Q2-2011110714110810-80x80.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Windows 7 license sales reach 400 million</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/12/microsoft-windows-7-license-sales-reach-400-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/12/microsoft-windows-7-license-sales-reach-400-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=96296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During his Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference keynote on Monday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced that the company has now sold 400 million Windows 7 licenses to date. Microsoft&#8217;s current operating system was first launched in October 2009, and it was welcomed with open arms as customers were eager to dump Vista following its troubled introduction. Despite an impressive 20 months for Windows 7, it is still far from being the world&#8217;s most used operating system. Windows XP&#8217;s share was near double Windows 7&#8242;s in June, though Microsoft did confirm on Monday that it would stop supporting the operating system 1,000 days from now. According to Net Applications, Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 7 operating system was used on 27.13% of the world&#8217;s personal computing devices as of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/12/microsoft-windows-7-license-sales-reach-400-million"><img class="size-full wp-image-90821 aligncenter" title="steve-ballmer 2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/steve-ballmer-2110525131806.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="398" /></a></center>
<p>During his Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference keynote on Monday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced that the company has now sold 400 million Windows 7 licenses to date. Microsoft&#8217;s current operating system was first launched in October 2009, and it was welcomed with open arms as customers were eager to dump Vista following its troubled introduction. Despite an impressive 20 months for Windows 7, it is still far from being the world&#8217;s most used operating system. Windows XP&#8217;s share was near double Windows 7&#8242;s in June, though Microsoft did confirm on Monday that it would stop supporting the operating system 1,000 days from now. According to Net Applications, Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 7 operating system was used on 27.13% of the world&#8217;s personal computing devices as of June 2011. Windows XP still ranked No. 1 with 51.13% and Vista occupied the No. 3 spot with 9.52%.</p>
<p><span id="more-96296"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/windows/b/bloggingwindows/archive/2011/07/11/400-million-windows-7-licenses-sold.aspx">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/12/microsoft-windows-7-license-sales-reach-400-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/steve-ballmer-2110525131806-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOS vs. Android: Which mobile OS is more secure?</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/28/ios-vs-android-which-mobile-os-is-more-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/28/ios-vs-android-which-mobile-os-is-more-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 2.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gingerbread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honeycomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=95041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new independent study by security experts at Symantec attempted to measure how secure Apple&#8217;s iOS and Google&#8217;s Android platform are, and also to determine how these mobile platforms stack up against desktop operating systems. Symantec claims that these mobile platforms are much more secure than today&#8217;s popular desktop operating systems, though the firm does note that the key variable, as always, is the human element. “Today’s mobile devices are a mixed bag when it comes to security,” said Carey Nachenberg, Symantec Fellow and Chief Architect, in a statement. “While more secure than traditional PCs, these platforms are still vulnerable to many traditional attacks. Moreover, enterprise employees are increasingly using unmanaged, personal devices to access sensitive enterprise resources, and then connecting these]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/28/ios-vs-android-which-mobile-os-is-more-secure"><img class="size-full wp-image-95043 aligncenter" title="security" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/security110628151442.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="434" /></a></center>
<p><span>A new independent study by security experts at <span>Symantec</span> attempted to measure how secure Apple&#8217;s <span>iOS</span> and <span>Google&#8217;s</span> Android platform are, and also to determine how these mobile platforms stack up against desktop operating systems. </span><span><span>Symantec</span> claims that these mobile platforms are much more secure than today&#8217;s popular desktop operating systems, though the firm does note that the key variable, as always, is the human element. “Today’s mobile devices are a mixed bag when it comes to security,” said Carey <span>Nachenberg</span>, <span>Symantec</span> Fellow and Chief Architect, in a statement. “While more secure than traditional PCs, these platforms are still vulnerable to many traditional attacks. Moreover, enterprise employees are increasingly using <span>unmanaged</span>, personal devices to access sensitive enterprise resources, and then connecting these devices to 3rd-party services outside of the governance of the enterprise, potentially exposing key assets to attackers.” While <span>Symantec</span> neglects to reach a firm conclusion regarding which mobile OS is the most secure, the firm definitely seems to favor <span>iOS</span> more often than not. It says iOS&#8217; app screening procedure plays a big role in the operating system&#8217;s security, and it also says the platform&#8217;s architecture makes it better at resisting <span>malware</span> attacks and data integrity attacks. It also says <span>iOS</span> offers better encryption and more secure access control for apps. <span>Symantec&#8217;s</span> full press release follows below.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-95041"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span><span>Symantec</span> Analysis of Apple’s <span>iOS</span> and Google’s Android Platform Cites Improved Security over PCs, but Major Gaps Remain</span></strong></p>
<p><em>The mass adoption of both consumer and managed mobile devices exposes enterprises to new security risks</em></p>
<p><strong>MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – June 28, 2011</strong><span> – <span>Symantec</span> Corp. (<span>Nasdaq</span>: SYMC) today announced the publication of “</span><a href="http://bit.ly/iZceu4"><span>A Window into Mobile Device Security: Examining the security approaches employed in Apple’s <span>iOS</span> and Google’s Android</span></a><span>” (PDF). This <span>whitepaper</span> conducts an in-depth, technical evaluation of the two predominant mobile platforms, Apple’s <span>iOS</span> and Google’s Android, in an effort to help corporations understand the security risks of deploying these devices in the enterprise.</span></p>
<p>Chief among the findings is that while the most popular mobile platforms in use today were designed with security in mind, these provisions are not always sufficient to protect sensitive enterprise assets that regularly find their way onto devices. Complicating matters, today’s mobile devices are increasingly being connected to and synchronized with an entire ecosystem of 3rd-party cloud and desktop-based services outside the enterprise’s control, potentially exposing key enterprise assets to increased risk.</p>
<p><span>The paper offers a detailed analysis of the security models employed by Apple’s <span>iOS</span> and Google’s Android platforms, evaluating each platform’s effectiveness against today’s major threats, including:</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Web-based and network-based attacks</li>
<li><span><span>Malware</span></span></li>
<li>Social engineering attacks</li>
<li>Resource and service availability abuse</li>
<li>Malicious and unintentional data loss</li>
<li>Attacks on the integrity of the device’s data</li>
</ul>
<p>This analysis has led to some important conclusions:</p>
<ul>
<li><span>While offering improved security over traditional desktop-based operating systems, both <span>iOS</span> and Android are still vulnerable to many existing categories of attacks.</span></li>
<li><span><span>iOS’s</span> security model offers strong protection against traditional <span>malware</span>, primarily due to Apple’s rigorous app certification process and their developer certification process, which vets the identity of each software author and weeds out attackers.</span></li>
<li><span>Google has opted for a less rigorous certification model, permitting any software developer to create and release apps anonymously, without inspection. This lack of certification has arguably led to today’s increasing volume of Android-specific <span>malware</span>.</span></li>
<li><span>Users of both Android and <span>iOS</span> devices regularly synchronize their devices with 3rd-party cloud services (e.g., web-based calendars) and with their home desktop computers. This can potentially expose sensitive enterprise data stored on these devices to systems outside the governance of the enterprise..</span></li>
<li><span>So-called “<span>jailbroken</span>” devices, or devices whose security has been disabled, offer attractive targets for attackers since these devices are every bit as vulnerable as traditional PCs.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Quotes:</strong></p>
<p><span>“Today’s mobile devices are a mixed bag when it comes to security,” said Carey <span>Nachenberg</span>, <span>Symantec</span> Fellow and Chief Architect, <span>Symantec</span> Security Technology and Response. “While more secure than traditional PCs, these platforms are still vulnerable to many traditional attacks. Moreover, enterprise employees are increasingly using <span>unmanaged</span>, personal devices to access sensitive enterprise resources, and then connecting these devices to 3rd-party services outside of the governance of the enterprise, potentially exposing key assets to attackers.”</span></p>
<p><strong>About Security Technology and Response</strong></p>
<p><span>The Security Technology and Response (STAR) organization, which includes Security Response, is a worldwide team of security engineers, threat analysts and researchers that provides the underlying functionality, content and support for all <span>Symantec</span> corporate and consumer security products. With Response centers located throughout the world, STAR monitors malicious code reports from more than 130 million systems across the Internet, receives data from 240,000 network sensors in more than 200 countries and tracks more than 25,000 vulnerabilities affecting more than 55,000 technologies from more than 8,000 vendors. The team uses this vast intelligence to develop and deliver the world’s most comprehensive security protection.</span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/28/ios-vs-android-which-mobile-os-is-more-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/security110628151442-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad, tablets clearly disrupting PC market, survey finds</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/12/ipad-tablets-clearly-disrupting-pc-market-survey-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/12/ipad-tablets-clearly-disrupting-pc-market-survey-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdMob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=84787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey conducted recently by Google-owned AdMob found that tablets are eating into the quality time U.S. consumers spend with their desktop and laptop PCs — and the majority of tablet owners might not use their devices the way many pundits believe. A survey of 1,430 tablet owners in the U.S. conducted March of this year suggests that the most popular use for tablets at this point could be gaming. An overwhelming 84% of respondents said they use their tablets for playing games of some type, while 78% said they searched for information on their tablets and 74% said they used email. Another indication tablets could be as disruptive as many analysts believe is the fact that 43% of those]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/11/ipad-tablets-used-mostly-for-gaming-survey-finds"><img class="size-full wp-image-84793 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-gaming" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ipad-2-gaming110411195704.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="261" /></a></center>
<p>A survey conducted recently by Google-owned AdMob found that tablets are eating into the quality time U.S. consumers spend with their desktop and laptop PCs — and the majority of tablet owners might not use their devices the way many pundits believe. A survey of 1,430 tablet owners in the U.S. conducted March of this year suggests that the most popular use for tablets at this point could be gaming. An overwhelming 84% of respondents said they use their tablets for playing games of some type, while 78% said they searched for information on their tablets and 74% said they used email. Another indication tablets could be as disruptive as many analysts believe is the fact that 43% of those surveyed said they use their tablets more than than their desktop or laptop computers, and 33% said they spent more time with their tablet than they spend watching television. 77% of respondents said their use of traditional computers has decreased since buying a tablet, and 28% said the tablet is now their primary computer.<span id="more-84787"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://googlemobileads.blogspot.com/2011/04/tablets-are-changing-way-consumers.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/12/ipad-tablets-clearly-disrupting-pc-market-survey-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ipad-2-gaming110411195704-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple working on Spaces-like feature for iPad, patent suggests</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/01/apple-working-on-spaces-like-feature-for-ipad-patent-suggests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/01/apple-working-on-spaces-like-feature-for-ipad-patent-suggests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=83645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to patent filings discovered by Patently Apple, Cupertino-based tech company Apple may be working to bring a Spaces-like feature to its iPad tablet. Spaces, which first debuted in Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) back in 2007, allows users to manage multiple, virtual desktops to aid window organization and management — the feature has been standard in a handful of various Linux window environments for nearly a decade. It is unclear if the function will be used as a card-based application switcher, like the ones found on webOS and the BlackBerry PlayBook; as a true, multi-desktop, multi-tasking application; or if this is just another one of those things Apple decided to patent just in case. Either way, the feature looks interesting&#8230; we]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/01/apple-working-on-spaces-like-feature-for-ipad-patent-suggests"><img class="size-medium wp-image-83647 aligncenter" title="iPad Spaces" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-01-at-4.37.42-PM110401203804-645x443.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="443" /></a></center>
<p>According to patent filings discovered by <em>Patently Apple</em>, Cupertino-based tech company Apple may be working to bring a Spaces-like feature to its iPad tablet. Spaces, which first debuted in Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) back in 2007, allows users to manage multiple, virtual desktops to aid window organization and management — the feature has been standard in a handful of various Linux window environments for nearly a decade. It is unclear if the function will be used as a card-based application switcher, like the ones found on webOS and the BlackBerry PlayBook; as a true, multi-desktop, multi-tasking application; or if this is just another one of those things Apple decided to patent <em>just in case</em>. Either way, the feature looks interesting&#8230; we wouldn&#8217;t be opposed other tablet operating systems manufacturers re-engineering a feature like this for their own OS.<span id="more-83645"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2011/03/patent-shows-that-apple-is-bringing-spaces-to-the-ipad.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/01/apple-working-on-spaces-like-feature-for-ipad-patent-suggests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-01-at-4.37.42-PM110401203804-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor suggests HP considered selling PC business [updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/10/rumor-suggests-hp-considered-selling-pc-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/10/rumor-suggests-hp-considered-selling-pc-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DigiTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=79581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new rumor suggests HP may have considered selling its PC business, with Samsung lined up as the most likely buyer. The report comes from DigiTimes and is sourced from an article in the Chinese financial paper Commercial Times. DigiTimes claims that rumors to this effect have been circulating in Taiwan since last year, however, and suggests that a sale is no longer on the table. Citing sources from upstream component makers, the report claims &#8220;the deal was called off due to an unknown reason, and there has not been any follow up since then.&#8221; The original report also noted that Lenovo was a possible buyer and even suggests Foxconn might have shown interest in the business. HP has aggressive plans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/10/rumor-suggests-hp-considered-selling-pc-business"><img class="size-full wp-image-79583 aligncenter" title="hp-laptop" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hp-laptop110310185009.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="481" /></a></center>
<p>A new rumor suggests HP may have considered selling its PC business, with Samsung lined up as the most likely buyer. The report comes from <em>DigiTimes</em> and is sourced from an article in the Chinese financial paper <em>Commercial Times</em>. <em>DigiTimes</em> claims that rumors to this effect have been circulating in Taiwan since last year, however, and suggests that a sale is no longer on the table. Citing sources from upstream component makers, the report claims &#8220;the deal was called off due to an unknown reason, and there has not been any follow up since then.&#8221; The original report also noted that Lenovo was a possible buyer and even suggests Foxconn might have shown interest in the business. HP has aggressive plans to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/09/webos-on-every-pc-starting-next-year-says-hp-ceo/">include webOS on every PC it sells</a> beginning next year. With such an incredible in-road to users, it would seem odd for HP to even briefly consider selling off its PC business.</p>
<p>UPDATE: HP issued the following statement on Thursday regarding the <em>Commercial Times</em> report: &#8220;Irresponsible reporting by Taiwan&#8217;s Commercial Times, suggesting that HP might sell its PC business, should be dismissed as market rumor and speculation. HP runs the world&#8217;s largest PC business and it is core to HP’s strategy for the connected world.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-79581"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20110310PD205.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/10/rumor-suggests-hp-considered-selling-pc-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hp-laptop110310185009-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDC predicts PC shipments to grow 20% in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/16/idc-predicts-pc-shipments-to-grow-20-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/16/idc-predicts-pc-shipments-to-grow-20-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bettiol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=52439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to market research firm IDC, 2010 will see shipments of PCs rebound in 2010 and erase the terrible sales figures seen in 2009. Overall sales are expected to rise 19.8% YoY with a total of 354.8 million units shipped. Notebook sales are anticipated to be the largest contributor to higher sales with growth targeted at 28.6% versus the 8.2% of desktops. As for netbooks, previously said by many to be the next big thing in personal computing, IDC believes that their sales will max out at 12% before tapering off. Why? Because everyone seems to want a tablet instead. [Via Electronista] Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P20"><img class="size-full wp-image-52440 aligncenter" title="icd-pc-shipments-2010" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/icd-pc-shipments-2010.png" alt="icd-pc-shipments-2010" width="409" height="303" /></a></center>
<p>According to market research firm IDC, 2010 will see shipments of PCs rebound in 2010 and erase the terrible sales figures seen in 2009. Overall sales are expected to rise 19.8% YoY with a total of 354.8 million units shipped. Notebook sales are anticipated to be the largest contributor to higher sales with growth targeted at 28.6% versus the 8.2% of desktops. As for netbooks, previously said by many to be the next big thing in personal computing, IDC believes that their sales will max out at 12% before tapering off. Why? Because everyone seems to want a tablet instead.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/06/15/idc.sees.pcs.reach.new.high.laptops.edge.desktops/">Electronista</a>]<span id="more-52439"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P20">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/16/idc-predicts-pc-shipments-to-grow-20-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/icd-pc-shipments-2010-80x80.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac mini refresh just around the bend?</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/04/mac-mini-refresh-just-around-the-bend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/04/mac-mini-refresh-just-around-the-bend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bettiol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=51380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you or anyone you know were planning on picking up a Mac mini over the weekend (don&#8217;t laugh, we&#8217;re serious), you might want to hold off because AppleInsider has it on good authority that the teensy weensy computer rig is due for a refresh in the coming weeks. AI is reporting that multiple independent sources who order Mac minis in large quantities were either instructed to order only what is urgently needed or wait a few weeks. One educational institution had its order fulfilment estimate changed from several days to June 14th. Two months ago AI reported that prototype Mac mini&#8217;s spotted by Apple employees had the DVI port swapped out for a HDMI port and the inclusion of NVIDIA&#8217;s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/03/apples_supply_of_mac_minis_dwindle_ahead_of_new_models.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-51384 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="mac-mini-refresh" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/mac-mini-refresh.png" alt="mac-mini-refresh" width="523" height="167" /></a></center>
<p>If you or anyone you know were planning on picking up a Mac mini over the weekend (don&#8217;t laugh, we&#8217;re serious), you might want to hold off because AppleInsider has it on good authority that the teensy weensy computer rig is due for a refresh in the coming weeks. AI is reporting that multiple independent sources who order Mac minis in large quantities were either instructed to order only what is urgently needed or wait a few weeks. One educational institution had its order fulfilment estimate changed from several days to June 14th. Two months ago AI reported that prototype Mac mini&#8217;s spotted by Apple employees had the DVI port swapped out for a HDMI port and the inclusion of NVIDIA&#8217;s MPC89 chipset. The last <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2009/10/20/apple-updates-macbook-imac-mac-mini-magic-mouse/">Mac mini refresh</a> took pace last in October.<span id="more-51380"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/03/apples_supply_of_mac_minis_dwindle_ahead_of_new_models.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/04/mac-mini-refresh-just-around-the-bend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/mac-mini-refresh-80x80.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple announces refreshed iMac, Mac Pro and Mac Mini</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/03/apple-announces-refreshed-imac-mac-pro-and-mac-mini/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/03/apple-announces-refreshed-imac-mac-pro-and-mac-mini/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AirPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AirPort Extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Capsule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=18866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There you have it folks &#8212; done and done. The Apple Store is back up, new gear is live and credit card portals are wide open. Keeping things nice and simple, Apple has taken one of its two standard routes and simply tossed out a bunch of refreshes sans-hullabaloo. Here it is, now buy it. So what have we got? iMac: $1199 (only 20&#8243; model) &#8211; 2.66 GHz, 2GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, 320GB HD $1499 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 2.66 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, 640GB HD $1799 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 2.93 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, 640GB HD $2199 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 3.06 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 130, 1TB HD Mac Mini: $599 &#8211; 2.0GHz, 1GB 1066]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://store.apple.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-18867 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="imac-mac-mini" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/imac-mac-mini.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>There you have it folks &#8212; done and done. The Apple Store is back up, new gear is live and credit card portals are wide open. Keeping things nice and simple, Apple has taken one of its two standard routes and simply tossed out a bunch of refreshes sans-hullabaloo. <em>Here it is, now buy it</em>. So what have we got?</p>
<p><strong>iMac</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>$1199 (only 20&#8243; model) &#8211; 2.66 GHz, 2GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, 320GB HD</li>
<li>$1499 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 2.66 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M, 640GB HD</li>
<li>$1799 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 2.93 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, 640GB HD</li>
<li>$2199 (24&#8243;) &#8211; 3.06 GHz, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 130, 1TB HD</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Mac Mini:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>$599 &#8211; 2.0GHz, 1GB 1066 MHz DDRS SDRAM, GeForce 9400M, 120GB HD, 8x SuperDrive, Mini DisplayPort, mini-DVI, 5 USB Ports, FireWire 800 Port</li>
<li>$799 &#8211; 2.0GHz, 2GB 1066 MHz DDRS SDRAM, GeForce 9400M, 320GB HD, 8x SuperDrive, Mini DisplayPort, mini-DVI, 5 USB Ports, FireWire 800 Port</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Mac Pro:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>$2499 &#8211; 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3500 processor, 3GB of RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, 640GB HD</li>
<li>$3299 &#8211; Dual 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5500 processors, 6GB of RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, 640GB HD</li>
</ul>
<p>Apple definitely gave its desktop lineup a bit of an adrenaline shot, though it really didn&#8217;t come through with anything too Earth-shattering. What do you guys think? On a completely overshadowed note, Apple is now offering a 1TB Time Capsule for $500 (500GB for $299) and the AirPort Extreme Base Station, now capable of running two networks simultaneously, will run you $179 (old model is going for $159).</p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/03/apple-announces-refreshed-imac-mac-pro-and-mac-mini/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/imac-mac-mini-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple hosting an event on March 24th for desktops?</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/02/apple-hosting-an-event-on-march-24th-for-desktops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/02/apple-hosting-an-event-on-march-24th-for-desktops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Flores</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac mini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=18702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not confirmed yet, but there is a rumor going around interwebs-town about an event that Apple plans to hold on March 24th. In other words, rumors of Mac Mini and iMac refreshes are now revived for the 6,432,871st time. Yay! Sources for this are unconfirmed, but word seems to be coming from more than just one place which is never a bad thing. If things pan out we can only hope Apple has something big in store for that date, especially since many of us have been left longing after being bombarded with so many iMac and Mac Mini rumors. We&#8217;ll be sure to keep you updated as news comes our way. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2009/03/01/apple-event-scheduled-for-march-24/"><img class="size-full wp-image-18703 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="iMac" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/picture-552.png" alt="" width="499" height="377" /></a></center>
<p>It&#8217;s not confirmed yet, but there is a rumor going around interwebs-town about an event that Apple plans to hold on March 24th. In other words, rumors of <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2009/02/20/new-mac-mini-caught-on-video/">Mac Mini</a> and iMac refreshes are now revived for the 6,432,871st time. Yay! Sources for this are unconfirmed, but word seems to be coming from more than just one place which is never a bad thing. If things pan out we can only hope Apple has something big in store for that date, especially since many of us have been left longing after being bombarded with so many iMac and Mac Mini rumors. We&#8217;ll be sure to keep you updated as news comes our way.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2009/03/01/apple-event-scheduled-for-march-24/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2009/03/02/apple-hosting-an-event-on-march-24th-for-desktops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/picture-552-150x150.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notebook sales reportedly pass desktop sales ahead of predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/25/notebook-sales-reportedly-pass-desktop-sales-ahead-of-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/25/notebook-sales-reportedly-pass-desktop-sales-ahead-of-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=12572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market research firm iSuppli has just released data that points to a pretty major coup for portable computing. The firm is now reporting that laptop sales in Q3 2008 rose an astonishing 40 percent year-to-year, to 38.6 million units. Desktop sales on the other hand, fell to 38.5 million according to the firm&#8217;s numbers &#8211; a 1.3 percent drop off from Q3 2007. Analysts had predicted for quite some time that the changeover would take place in 2011 but it makes plenty of sense that 2008 was the year. Netbooks continue to have a huge impact on the consumer market, essentially offering users a notebook PC for the price of a desktop PC. As far as the enterprise market is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.internetnews.com/hardware/article.php/3793341/Notebooks%2BTop%2BDesktop%2BSales%2BAhead%2Bof%2BSchedule.htm&amp;cid=1282828729&amp;ei=dYdTSd6zAYrGMtDtqJYC&amp;usg=AFQjCNGDJlt9kS3ikN6vTq8p4xa0KzYhRg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12573" style="margin: 4px;" title="laptops" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/laptops.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="226" /></a>Market research firm iSuppli has just released data that points to a pretty major coup for portable computing. The firm is now reporting that laptop sales in Q3 2008 rose an astonishing 40 percent year-to-year, to 38.6 million units. Desktop sales on the other hand, fell to 38.5 million according to the firm&#8217;s numbers &#8211; a 1.3 percent drop off from Q3 2007. Analysts had predicted for quite some time that the changeover would take place in 2011 but it makes plenty of sense that 2008 was the year. Netbooks continue to have a huge impact on the consumer market, essentially offering users a notebook PC for the price of a desktop PC. As far as the enterprise market is concerned, notebook sales continue to grow because, well, businesses never want their employees to stop working. In terms of the split, HP is still leading the pack with 18.8 percent of the notebook market, followed by Dell (13.9 percent) and Acer (12.2 percent). Lenovo and Toshiba close out the top five with 7.5 and 4.6 percent respectively. Interestingly, Apple lost some of its notebook market share according to iSuppli&#8217;s data, slipping to 3.2 percent. iSuppli&#8217;s Peter Lin is quoted as saying, &#8220;When its competitors grow faster, it will lose market share. So I think the main reason [for the lost ground] is Apple has not provided a netbook yet.&#8221; While Apple&#8217;s refreshed MacBook line will have undoubtedly helped the company regain ground in Q4 2008, it looks like Cupertino might want to take another look at netbooks if it wants to become a major player in the laptop game.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.internetnews.com/hardware/article.php/3793341/Notebooks%2BTop%2BDesktop%2BSales%2BAhead%2Bof%2BSchedule.htm&amp;cid=1282828729&amp;ei=dYdTSd6zAYrGMtDtqJYC&amp;usg=AFQjCNGDJlt9kS3ikN6vTq8p4xa0KzYhRg">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/25/notebook-sales-reportedly-pass-desktop-sales-ahead-of-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/laptops-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-12 05:19:42 -->
