<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FCC approves AT&amp;T spectrum transfer to T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/25/fcc-approves-att-spectrum-transfer-to-t-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/25/fcc-approves-att-spectrum-transfer-to-t-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=137010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following AT&#38;T&#8217;s failed attempt to acquire T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom for $39 billion, AT&#38;T had to pay a lofty break-up fee as per the terms of its agreement. AT&#38;T&#8217;s related expenses totaled $4 billion, and included in that sum was the transfer of AWS spectrum licenses to T-Mobile in 128 different markets. On Wednesday, T-Mobile announced that the Federal Communications Commission has approved the transfer. &#8221;We applaud the FCC for acting swiftly to approve the transfer of these spectrum licenses,&#8221; T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray said in a statement. The nation&#8217;s No.4 carrier will use its newly acquired spectrum to help build out its next-generation 4G LTE network, which it hopes to launch next year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/25/fcc-approves-att-spectrum-transfer-to-t-mobile"><img class="size-full wp-image-81646 aligncenter" title="att-t-mobile-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att-t-mobile-logo110321173718.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="130" /></a></center>
<p>Following <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/24/att-withdraws-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-merger/">AT&amp;T&#8217;s failed attempt to acquire T-Mobile USA</a> from Deutsche Telekom for $39 billion, AT&amp;T had to pay a lofty break-up fee as per the terms of its agreement. AT&amp;T&#8217;s related expenses totaled $4 billion, and included in that sum was the transfer of AWS spectrum licenses to T-Mobile in 128 different markets. On Wednesday, T-Mobile announced that the Federal Communications Commission has approved the transfer. &#8221;We applaud the FCC for acting swiftly to approve the transfer of these spectrum licenses,&#8221; T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray said in a statement. The nation&#8217;s No.4 carrier will use its newly acquired spectrum to help <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/28/t-mobile-bails-on-hspa-84-plans-heads-straight-for-lte/">build out its next-generation 4G LTE network</a>, which it hopes to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/t-mobile-to-launch-10-lte-devices-and-iphone-compatible-4g-in-2013/">launch next year</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/25/fcc-approves-att-spectrum-transfer-to-t-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att-t-mobile-logo110321173718-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att-t-mobile-logo110321173718-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC fines T-Mobile $819,000 over accessibility issues</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/17/fcc-fines-t-mobile-819000-over-accessibility-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/17/fcc-fines-t-mobile-819000-over-accessibility-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearing Aid Compatibility Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing-aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission on Monday determined that T-Mobile must pay a fine of $819,000 for &#8220;willfully and repeatedly&#8221; failing to comply with rules regarding hearing-aid compatible handsets. According to the FCC, the carrier violated the rules during 2009 and 2010. The Hearing Aid Compatibility Order requires each carrier to have at least 10 handsets, or 50% of all devices, that support acoustic coupling and 7 phones, or 33% of all devices, with inductive coupling. T-Mobile may reduce or negate the proposed fine by proving to the FCC that it did not violate the rule, or that it didn&#8217;t violate it as severely as the FCC alleges. [Via PhoneScoop] Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/17/fcc-fines-t-mobile-819000-over-accessibility-issues"><img class="size-large wp-image-128209 aligncenter" title="T-Mobile-HQ" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/T-Mobile-HQ-645x483.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="483" /></a></center>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission on Monday determined that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/t-mobile">T-Mobile</a> must pay a fine of $819,000 for &#8220;willfully and repeatedly&#8221; failing to comply with rules regarding hearing-aid compatible handsets. According to the FCC, the carrier violated the rules during 2009 and 2010. The Hearing Aid Compatibility Order requires each carrier to have at least 10 handsets, or 50% of all devices, that support acoustic coupling and 7 phones, or 33% of all devices, with inductive coupling. T-Mobile may reduce or negate the proposed fine by proving to the FCC that it did not violate the rule, or that it didn&#8217;t violate it as severely as the FCC alleges. <span id="more-135945"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=10237">PhoneScoop</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=313580">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/17/fcc-fines-t-mobile-819000-over-accessibility-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC fines Google $25,000 for unauthorized data collection and impeding investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/fcc-fines-google-25000-for-unauthorized-data-collection-and-impeding-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/fcc-fines-google-25000-for-unauthorized-data-collection-and-impeding-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission has fined Google $25,000 for impeding a U.S. investigation into the data collection scandal surrounding its Street View project, in which the Internet giant allegedly accessed unsecured networks and collected personal information without users&#8217; permission. The FCC said the Mountain View-based company did not cooperate with the investigation and refused to reveal the names of its engineers associated with the project. &#8220;Google refused to identify any employees or produce any e-mails. The company could not supply compliant declarations without identifying employees it preferred not to identify,&#8221; the FCC said. &#8220;Misconduct of this nature threatens to compromise the commission&#8217;s ability to effectively investigate possible violations of the Communications Act and the commission&#8217;s rules.&#8221; In a statement provided to Reuters, Google challenged the agency&#8217;s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/fcc-fines-google-25000-for-unauthorized-data-collection-and-impeding-investigation"><img class="size-full wp-image-130612 aligncenter" title="google-sign-9876" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/google-sign-9876.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="395" /></a></center>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission has fined Google $25,000 for impeding a U.S. investigation into <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/19/data-captured-by-google-street-view-includes-passwords-and-emails/">the data collection scandal surrounding its Street View project</a>, in which the Internet giant allegedly accessed unsecured networks and collected personal information without users&#8217; permission. The FCC said the Mountain View-based company did not cooperate with the investigation and refused to reveal the names of its engineers associated with the project. &#8220;Google refused to identify any employees or produce any e-mails. The company could not supply compliant declarations without identifying employees it preferred not to identify,&#8221; the FCC said. &#8220;Misconduct of this nature threatens to compromise the commission&#8217;s ability to effectively investigate possible violations of the Communications Act and the commission&#8217;s rules.&#8221; <span id="more-135703"></span></p>
<p>In a statement provided to <em>Reuters</em>, Google challenged the agency&#8217;s findings and claimed it turned over the proper information. &#8221;As the FCC notes in their report, we provided all the materials the regulators felt they needed to conclude their investigation and we were not found to have violated any laws,&#8221; the company said. &#8220;We disagree with the FCC&#8217;s characterization of our cooperation in their investigation and will be filing a response.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/16/us-google-fine-idUSBRE83F00Q20120416">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/fcc-fines-google-25000-for-unauthorized-data-collection-and-impeding-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/google-sign-9876-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/google-sign-9876-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. carriers partner with FCC to track stolen cell phones</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/10/u-s-carriers-partner-with-fcc-to-track-stolen-cell-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/10/u-s-carriers-partner-with-fcc-to-track-stolen-cell-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stolen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four major wireless providers in the United States have partnered with the Federal Communications Commission in an effort to curb cell phone theft, The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday. The wireless companies will build a central database of stolen cell phones, which will track phones that are reported as lost or stolen and deny them voice and data service. The goal of the database is to reduce crime by making it very difficult to use a stolen device. Verizon Wireless and Sprint currently block phones that are reported stolen from being reactivated. AT&#38;T and T-Mobile do not, although all four carriers have now agreed to be part of the new database. Members of Congress are also expected to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/10/u-s-carriers-partner-with-fcc-to-track-stolen-cell-phones"><img class="size-full wp-image-134191 aligncenter" title="Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-2.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>The four major wireless providers in the United States have partnered with the Federal Communications Commission in an effort to curb cell phone theft, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported on Tuesday. The wireless companies will build a central database of stolen cell phones, which will track phones that are reported as lost or stolen and deny them voice and data service. The goal of the database is to reduce crime by making it very difficult to use a stolen device. Verizon Wireless and Sprint currently block phones that are reported stolen from being reactivated. AT&amp;T and T-Mobile do not, although all four carriers have now agreed to be part of the new database. Members of Congress are also expected to propose legislation to make it a crime to alter a cell phone&#8217;s unique identification number, according to the report. Similar stolen-phone databases are already in place in the U.K., Germany, France and Australia. While crime hasn&#8217;t completely stopped, the number of incidents has apparently declined. Carriers will roll out individual databases within six months that will be centralized over a 12-month period, with smaller regional wireless providers expected to join the database over the next two years. <span id="more-135053"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303815404577334152199453024.html?mod=rss_whats_news_technology">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/10/u-s-carriers-partner-with-fcc-to-track-stolen-cell-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-2-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-2-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>LightSquared considering bankruptcy after being derailed by regulators</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/lightsquared-considering-bankruptcy-after-being-derailed-by-regulators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/lightsquared-considering-bankruptcy-after-being-derailed-by-regulators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=134592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LightSquared founder Phillip Falcone said he may consider voluntary bankruptcy for his troubled wireless broadband venture, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. &#8220;There are arguments that we would be better off in bankruptcy than not,&#8221; Falcone said. &#8220;LightSquared, if I have to, I’ll put it into bankruptcy. I don’t care,&#8221; adding that he would maintain control of the company if it were to file. LightSquared planned to build a high-speed data network that would cover as many as 260 million users, however it failed to gain approval from federal regulators. The FCC blocked LightSquared’s LTE network in February due to concerns surrounding interference with GPS systems. Through his hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, Falcone has invested roughly $3 billion in the failed venture. Bankruptcy is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/lightsquared-considering-bankruptcy-after-being-derailed-by-regulators"><img class="size-full wp-image-111201 aligncenter" title="lightsquared-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="169" /></a></center>
<p>LightSquared founder Phillip Falcone said he may consider voluntary bankruptcy for his troubled wireless broadband venture, <em>Bloomberg</em> reported on Wednesday. &#8220;There are arguments that we would be better off in bankruptcy than not,&#8221; Falcone said. &#8220;LightSquared, if I have to, I’ll put it into bankruptcy. I don’t care,&#8221; adding that he would maintain control of the company if it were to file. LightSquared planned to build a high-speed data network that would cover as many as 260 million users, however it failed to gain approval from federal regulators. The FCC <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/">blocked LightSquared’s LTE network</a> in February due to concerns surrounding interference with GPS systems. Through his hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, Falcone has invested roughly $3 billion in the failed venture. Bankruptcy is &#8220;not what I want, not what I desire, I’d rather find a different way out,&#8221; he said. <span id="more-134592"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-04/falcone-says-bankruptcy-is-an-option-for-lightsquared.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/lightsquared-considering-bankruptcy-after-being-derailed-by-regulators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unannounced LG Windows Phone for Sprint revealed by FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/unannounced-lg-windows-phone-for-sprint-revealed-by-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/unannounced-lg-windows-phone-for-sprint-revealed-by-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=134403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission recently published documents that reveal information about an unannounced Windows Phone device from LG. According to the documents, the LG LS831 supports CDMA in the 800 MHz and 1900 MHz bands, indicating that the handset will land on Sprint&#8217;s 3G network. Images reveal that the smartphone features a 5-megapixel rear camera, a front-facing camera, a headphone jack and a microUSB port. Sprint hasn&#8217;t launched a Windows Phone device since the HTC Arrive was released in early 2011, however the carrier is rumored to be prepping an LTE-equipped Windows Phone for a fall launch. [Via Phonescoop] Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/lg-windows-phone-passes-through-the-fcc-heading-to-sprint"><img class="size-full wp-image-134412 aligncenter" title="LG-FCC-WindowsPhone" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LG-FCC-WindowsPhone.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="374" /></a></center>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission recently published documents that reveal information about an unannounced Windows Phone device from LG. According to the documents, the LG LS831 supports CDMA in the 800 MHz and 1900 MHz bands, indicating that the handset will land on Sprint&#8217;s 3G network. Images reveal that the smartphone features a 5-megapixel rear camera, a front-facing camera, a headphone jack and a microUSB port. Sprint hasn&#8217;t launched a Windows Phone device since the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/16/htc-arrive-review/">HTC Arrive</a> was released in early 2011, however the carrier is rumored to be <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/20/sprint-rumored-to-be-prepping-an-lte-equipped-windows-phone-for-fall-launch/">prepping an LTE-equipped Windows Phone for a fall launch</a>.<span id="more-134403"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=10173">Phonescoop</a>]</p>
<p><a href="https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?RequestTimeout=30">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/05/unannounced-lg-windows-phone-for-sprint-revealed-by-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LG-FCC-WindowsPhone-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LG-FCC-WindowsPhone-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dish Network&#8217;s spectrum should avoid GPS issues suffered by LightSquared, analysts say</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/19/dish-networks-spectrum-should-avoid-gps-issues-suffered-by-lightsquared-analysts-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/19/dish-networks-spectrum-should-avoid-gps-issues-suffered-by-lightsquared-analysts-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=132435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Falcone&#8217;s startup LightSquared planned to deploy a nationwide 4G LTE network in the United States. The firm&#8217;s service was found to cause interference with spectrum used by various GPS navigation and tracking solutions, however, forcing the Federal Communications Commission to block the network&#8217;s launch. Dish Network is looking to build a similar network and is currently awaiting government approval. Executives and analysts have said that Dish will probably avoid the interference concerns that killed LightSquared&#8217;s network, Bloomberg reported on Monday. The satellite company&#8217;s frequencies, which are above 2GHz, are far away from those used by GPS devices and Lightsquared&#8217;s 1600Mhz band, and are less likely to interfere. &#8220;It’s not as close to GPS, so it’s unlikely to interfere,” said Matthew Desch,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/19/dish-networks-spectrum-should-avoid-gps-issues-suffered-by-lightsquared-analyst-say"><img class="size-large wp-image-132439 aligncenter" title="Dish-Network" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Dish-Network-645x417.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="417" /></a></center>
<p>Philip Falcone&#8217;s startup LightSquared planned to deploy a nationwide 4G LTE network in the United States. The firm&#8217;s service was found to cause interference with spectrum used by various GPS navigation and tracking solutions, however, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/">forcing the Federal Communications Commission to block the network&#8217;s launch</a>. Dish Network is looking to build a similar network and is currently awaiting government approval. Executives and analysts have said that Dish will probably avoid the interference concerns that killed LightSquared&#8217;s network, <em>Bloomberg</em> reported on Monday. The satellite company&#8217;s frequencies, which are above 2GHz, are far away from those used by GPS devices and Lightsquared&#8217;s 1600Mhz band, and are less likely to interfere. &#8220;It’s not as close to GPS, so it’s unlikely to interfere,” said Matthew Desch, chief executive officer of Iridium Communications, which operates more than 60 satellites. &#8220;But the approval is going to take some time. The FCC is going to make sure they don’t have another LightSquared problem on their hands.&#8221; Bryan Kraft, an analyst at Evercore Partners, believes that Dish will gain FCC approval in 6 to 12 months. <span id="more-132435"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-19/dish-seen-avoiding-signal-problem-that-hurt-falcone-in-fcc-probe.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/19/dish-networks-spectrum-should-avoid-gps-issues-suffered-by-lightsquared-analysts-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Dish-Network-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Dish-Network-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry PlayBooks with HSPA+ and LTE radios pass through the FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/14/blackberry-playbooks-with-hspa-and-lte-radios-pass-through-the-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/14/blackberry-playbooks-with-hspa-and-lte-radios-pass-through-the-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research in Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=131749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research in Motion&#8217;s BlackBerry PlayBook may be down, but it&#8217;s definitely not out. Over a year ago, the company revealed plans to release an LTE-compatible PlayBook as well as a 3G model that will work on HSPA+ networks. Details surrounding these variants have been few and far between, with some assuming they were simply canceled. As it turns out, two tablets from Research in Motion recently passed through the FCC equipped with HSPA+ connectivity and AT&#38;T compatible LTE radios. BGR in January exclusively reported details about RIM&#8217;s plans to introduce a new PlayBook tablet around May or June that will be equipped with a 1.5GHz processor, built-in HSPA+ and NFC support. [Via Engadget] Read [LTE] Read [HSPA+]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/14/blackberry-playbooks-with-hspa-and-lte-radios-pass-through-the-fcc"><img class="size-full wp-image-122709 aligncenter" title="blackberry-playbook-closeup" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/blackberry-playbook-closeup.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="367" /></a></center>
<p>Research in Motion&#8217;s BlackBerry PlayBook <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/21/blackberry-7-sales-stall-playbook-sell-through-remains-sluggish/">may be down</a>, but <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/16/apples-ipad-loses-market-share-in-q4-to-the-blackberry-playbook/">it&#8217;s definitely not out</a>. Over a year ago, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/15/rim-reveals-plans-for-lte-hspa-blackberry-playbook-tablets/">the company revealed plans</a> to release an LTE-compatible PlayBook as well as a 3G model that will work on HSPA+ networks. Details surrounding these variants have been few and far between, with some assuming they were simply canceled. As it turns out, two tablets from Research in Motion recently passed through the FCC equipped with HSPA+ connectivity and AT&amp;T compatible LTE radios. BGR in January <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/rims-roadmap-for-20122013-two-blackberry-10-phones-two-curves-hspa-playbook/">exclusively reported details about RIM&#8217;s plans to introduce a new PlayBook tablet</a> around May or June that will be equipped with a 1.5GHz processor, built-in HSPA+ and NFC support.<span id="more-131749"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/hspa-blackberry-playbook-hits-the-fcc/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=702692&amp;fcc_id=%27L6AREG50LW%27">Read</a> [LTE] <a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=638498&amp;fcc_id=%27L6AREH50UW%27">Read</a> [HSPA+]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/14/blackberry-playbooks-with-hspa-and-lte-radios-pass-through-the-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/blackberry-playbook-closeup-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/blackberry-playbook-closeup-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint to end deal with LightSquared, report claims</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/07/sprint-to-end-deal-with-lightsquared-report-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/07/sprint-to-end-deal-with-lightsquared-report-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=130665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sprint is reportedly planning to walk away from its planned network-sharing deal with LightSquared as early as next week, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. Sprint and LightSquared in June agreed to an 11-year deal that would share network expansion costs and equipment if LightSquared could secure regulatory approval for its 4G LTE network build-out. The carrier first gave LightSquared until the end of 2011 to receive FCC approval, and then extended the deadline to March 15th. The FCC blocked LightSquared&#8217;s LTE network in February, however, due to concerns that it was interfering with GPS systems. Meanwhile, LightSquared repeatedly claimed that the blame lies with the GPS industry. According to the Bloomberg&#8217;s sources, Sprint has no plans to extend the March 15th deadline and will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/07/sprint-to-end-deal-with-lightsquared-report-claims"><img class="size-full wp-image-126174 aligncenter" title="sprint-sign-3" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/sprint-sign-3.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="430" /></a></center>
<p>Sprint is reportedly planning to walk away from its planned network-sharing deal with LightSquared as early as next week, <em>Bloomberg</em> reported on Wednesday. Sprint and LightSquared in June agreed to an 11-year deal that would share network expansion costs and equipment if LightSquared could secure regulatory approval for its 4G LTE network build-out. The carrier first gave LightSquared until the end of 2011 to receive FCC approval, and then extended the deadline to March 15th. The FCC <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/">blocked LightSquared&#8217;s LTE network</a> in February, however, due to concerns that it was interfering with GPS systems. Meanwhile, LightSquared repeatedly claimed that the blame lies with the GPS industry. According to the <em>Bloomberg&#8217;s</em> sources, Sprint has no plans to extend the March 15th deadline and will instead kill its deal with LightSquared. Sprint is expected to return $74 million of the $310 million it has collected from LightSquared so far once the deal is terminated.<span id="more-130665"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-07/sprint-said-to-plan-end-to-deal-with-falcone-s-lightsquared.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/07/sprint-to-end-deal-with-lightsquared-report-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/sprint-sign-3-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/sprint-sign-3-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon explains locked bootloader stance in letter to FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locked Bootloader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unlocked bootloaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=129948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a response to the FCC following a formal complaint, Verizon Wireless has outlined the company&#8217;s policy on locked bootloaders. An irate Droid-Life reader became fed up with the carrier&#8217;s consistent locking of bootloaders on its flagship devices and decided to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. The reader claimed Verizon&#8217;s policy was in violation of the &#8220;Block C license,&#8221; an agreement the company made when it purchased its 700MHz LTE spectrum. Within the agreement, it is stated that Verizon should not be allowed to &#8220;lock a phone,&#8221; which many interpreted as a statement that should include a phone&#8217;s bootloader. Read on for more and a copy of Verizon&#8217;s letter. Verizon claims that it &#8220;has established a standard of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/01/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc"><img class="size-full wp-image-99334 aligncenter" title="verizon-building" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/verizon-building.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="309" /></a></center>
<p>In a response to the FCC following a formal complaint, Verizon Wireless has outlined the company&#8217;s policy on locked bootloaders. An irate <em>Droid-Life</em> reader became fed up with the carrier&#8217;s consistent locking of bootloaders on its flagship devices and decided to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. The reader claimed Verizon&#8217;s policy was in violation of the &#8220;Block C license,&#8221; an agreement the company made when it purchased its 700MHz LTE spectrum. Within the agreement, it is stated that Verizon should not be allowed to &#8220;lock a phone,&#8221; which many interpreted as a statement that should include a phone&#8217;s bootloader. Read on for more and a copy of Verizon&#8217;s letter. <span id="more-129948"></span></p>
<p>Verizon claims that it &#8220;has established a standard of excellence in customer experience with our branded devices&#8221; and &#8220;an open bootloader could prevent Verizon Wireless from providing the same level of customer experience and support because it would allow users to change the phone or otherwise modify the software and potentially, negatively impact how the phone connects with the network.&#8221; The carrier&#8217;s policy is to provide the best solution &#8220;for as many customers as possible” and as we&#8217;ve suggested, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/iconfess-why-an-android-fan-recommends-the-iphone/">most consumers likely don’t care about rooting, ROMs or the concept of being &#8220;open.&#8221;</a> They just want a sleek smartphone that works.</p>
<center><img class="size-large wp-image-129964 aligncenter" title="verizon-fcc-bootloader1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-645x899.png" alt="" width="645" height="899" /></center>
<p><a href="http://www.droid-life.com/2012/02/29/letter-from-verizon-to-fcc-details-their-stance-on-bootloaders/#more-63166">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/verizon-explains-locked-bootloader-stance-in-letter-to-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-128x128.png">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/verizon-fcc-bootloader1-128x128.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile asks FCC to block Verizon spectrum deal</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/t-mobile-asks-fcc-to-block-verizon-spectrum-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/t-mobile-asks-fcc-to-block-verizon-spectrum-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bright House Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=128200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-Mobile is urging federal regulators to block Verizon&#8217;s planned spectrum acquisition from SpectrumCo, a joint venture formed by Comcast, Time Warner and Bright House Networks. Verizon&#8217;s pending purchase could be worth $3.9 billion and would help the company build out its nationwide LTE network. In a filing late Tuesday, T-Mobile said the Federal Communications Commission should block the deal because it would place an &#8220;excessive concentration&#8221; of wireless spectrum in Verizon&#8217;s hands, reports the Associated Press. The AWS bands that Verizon is looking to acquire uses the same frequencies that T-Mobile uses for its HSPA+ network. T-Mobile claims that the nation&#8217;s No.1 carrier already has a large amount of spectrum and does not need any more, and T-Mobile can &#8220;quickly, more intensively, and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/t-mobile-asks-fcc-to-block-verizon-spectrum-deal"><img class="size-large wp-image-128209 aligncenter" title="T-Mobile-HQ" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/T-Mobile-HQ-645x483.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="483" /></a></center>
<p>T-Mobile is urging federal regulators to block <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/02/verizon-wireless-acquires-spectrum-from-comcast-others-for-3-6-billion/">Verizon&#8217;s planned spectrum acquisition</a> from SpectrumCo, a joint venture formed by Comcast, Time Warner and Bright House Networks. Verizon&#8217;s pending purchase could be worth $3.9 billion and would help the company build out its nationwide LTE network. In a filing late Tuesday, T-Mobile said the Federal Communications Commission should block the deal because it would place an &#8220;excessive concentration&#8221; of wireless spectrum in Verizon&#8217;s hands, reports the <em>Associated Press</em>. The AWS bands that Verizon is looking to acquire uses the same frequencies that T-Mobile uses for its HSPA+ network. T-Mobile claims that the nation&#8217;s No.1 carrier already has a large amount of spectrum and does not need any more, and T-Mobile can &#8220;quickly, more intensively, and more efficiently&#8221; put the spectrum to use compared to Verizon. MetroPCS, the nation&#8217;s fifth-largest wireless provider, also urged the FCC to block the deal, claiming both parties had not provided enough information to prove that the acquisition is in the public&#8217;s best interest. Verizon and SpectrumCo hope to close the deal by the middle of this year.<span id="more-128200"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gkZwm2uaqBEh6-uczrdN_vXteBGg?docId=73880395026142e88264697b3b802638">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/t-mobile-asks-fcc-to-block-verizon-spectrum-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/T-Mobile-HQ-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/T-Mobile-HQ-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>LightSquared plans to lay off 45% of its staff</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/21/lightsquared-plans-to-lay-off-45-of-its-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/21/lightsquared-plans-to-lay-off-45-of-its-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightsquared]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LightSquared announced on Tuesday that the company plans to cut its workforce by 45% in an effort to cut costs. &#8221;This and other cost savings measures will allow LightSquared to continue to navigate the regulatory process as it works with the appropriate government agencies to find solutions to the GPS interference issue and bring its $14 billion privately funded wireless broadband network to more than 260 million Americans,&#8221; the company said in a statement to Reuters. Last week, the FCC announced that it would block the company&#8217;s planned 4G LTE network due to issues concerning GPS interference. LightSquared currently employs 330 people and according to Reuters, the company is not currently considering bankruptcy. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/21/lightsquared-plans-to-lay-off-45-of-its-staff"><img class="size-full wp-image-106327 aligncenter" title="650-lightsquared-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/650-lightsquared-logo.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="250" /></a></center>
<p>LightSquared announced on Tuesday that the company plans to cut its workforce by 45% in an effort to cut costs. &#8221;This and other cost savings measures will allow LightSquared to continue to navigate the regulatory process as it works with the appropriate government agencies to find solutions to the GPS interference issue and bring its $14 billion privately funded wireless broadband network to more than 260 million Americans,&#8221; the company said in a statement to <em>Reuters</em>. Last week, the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/">FCC announced that it would block the company&#8217;s planned 4G LTE network</a> due to issues concerning GPS interference. LightSquared currently employs 330 people and according to <em>Reuters</em>, the company is not currently considering bankruptcy.<span id="more-127994"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/21/us-lightsquared-idUSTRE81K1XN20120221">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/21/lightsquared-plans-to-lay-off-45-of-its-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/650-lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/650-lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC to block rollout of LightSquared 4G LTE network</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LTE startup LightSquared is about to be dealt the final blow in a longstanding battle that has seen its dream of becoming &#8220;America&#8217;s dumbest pipe&#8220; shattered. Controlled by hedge fund manager Philip Falcone, LightSquared had plans to deploy a nationwide 4G LTE network in the United States that would be licensed to wholesalers and utilized by carrier partners such as Sprint. LightSquared&#8217;s network was found to cause interference with spectrum used by various GPS navigation and tracking solutions, and though frequency bleeding caused by GPS network inefficiencies are to blame according to LightSquared, the Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday said it would not allow LightSquared&#8217;s network to launch. &#8220;NTIA, the federal agency that coordinates spectrum uses for the military and other]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network"><img class="size-full wp-image-111201 aligncenter" title="lightsquared-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="169" /></a></center>
<p>LTE startup LightSquared is about to be dealt the final blow in a longstanding battle that has seen its dream of becoming &#8220;<a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/04/lightsquared-wants-to-be-americas-dumbest-pipe/">America&#8217;s dumbest pipe</a>&#8220; shattered. Controlled by hedge fund manager Philip Falcone, LightSquared had plans to deploy a nationwide 4G LTE network in the United States that would be licensed to wholesalers and utilized by carrier partners <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/sprint-gives-lightsquared-six-more-weeks-to-gain-fcc-approval/">such as Sprint</a>. LightSquared&#8217;s network was found to cause interference with spectrum used by various GPS navigation and tracking solutions, and though frequency bleeding caused by GPS network inefficiencies are to blame according to LightSquared, the Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday said it would not allow LightSquared&#8217;s network to launch. &#8220;NTIA, the federal agency that coordinates spectrum uses for the military and other federal government entities, has now concluded that there is no practical way to mitigate potential interference at this time,&#8221; FCC spokesman Tammy Sun wrote in a letter on Wednesday. &#8220;Consequently, the Commission will not lift the prohibition on LightSquared.&#8221; The FCC did acknowledge that the GPS industry must address the interference its networks are causing in order to free up neighboring spectrum for use by consumer broadband networks.<span id="more-127163"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=312479">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/fcc-to-block-rollout-of-lightsquared-4g-lte-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lightsquared-logo-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC to reform and modernize Lifeline program for low-income families</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/01/fcc-to-reform-and-modernize-lifeline-program-for-low-income-families/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/01/fcc-to-reform-and-modernize-lifeline-program-for-low-income-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission announced on Monday the reformation and modernization of the Lifeline program. The revamped program will ensure affordable phone service is available to low-income families. Lifeline is a &#8220;universal service program that fulfills Congress’s mandate to ensure the availability of communications to all Americans.&#8221; The percentage of low-income households with phone service has increased dramatically since the program began in 1985, from 80% to nearly 92% last year. The FCC is looking to create a number of databases and protocols to end carrier abuse of the program. One such measure will be the creation of an eligibility database from governmental data sources to automate eligibility of initial and ongoing Lifeline participants. The move will &#8220;reduce the potential for fraud while cutting red]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/01/fcc-to-reform-and-modernize-lifeline-program-for-low-income-families"><img class="size-full wp-image-99538 aligncenter" title="64101-fcc-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></a></center>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission announced on Monday the reformation and modernization of <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/11/over-half-of-net-new-sprint-subscribers-utilize-government-sponsored-lifeline-service/">the Lifeline program</a>. The revamped program will ensure affordable phone service is available to low-income families. Lifeline is a &#8220;universal service program that fulfills Congress’s mandate to ensure the availability of communications to all Americans.&#8221; The percentage of low-income households with phone service has increased dramatically since the program began in 1985, from 80% to nearly 92% last year. The FCC is looking to create a number of databases and protocols to end carrier abuse of the program. One such measure will be the creation of an eligibility database from governmental data sources to automate eligibility of initial and ongoing Lifeline participants. The move will &#8220;reduce the potential for fraud while cutting red tape for consumers and providers.&#8221; Lifeline is set to be revamped by no later than the end of 2013.<span id="more-125121"></span><br />
<a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0131/DOC-312210A1.pdf">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/01/fcc-to-reform-and-modernize-lifeline-program-for-low-income-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regional carriers ask FCC to impose a &#8216;shot clock&#8217; for roaming agreements</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/regional-carriers-ask-fcc-to-impose-a-shot-clock-for-roaming-agreements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/regional-carriers-ask-fcc-to-impose-a-shot-clock-for-roaming-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metroPCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Cellular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MetroPCS, U.S. Cellular and several other regional carriers have requested that the Federal Communications Commission initiate a &#8220;shot clock&#8221; for roaming agreements with larger wireless carriers. &#8220;Supporters stressed that imposing a shot clock on negotiations is necessary to provide the proper incentive for potential roaming partners to timely respond to inquiries,&#8221; a lawyer representing the regional carriers said in a letter to FCC Secretary Marlene H. Dortch. &#8220;Although data roaming negotiations may involve complex issues, the Joint Supporters emphasized that other situations that incorporate shot clocks, such as interconnection and siting negotiations, also have the potential to involve complex issues, and yet, a shot clock still has been successfully implemented in those negotiations.&#8221; In other words, the smaller wireless carriers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/regional-carriers-ask-fcc-to-impose-a-shot-clock-for-roaming-agreements"><img class="size-full wp-image-99538 aligncenter" title="64101-fcc-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></a></center>
<p>MetroPCS, U.S. Cellular and several other regional carriers have requested that the Federal Communications Commission initiate a &#8220;shot clock&#8221; for roaming agreements with larger wireless carriers. &#8220;Supporters stressed that imposing a shot clock on negotiations is necessary to provide the proper incentive for potential roaming partners to timely respond to inquiries,&#8221; a lawyer representing the regional carriers said in a letter to FCC Secretary Marlene H. Dortch. &#8220;Although data roaming negotiations may involve complex issues, the Joint Supporters emphasized that other situations that incorporate shot clocks, such as interconnection and siting negotiations, also have the potential to involve complex issues, and yet, a shot clock still has been successfully implemented in those negotiations.&#8221; In other words, the smaller wireless carriers want larger carriers to stop stalling when it comes to negotiating roaming deals in areas where regional carriers provide connectivity and to instead &#8220;engage in good faith negotiations.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-125013"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/smaller-carriers-press-fcc-shot-clock-data-roaming-negotiations/2012-01-31">FierceWireless</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view;jsessionid=PyCLMQmt7QDyCgSgRCHyQTGJHlZRJrJgYTJ20cP4NmPttswtnrtJ!1954280887!1513658215?id=7021857050">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/regional-carriers-ask-fcc-to-impose-a-shot-clock-for-roaming-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/64101-fcc-logo-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-05-31 14:28:39 -->
