<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House defeats digital TV delay bill</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/29/house-defeats-digital-tv-delay-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/29/house-defeats-digital-tv-delay-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Hodgkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=15662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Representatives defeated the digital TV delay bill with a 258-168 vote that failed to secure the two thirds needed for passage. The vote closely followed party lines with 155 Republicans voting against the bill and 22 Republicans voting for it. Amongst House Democrats, 236 voted for the bill and a mere 13 voted against it. The defeat signaled a win for House republicans who have opposed the delay, claiming the four month delay would further confuse consumers, cause an unnecessary delay for companies and public safety agencies waiting for the spectrum to be released and burden TV companies with the additional cost of broadcasting both analog and digital signals during the four month delay. The defeat is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090129/ap_on_hi_te/digital_tv_transition"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15708 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="capitol-building" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/capitol-building-300x200.jpg" alt="capitol" width="300" height="200" /></a></center>
<p>The House of Representatives defeated the digital TV delay bill with a  258-168 vote that failed to secure the two thirds needed for passage. The vote closely followed party lines with 155 Republicans voting against the bill and 22 Republicans voting for it. Amongst House Democrats, 236 voted for the bill and a mere 13 voted against it. The defeat signaled a win for House republicans who have opposed the delay, claiming the four month delay would further confuse consumers, cause an unnecessary delay for companies and public safety agencies waiting for the spectrum to be released and burden TV companies with the additional cost of broadcasting both analog and digital signals during the four month delay. The defeat is a setback for the Obama administration and congressional democrats who believe that the current resources to assist people in the digital TV transition are in a state of disarray and are concerned that the public, particularly poor, rural and low-income Americans, will not be adequately prepared when the analog air waves are turned off on February 17th. The Obama administration and congressional democrats still claim to be exploring all options to secure another vote on this issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090129/ap_on_hi_te/digital_tv_transition">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/29/house-defeats-digital-tv-delay-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/capitol-building-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers weigh in on white space, tell FCC to delay vote</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/13/lawmakers-weigh-in-on-white-space-tell-fcc-to-delay-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/13/lawmakers-weigh-in-on-white-space-tell-fcc-to-delay-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Hodgkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=11426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First it was the White House that voiced its opposition earlier this week to the FCC&#8217;s plan for free wireless broadband using the white space spectrum, now it is Congress&#8217;s turn to weigh in on the matter. In a letter to the FCC,  the incoming chairmen for the Senate and House Commerce committees, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), urged the FCC to focus on the upcoming digital TV transition and to stay away from &#8220;complex and controversial items that the new Congress and new administration will have an interest in reviewing&#8221; during the FCC&#8217;s next and final meeting for 2008. The FCC responded by saying that it is reviewing the letter and will reach out to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20081212/WIRELESS/812129985/-1/ALL"><img style="margin: 4px; float: right;" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/fcc.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="114" /></a>First it was the White House that voiced its opposition earlier this week to the FCC&#8217;s plan for free wireless broadband using the white space spectrum, now it is Congress&#8217;s turn to weigh in on the matter. In a letter to the FCC,  the incoming chairmen for the Senate and House Commerce committees, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), urged the FCC to focus on the upcoming digital TV transition and to stay away from &#8220;complex and controversial items that the new Congress and new administration will have an interest in reviewing&#8221; during the FCC&#8217;s next and final meeting for 2008. The FCC responded by saying that it is reviewing the letter and will reach out to the other offices before making a final decision on the vote. This request for a delay is in direct opposition to the request made by M2Z networks, a potential licensee of this white space spectrum and one of the driving forces behind the free wireless broadband proposal, which claimed that &#8220;any further delay from the FCC on this matter would result in the violation of a self-imposed Congressional deadline and would constitute a violation of the Communications Act.&#8221;  With increasing pressure from both sides and the December 18th meeting drawing closer, the FCC only has a few short days to render a decision. The only thing we can be sure of is that the decision, regardless of which way it falls, will surely generate yet another round of controversy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20081212/WIRELESS/812129985/-1/ALL">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/13/lawmakers-weigh-in-on-white-space-tell-fcc-to-delay-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/fcc-150x114.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-12 04:20:05 -->
