<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s first PC game, co-written by Bill Gates, now available for the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/worlds-first-pc-game-co-written-by-bill-gates-now-available-for-the-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/worlds-first-pc-game-co-written-by-bill-gates-now-available-for-the-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DONKEY.BAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=126506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Owners of Apple&#8217;s iPhone and iPod touch can now enjoy a remake of the first-ever PC game, co-written by Bill Gates himself, which came pre-installed on several IBM computers in 1981. First released late last month, XVision&#8217;s DONKEY.BAS is a terrific recreation of the PC game by the same name. Players control a race car as it advances up the screen. Donkeys repeatedly come into view, and the simple goal is to switch lanes before colliding with any curious creatures. &#8220;We did this game as a tribute to the original,&#8221; XVision founder Johnny Ixe told BGR, noting that the firm added a number of new features to the game in order to distinguish it from the original. The spirit of the game remains,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/worlds-first-pc-game-cowritten-by-bill-gates-now-available-for-the-iphone"><img class="size-full wp-image-126509 aligncenter" title="donkey-bas" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/donkey-bas.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></center>
<p>Owners of Apple&#8217;s iPhone and iPod touch can now enjoy a remake of the first-ever PC game, co-written by Bill Gates himself, which came pre-installed on several IBM computers in 1981. First released late last month, XVision&#8217;s DONKEY.BAS is a terrific recreation of the PC game by the same name. Players control a race car as it advances up the screen. Donkeys repeatedly come into view, and the simple goal is to switch lanes before colliding with any curious creatures. &#8220;We did this game as a tribute to the original,&#8221; XVision founder Johnny Ixe told BGR, noting that the firm added a number of new features to the game in order to distinguish it from the original. The spirit of the game remains, however, and gamers looking for a bit of nostalgia would be hard-pressed to find a better blast from the past. DONKEY.BAS is available now in the App Store for $0.99.<span id="more-126506"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/donkey.bas/id496795223?mt=8">Read</a> [iTunes link]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/worlds-first-pc-game-co-written-by-bill-gates-now-available-for-the-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/donkey-bas-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple edges out IBM to become the top brand of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/07/apple-edges-out-ibm-to-become-the-top-brand-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/07/apple-edges-out-ibm-to-become-the-top-brand-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davis Brand Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has edged out IBM to become the top brand of 2011, according to an annual list from marketing strategy firm Davis Brand Capital. The Cupertino-based company ousted IBM, which topped the list in 2009 and 2010. Apple was previously ranked No.12 in 2009 and No.7 in 2010. Davis evaluates the top 25 brands annually using five categories that go beyond traditional marketing functions. &#8220;The annual 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 ranking evaluates companies&#8217; abilities to manage and balance the five key intangible categories that comprise brand capital: brand value; competitive performance; innovation strength; company culture; and social impact,&#8221; the company said in a press release. &#8220;The ranking does not aim to place a financial value on the brand capital]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/07/apple-edges-out-ibm-to-become-the-top-brand-of-2011"><img class="size-full wp-image-125336 aligncenter" title="apple-logo-sign-01" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/apple-logo-sign-01.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="436" /></a></center>
<p>Apple has edged out IBM to become the top brand of 2011, according to an annual list from marketing strategy firm Davis Brand Capital. The Cupertino-based company ousted IBM, which topped the list in 2009 and 2010. Apple was previously ranked No.12 in 2009 and No.7 in 2010. Davis evaluates the top 25 brands annually using five categories that go beyond traditional marketing functions. &#8220;The annual 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 ranking evaluates companies&#8217; abilities to manage and balance the five key intangible categories that comprise brand capital: brand value; competitive performance; innovation strength; company culture; and social impact,&#8221; the company said in a press release. &#8220;The ranking does not aim to place a financial value on the brand capital of the companies. Rather, the list reveals the comparative strength and breadth of the companies&#8217; brand capital.&#8221; As in previous years, the rankings were dominated by technology companies such as Google, Microsoft, HP, Cisco, Intel and Samsung. Read on for the complete list of Davis Brand Capital top 25.<span id="more-125927"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Davis Names Top-25 Companies with Most Brand Capital in 2011</strong><br />
<em>Top-performing Brand Capital Managers Best S&amp;P 500 in 2011; Apple Takes #1 Spot on List Dominated by Tech Leaders; Toyota Reappears at #20 After Precipitous Fall</em></p>
<p>ATLANTA, Feb 06, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) &#8212; Davis Brand Capital today released the 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 ranking, which evaluates brand beyond its traditional marketing function and considers it as a blend of key intangibles. It is the only annual ranking of companies demonstrating comprehensive and balanced approaches to managing the full spectrum of brand capital, which provides an indication of the strength and effectiveness of an entire business.</p>
<p>The top-performing companies on the Davis Brand Capital 25 outpaced the S&amp;P 500 in 2011. A hypothetical stock portfolio consisting of these companies, with holdings proportionately allocated according to each company&#8217;s position in the ranking, outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by 9.32 percent.</p>
<p>The annual 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 ranking evaluates companies&#8217; abilities to manage and balance the five key intangible categories that comprise brand capital: brand value; competitive performance; innovation strength; company culture; and social impact. The ranking does not aim to place a financial value on the brand capital of the companies. Rather, the list reveals the comparative strength and breadth of the companies&#8217; brand capital.</p>
<p>&#8220;Brand now functions as the primary container of intangible value. Factors once viewed only internally by company management, such as company culture and innovation strength, are now broadcast to customers regularly through brand,&#8221; said Patrick T. Davis, chief executive officer of Davis Brand Capital, based in Atlanta. Studies by the Federal Reserve place yearly investment in intangibles by U.S. companies at more than $1 trillion. &#8220;We believe it is increasingly important to track the companies excelling in the management of these intangibles,&#8221; said Davis.</p>
<p>Apple (AAPL) tops the list for the first time, moving up from #12 in &#8217;09 and #7 in &#8217;10. The company&#8217;s rise in this year&#8217;s rankings was driven largely by its competitive performance and added brand value. Customers and investors alike continue to reward Apple for the transformative innovations it brings to the world through its marketing and business prowess.</p>
<p>IBM (IBM) ranks second this year, after holding the top spot for two consecutive years. Google (GOOG) enjoyed a meteoric rise from #11 in &#8217;09 to #4 in this year&#8217;s ranking. Rounding out the top five, Microsoft (MSFT) remained at #3 again this year, and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) dropped from the #2 spot in &#8217;10 to #5.</p>
<p>As in prior years, the ranking is dominated by technology leaders, which comprise nearly 30 percent of the ranked companies. Intel (INTC) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) also make the 2011 ranking, placing #8 and #10 respectively.</p>
<p>&#8220;Technology is the infrastructure of our daily lives now, and these companies are exceptional at delivering value, building trust and creating culture. They also tend to be more transparent and use their technologies to convey their strengths,&#8221; said Davis.</p>
<p>Automakers also are well represented on this year&#8217;s rankings. Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) reappears at #20, signifying a rebound in consumer trust and financial performance after a wave of high-profile product recalls and related controversy. Last year, the company dropped from the &#8217;10 ranking entirely, despite having a strong showing in &#8217;09 at #8. BMW (BMW-DE) moves up one position to #11 this year, and Daimler (DAI-DE) debuts on the ranking at #15. Volkswagen (VOW-DE) moves down four spots this year from #21 to #17. Both Ford (F) and Honda (HMC) drop from the &#8217;11 rankings after holding the #23 and #18 spots respectively in &#8217;10.</p>
<p>Coca-Cola continues its steady climb up the rankings, moving from #16 in &#8217;09 to #14 in &#8217;10 and landing at #9 on this year&#8217;s ranking. Arch-rival PepsiCo narrows Coca-Cola&#8217;s lead in &#8217;11 with its #12 ranking, moving up from #24 in &#8217;09 (not ranked in &#8217;10) and representing the largest two-year gain of any brand on the list.</p>
<p>After improving its ranking from #10 in &#8217;09 to #5 in &#8217;10, discount retailer Wal-Mart (WMT) drops the most of any other company in &#8217;11 both in terms of its two-year and year-over-year performance, ranking #24. Samsung Electronics has the second-largest drop in year-over-year performance, falling from #8 in &#8217;10 to #23 in &#8217;11.</p>
<p>Though still dealing with the aftermath of the global economic crisis and forward-looking financial anxiety, several financial services companies do appear on the &#8217;11 ranking. Citigroup makes its debut on this year&#8217;s list at #16. Wells Fargo also debuts on the &#8217;11 rankings at #25, and Goldman Sachs drops two spots from #16 in &#8217;10 to #18. Financial services firms JPMorgan and HSBC drop from this year&#8217;s rankings entirely, after holding the #11 and #22 spots respectively in &#8217;10.</p>
<p>This year, the Davis Brand Capital Scores have a much tighter range than previous years&#8217; rankings, indicating collectively stronger performance for the 25 brands included on the list. &#8220;More than ever, companies are realizing the importance of proactively managing their collection of intangibles,&#8221; said Davis. &#8220;The companies listed on the 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 represent the best-of-the-best globally, and inclusion anywhere on the list is testament to their exceptional power and far-reaching influence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many major consumer and packaged goods brands are notably absent from the list. &#8220;Excellence in traditional product brand management alone is no longer enough,&#8221; said Davis. &#8220;Big consumer brands build great value in the marketplace and with the consumer, but that is only one component of brand capital. And it does not necessarily mean the brands represent companies that excel in managing broader intangibles. A more holistic approach is needed to earn a place among the extraordinary companies on this list.&#8221;</p>
<p>The 2011 Davis Brand Capital 25 ranking is based on a study of 10 distinct data sets. It is a compilation and analysis of annual performance rankings published in industry-leading and specialized annual lists, plus Davis Brand Capital&#8217;s proprietary processes and analysis. Each of the five key areas of brand capital is given equal importance to achieve an integrated, balanced evaluation.</p>
<p>Prior to the Davis Brand Capital 25, annual brand performance rankings were not evaluated and aggregated to reveal the comparative strength of companies&#8217; brand capital. &#8220;It is essential now for senior executives to understand that brand capital reflects a collection of key intangible attributes determining systemic success. Well-managed brand capital signals the overall health and effectiveness of a business today,&#8221; said Davis.</p>
<p>The ranking will be updated yearly, with the 2012 Davis Brand Capital 25 released in January, 2013.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/07/apple-edges-out-ibm-to-become-the-top-brand-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/apple-logo-sign-01-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM and HTC partner to lure the enterprise market to Android</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/ibm-and-htc-partner-to-lure-the-enterprise-market-to-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/ibm-and-htc-partner-to-lure-the-enterprise-market-to-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM and HTC are working together to make Android a more attractive platform for the enterprise market. Executives from both companies recently demoed IBM software running on HTC smartphones and tablets during IBM&#8217;s Lotusphere and Connect conference, TechWeek Europe said recently. &#8220;It’s only been really relatively recently that HTC has broken into the enterprise space,&#8221; HTC&#8217;s executive director Global Enterprise and Services David Jaegar said. &#8220;We’re driving toward that magic 100-million device number globally. We see IBM as the gold standard for an enterprise partnership. We want to make sure if IBM is talking about Android or tablets, HTC is in the conversation.&#8221; HTC is focusing specifically on security applications, Jaegar explained recently. The Taiwan-based phone and tablet maker also said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/ibm-and-htc-partner-to-lure-the-enterprise"><img class="size-full wp-image-117095 aligncenter" title="htc-logo-sign-legend-5" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/htc-logo-sign-legend-5.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="451" /></a></center>
<p>IBM and HTC are working together to make Android a more attractive platform for the enterprise market. Executives from both companies recently demoed IBM software running on HTC smartphones and tablets during IBM&#8217;s Lotusphere and Connect conference, <em>TechWeek Europe</em> said recently. &#8220;It’s only been really relatively recently that HTC has broken into the enterprise space,&#8221; HTC&#8217;s executive director Global Enterprise and Services David Jaegar said. &#8220;We’re driving toward that magic 100-million device number globally. We see IBM as the gold standard for an enterprise partnership. We want to make sure if IBM is talking about Android or tablets, HTC is in the conversation.&#8221; HTC is focusing specifically on security applications, Jaegar explained recently. The Taiwan-based phone and tablet maker also said it is working with third-party developers and businesses to help firms create custom applications for HTC tablets.<span id="more-123967"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/htc-joins-ibm-to-bolster-sales-with-an-enterprise-mobility-initiative-55317">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/ibm-and-htc-partner-to-lure-the-enterprise-market-to-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/htc-logo-sign-legend-5-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google acquires 217 new patents from IBM</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/03/google-acquires-217-new-patents-from-ibm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/03/google-acquires-217-new-patents-from-ibm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=119522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently purchased 217 patents from IBM, including 28 published patents and 188 of IBM&#8217;s granted patents. The transaction was posted in the United States Patent and Trademark Office&#8217;s assignment database on Tuesday. SEO by the Sea said the patents are related to email administration, IM apps, video conferencing, presentation software and more. It remains unclear how much Google paid for the patents, but the company also purchased 1,000 patents from IBM in July of last year and another 1,023 in September. Google is currently in the process of acquiring Motorola Mobility as well, which has a vast patent portfolio that Google said will help it defend its Android partners from patent lawsuits filed by litigious competitors such as Microsoft and Apple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/03/google-acquires-217-new-patents-from-ibm"><img class="size-full wp-image-113010 aligncenter" title="Google-sign-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-sign-logo.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="395" /></a></center>
<p>Google recently purchased 217 patents from IBM, including 28 published patents and 188 of IBM&#8217;s granted patents. The transaction was posted in the United States Patent and Trademark Office&#8217;s assignment database on Tuesday<em>. SEO by the Sea</em> said the patents are related to email administration, IM apps, video conferencing, presentation software and more. It remains unclear how much Google paid for the patents, but the company also <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war/">purchased 1,000 patents from IBM in July of last year</a> and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/09/15/google-acquires-another-1023-patents-from-ibm/">another 1,023 in September</a>. Google is currently in the process of acquiring Motorola Mobility as well<em>,</em> which has a vast patent portfolio that Google said will <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/15/google-ceo-larry-page-explains-reasoning-behind-motorola-acquisition-spoiler-patents/">help it defend its Android partners</a> from patent lawsuits filed by litigious competitors such as Microsoft and Apple.<span id="more-119522"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.seobythesea.com/2012/01/ibm-assigns-patent-filings-to-google/#more-7107">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/03/google-buoys-its-patent-portfolio-with-217-more-filings-acquired/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/03/google-acquires-217-new-patents-from-ibm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-sign-logo-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Friday 2011 spending sets new record</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/28/black-friday-2011-spending-sets-new-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/28/black-friday-2011-spending-sets-new-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ShopperTrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=114114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early reports from three separate firms suggest that Black Friday retail sales set a new record in 2011. Online sales growth was massive according to estimates from both IBM and comScore; the former reported on Saturday that online Black Friday sales grew 24.3% over 2010 and total Black Friday spending rose 39.3% over last year. Meanwhile, comScore&#8217;s data shows that online spending this past Friday grew 26% from Black Friday 2010 to $816 million. Offline, market research firm ShopperTrak said retail foot traffic rose 5.1% year-over-year on Black Friday 2011, and spending was up 6.6% to a record $11.4 billion. &#8220;This is the largest year-over-year gain in ShopperTrak&#8217;s National Retail Sales Estimate for Black Friday since the 8.3 percent increase]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/28/black-friday-2011-spending-sets-new-record"><img class="size-full wp-image-67490 aligncenter" title="shopping-rush" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/shopping-rush.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="343" /></a></center>
<p>Early reports from three separate firms suggest that Black Friday retail sales set a new record in 2011. Online sales growth was massive according to estimates from both IBM and comScore; the former reported on Saturday that online Black Friday sales grew 24.3% over 2010 and total Black Friday spending rose 39.3% over last year. Meanwhile, comScore&#8217;s data shows that online spending this past Friday grew 26% from Black Friday 2010 to $816 million. Offline, market research firm ShopperTrak said retail foot traffic rose 5.1% year-over-year on Black Friday 2011, and spending was up 6.6% to a record $11.4 billion. &#8220;This is the largest year-over-year gain in ShopperTrak&#8217;s National Retail Sales Estimate for Black Friday since the 8.3 percent increase we saw between 2007 and 2006,&#8221; ShopperTrak CEO Bill Martin said in a statement. &#8220;Still, it&#8217;s just one day. It remains to be seen whether consumers will sustain this behavior through the holiday shopping season.&#8221; Press releases from both IBM and comScore follow below.<span id="more-114114"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Record Online Thanksgiving Day Shopping Paves Way for Strong Black Friday Retail Sales, Reports IBM</strong></p>
<p><em>Mobile Devices Including the iPhone and iPad Account for 14.3 Percent Of All Black Friday Online Retail Traffic</em></p>
<p>ARMONK, N.Y., Nov. 26, 2011 /PRNewswire/ &#8211;U.S. shoppers took advantage of early sales this holiday driving a 39.3 percent increase in online Thanksgiving day spending while setting the stage for 24.3 percent online growth on Black Friday compared to the same period last year, according to cloud-based analytics findings by IBM (NYSE: IBM).</p>
<p>As part of IBM&#8217;s Smarter Commerce initiative, IBM&#8217;s online retail benchmark study reveals the following trends as of 12:00 am PST:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumer Spending Increases:</strong> Strong Thanksgiving shopping carried over into Black Friday with online sales increasing 24.3 percent annually.</li>
<li><strong>The Mobile Bargain Hunter:</strong> Black Friday witnessed the arrival of the mobile deal seeker who embraced their devices as a research tool for in-store and online bargains. Mobile traffic increased to 14.3 percent on Black Friday 2011 compared to 5.6 percent in 2010.</li>
<li><strong>Mobile Sales:</strong> Sales on mobile devices surged to 9.8 percent from 3.2 percent year over year.</li>
<li><strong>The Apple Shopper:</strong> Mobile shopping was led by Apple, with the iPhone and iPad ranking one and two for consumers shopping on mobile devices (5.4 percent and 4.8 percent respectively). Android came in third at 4.1 percent. Collectively iPhone and iPad accounted for 10.2 percent of all online retail traffic on Black Friday.</li>
<li><strong>The iPad Factor:</strong> Shoppers using the iPad led to more retail purchases more often per visit than other mobile devices with conversion rates reaching 4.6 percent compared to 2.8 percent for overall mobile devices.</li>
<li><strong>Surgical Shopping Goes Mobile:</strong> Mobile shoppers demonstrated a laser focus that surpassed that of other online shoppers with a 41.3 percent bounce rate on mobile devices versus online shopping rates of 33.1 percent.</li>
<li><strong>The Social Influence:</strong> Shoppers referred from Social Networks generated 0.53 percent of all online sales on Black Friday. Facebook led the pack, accounting for 75 percent of all traffic from social networks.</li>
<li><strong>Social Media Chatter:</strong> Boosted by a 110 percent increase in discussion volume compared to 2010, top discussion topics on social media sites immediately before Friday showed a focus on the part of consumers to share tips on how to avoid the rush. Topics included out-of-stock concerns, waiting times and parking, and a spike in positive sentiment around Cyber-Monday sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;This year marked Thanksgiving&#8217;s emergence as the first big spending day of the 2011 holiday season with a record number of consumers shifting their focus from turkey to tablets and the search for the best deals,&#8221; said John Squire, Chief Strategy Officer, IBM Smarter Commerce. &#8220;This momentum continued into Black Friday where the big winners were those retailers that delivered a smarter commerce experience with compelling, relevant deals that people could easily access from their channel of choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Online Retail Categories</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Department stores</strong> once again offered a vast array of compelling deals and promotions that caught the attention of consumers. As a result, department stores sales were up 59.0 percent from this time last year.</li>
<li><strong>Home goods</strong> also reported a 48.8 percent increase in sales from Black Friday 2010, an indication that many consumers are shifting their attention toward the home this holiday season.</li>
<li><strong>Apparel sales</strong> were also strong this holiday with Black Friday numbers showing an increase of 47.2 percent over 2010.</li>
<li><strong>Health and Beauty</strong> sales were strong as consumers showed a desire to pamper themselves this year. On Black Friday, online sales were up 34.2 percent year over year.</li>
</ul>
<p>Today&#8217;s news is based on finding from the IBM Coremetrics fourth annual Black Friday Benchmark which tracks more than a million transactions a day, analyzing terabytes of raw data from 500 retailers nationwide. With this data IBM helps retailers better understand and respond to their customers – across the organization – improving sourcing, inventory management, marketing, sales, and services programs.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>Black Friday Boasts $816 Million in U.S. Online Holiday Spending, Up 26 Percent vs. Year Ago</strong></p>
<p><em>More than 50 Million Americans Visited Online Retail Sites on Black Friday</em></p>
<p><em>Thanksgiving Day Online Spending Jumps 18 Percent to $479 Million</em></p>
<p><strong>RESTON, VA, November 27, 2011 </strong>– comScore (NASDAQ : SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today reported U.S. retail e-commerce spending for the first 25 days of the November – December 2011 holiday season. For the holiday season-to-date, $12.7 billion has been spent online, marking a 15-percent increase versus the corresponding days last year. Black Friday (November 25) saw $816 million in online sales, making it the heaviest online spending day to date in 2011 and representing a 26-percent increase versus Black Friday 2010. Thanksgiving Day (November 24), while traditionally a lighter day for online holiday spending, achieved a strong 18-percent increase to $479 million.</p>
<table width="407" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" width="433"><strong>2011 Holiday Season To Date vs. Corresponding Days* in 2010</strong><br />
<strong>Non-Travel (Retail) Spending</strong><br />
<strong>Excludes Auctions and Large Corporate Purchases</strong><br />
<strong>Total U.S. – Home &amp; Work Locations</strong><br />
<strong>Source: comScore, Inc.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="217"></td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="216"><strong>Millions ($)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="72"><strong>2010</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="72"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="72"><strong>Percent Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="217">November 1 – 25</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$11,093</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$12,737</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="217">Thanksgiving Day (Nov. 24)</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$407</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$479</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="217">Black Friday (Nov. 25)</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$648</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">$816</td>
<td valign="top" width="72">26%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>*Corresponding days based on corresponding shopping days (November 2 thru November 26, 2010)</em></p>
<p>“Despite some analysts’ predictions that the flurry of brick-and-mortar retailers opening their doors early for Black Friday would pull dollars from online retail, we still saw a banner day for e-commerce with more than $800 million in spending,” said comScore chairman, Gian Fulgoni. “With brick-and-mortar retail also reporting strong gains on Black Friday, it’s clear that the heavy promotional activity had a positive impact on both channels. We now turn our attention to Cyber Monday, a day that Shop.org says will see eight-in-ten retailers running special online promotions. Last year, Cyber Monday was the heaviest day of online spending ever, with sales exceeding $1 Billion, and we fully expect to see another record set this year.”</p>
<p><strong>Black Friday Bargains Boost Web Browsing Behavior</strong></p>
<p>As the online channel increasingly influences offline shopping behavior, consumers turned to Black Friday sites on the web to conduct research in advance of the day’s events. comScore analyzed several Black Friday deal sites for the five days ending Black Friday (Nov. 21-25, 2011) compared to the corresponding days last year, finding that bfads.net led the pack with 3.9 million unique visitors, up 51 percent versus last year. TheBlackFriday.com followed with 3.2 million visitors while also posting the strongest year-over-year growth at 137 percent.</p>
<table width="411" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" width="521"><strong>Unique Visitors to Selected Sites Featuring Black Friday Deals</strong><br />
<strong>Nov. 21-25, 2011 vs. Nov. 22-26, 2010</strong><br />
<strong>Total U.S. – Home &amp; Work Locations</strong><br />
<strong>Source: comScore, Inc.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="171"></td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="351"><strong>Unique Visitors (000)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="118"><strong>Nov. 22-26, 2010</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"><strong>Nov. 21-25, 2011</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="115"><strong>Percent Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">bfads.net</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">2,607</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">3,926</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">theblackfriday.com</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">1,364</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">3,234</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">137%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">blackfriday2011.com*</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">1,612</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">1,854</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">blackfriday.com</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">668</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">621</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">-7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">blackfriday.fm</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">399</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">532</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="171">gottadeal.com</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">270</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">424</td>
<td valign="top" width="115">57%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>*Site was known as BlackFriday2010.com in 2010</em><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Amazon Ranks #1 Among Online Retailers on Black Friday</strong></p>
<p>Fifty million Americans visited online retail sites on Black Friday, representing an increase of 35 percent versus year ago. Each of the top five retail sites achieved double-digit gains in visitors vs. last year, led by Amazon. Walmart ranked second, followed by Best Buy, Target and Apple.</p>
<table width="320" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top" width="307"><strong>Most Visited Retailer Properties on Black Friday</strong><br />
<strong>Excludes Auction Sites (e.g. eBay)</strong><br />
<strong>Black Friday 2011 vs. Black Friday 2010</strong><br />
<strong>Total U.S. – Home &amp; Work Locations</strong><br />
<strong>Source: comScore, Inc.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top" width="307"><strong>Retail Property</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="22">1</td>
<td valign="top" width="285">Amazon</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="22">2</td>
<td valign="top" width="285">Walmart</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="22">3</td>
<td valign="top" width="285">Best Buy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="22">4</td>
<td valign="top" width="285">Target</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="22">5</td>
<td valign="top" width="285">Apple</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>“Each of the top online retailers generated significantly greater Black Friday activity compared to last year,” added Mr. Fulgoni. “Amazon.com once again led the pack, with 50 percent more visitors than any other retailer, while also showing the highest growth rate versus last year. However, it is telling that the top multi-channel retailers also showed strong growth in visitors, demonstrating the importance of the online channel to the retail industry as a whole.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/28/black-friday-2011-spending-sets-new-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/shopping-rush-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP may decide fate of webOS tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/08/hp-may-decide-fate-of-webos-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/08/hp-may-decide-fate-of-webos-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research in Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=111794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP is reportedly holding a meeting Tuesday night during which it may decide the fate of its webOS mobile platform, The Verge reported on Tuesday. The meeting will take place after the market closes and will be led by CEO Meg Whitman at 4:30 p.m. PST. According to Reuters, HP has been toying with the idea of selling the unit and possible suitors include Amazon, Intel, Oracle, Research In Motion and IBM. The potential sale will likely fetch far less than the $1.2 billion that HP paid to acquire Palm in 2010. HP originally said it was killing off webOS hardware in August, and recent reports have suggested HP will soon put the final nail in the webOS coffin and subsequently lay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/08/hp-may-decide-fate-of-webos-tonight"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-92986" title="HP-Veer-webOS-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HP-Veer-webOS-2110608144420.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="505" /></a></center>
<p>HP is reportedly holding a meeting Tuesday night during which it may decide the fate of its webOS mobile platform, <em>The Verge</em> reported on Tuesday. The meeting will take place after the market closes and will be led by CEO Meg Whitman at 4:30 p.m. PST. According to <em>Reuters, </em>HP has been toying with the idea of selling the unit and possible suitors include Amazon, Intel, Oracle, Research In Motion and IBM. The potential sale will likely fetch far less than the $1.2 billion that HP paid to acquire Palm in 2010. HP originally said it was <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/18/rip-webos-hp-kills-off-its-mobile-operating-system/">killing off webOS hardware</a> in August, and recent reports have suggested HP will soon put the final nail in the webOS coffin and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/28/hp-may-layoff-500-employees-finally-bury-webos/">subsequently lay off 500 webOS employees</a>. <span id="more-111794"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/8/2547488/hp-all-hands-webos-fate">Read</a> [The Verge] <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/07/us-hewlettpackard-webos-idUSTRE7A66UM20111107">Read</a> [Reuters]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/08/hp-may-decide-fate-of-webos-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HP-Veer-webOS-2110608144420-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google acquires another 1,023 patents from IBM</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/09/15/google-acquires-another-1023-patents-from-ibm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/09/15/google-acquires-another-1023-patents-from-ibm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=103813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in July — less than a week after Google&#8217;s general counsel Kevin Walker took to the company&#8217;s blog to launch a war of words against rivals and their patent trolling — Google bought more than 1,000 patents from IBM&#8217;s portfolio. This past Tuesday, the U.S. Patent Office published records showing that the tech giant has purchased another 1,023 patents from IBM, this time covering technologies that range from &#8220;COMMUNICATIONS ON A NETWORK&#8221; to &#8220;SELF-ALIGNED DOUBLE-GATE MOSFET BY SELECTIVE EPITAXY AND SILICON WAFER BONDING TECHNIQUES.&#8221; The IP transfer took place last month, Bloomberg reports. This move is the latest in a long line of steps Google is taking to protect Android and its partners, the most high-profile of which is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/09/15/google-acquires-another-1023-patents-from-ibm"><img class="size-full wp-image-85603 aligncenter" title="google-sign" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/google-sign110415184745.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="353" /></a></center>
<p>Back in July — less than a week after Google&#8217;s general counsel Kevin Walker took to the company&#8217;s blog to launch <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/26/software-patents-gumming-up-smartphone-innovation-googles-general-counsel-says/">a war of words</a> against rivals and their patent trolling — Google <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war/">bought more than 1,000 patents from IBM&#8217;s portfolio</a>. This past Tuesday, the U.S. Patent Office published records showing that the tech giant has purchased another 1,023 patents from IBM, this time covering technologies that range from &#8220;COMMUNICATIONS ON A NETWORK&#8221; to &#8220;SELF-ALIGNED DOUBLE-GATE MOSFET BY SELECTIVE EPITAXY AND SILICON WAFER BONDING TECHNIQUES.&#8221; The IP transfer took place last month, <em>Bloomberg</em> reports. This move is the latest in a long line of steps Google is taking to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/16/is-googles-motorola-buy-the-only-way-to-save-android/">protect Android and its partners</a>, the most high-profile of which is <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/15/google-to-acquire-motorola-mobility-for-12-5-billion/">its current effort to acquire Motorola Mobility</a> and its massive portfolio of 25,000 issued and pending patents.<span id="more-103813"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-14/google-purchases-1-023-patents-from-ibm-to-bolster-portfolio.html">Bloomberg</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/q?db=pat&amp;reel=026894&amp;frame=0001&amp;page=1">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/09/15/google-acquires-another-1023-patents-from-ibm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/google-sign110415184745-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google hates smartphone patent wars, but buys 1,000 new patents to go to war</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=98347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s general counsel Kent Walker apparently doesn&#8217;t see eye to eye with the rest of his company. “The tech industry has a significant problem,” Walker said earlier this week. “Software patents are kind of gumming up the works of innovation.” According to SEO by the Sea however, Google purchased 1,030 patents from IBM just two weeks before Walker made those comments. According to the report, the patents purchased cover a wide rage of IP, &#8220;from the fabrication and architecture of memory and microprocessing chips, to other areas of computer architecture including servers and routers as well.&#8221; Still more patents cover specific database functions, various aspects of object-oriented programming and even some business processes. The terms of Google&#8217;s acquisition have not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war"><img class="size-full wp-image-78245 aligncenter" title="Google-sign-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-sign-logo110228125614.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="395" /></a></center>
<p>Google’s general counsel Kent Walker apparently doesn&#8217;t see eye to eye with the rest of his company. “The tech industry has a significant problem,” Walker said <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/26/software-patents-gumming-up-smartphone-innovation-googles-general-counsel-says/">earlier this week</a>. “Software patents are kind of gumming up the works of innovation.” According to <em>SEO by the Sea</em><span> however, Google purchased 1,030 patents from IBM just two weeks before Walker made those comments. According to the report, the patents purchased cover a wide rage of IP, &#8220;from the fabrication and architecture of memory and <span>microprocessing</span> chips, to other areas of computer architecture including servers and routers as well.&#8221; Still more patents cover specific database functions, various aspects of object-oriented programming and even some business processes. The terms of <span>Google&#8217;s</span> acquisition have not been disclosed.</span><span id="more-98347"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seobythesea.com/2011/07/google-acquires-ibm-patents-in-july/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/29/google-hates-smartphone-patent-wars-but-buys-1000-new-patents-to-go-to-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-sign-logo110228125614-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throwback Thursday: IBM</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/16/throwback-thursday-ibm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/16/throwback-thursday-ibm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Throwback Thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=93924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BGR&#8217;s Throwback Thursday segment is typically reserved for extinct tech, but this week we make an exception. On June 16th, 1911 — one hundred years ago today — Charles Ranlett Flint merged three companies to form the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company. Headquartered in New York City, CTR manufactured and sold scales, card-punch machines, meat slicers and a variety of other products that have long since been replaced by several generations of improved offerings. CTR changed its name to International Business Machines Corporation, or IBM, on February 14th, 1924, to better align its name with its wide range of products. IBM would hit its stride building tabulating devices, and it was at the forefront of developing the PCs we now take for granted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/16/throwback-thursday-ibm/"><img class="size-full wp-image-93925 aligncenter" title="ibm-sign" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ibm-sign110616185421.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="430" /></a></center>
<p>BGR&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bgr.com/category/sections/throwback-thursday/">Throwback Thursday</a> segment is typically reserved for extinct tech, but this week we make an exception. On June 16th, 1911 — one hundred years ago today — Charles Ranlett Flint merged three companies to form the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company. Headquartered in New York City, CTR manufactured and sold scales, card-punch machines, meat slicers and a variety of other products that have long since been replaced by several generations of improved offerings. CTR changed its name to International Business Machines Corporation, or IBM, on February 14th, 1924, to better align its name with its wide range of products. IBM would hit its stride building tabulating devices, and it was at the forefront of developing the PCs we now take for granted. Now, 100 years later with a market capitalization of just under $200 billion, IBM remains a leader in the technology space, producing software and hardware that will shape the future of computing. Happy 100th, IBM, and here&#8217;s to 100 more.</p>
<p><em>BGR’s Throwback Thursday is a weekly series covering our (and your) favorite gadgets, games, and software of yesterday and yesteryear.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/16/throwback-thursday-ibm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ibm-sign110616185421-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple surpasses Google as most valuable brand in the world</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/09/apple-surpasses-google-as-most-valuable-brand-in-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/09/apple-surpasses-google-as-most-valuable-brand-in-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 12:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=88472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has surpassed Google as world&#8217;s most valuable brand, according to advertising firm WPP&#8217;s &#8220;BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands&#8221; study. Apple&#8217;s brand value has ballooned 859% since 2006, and increased 84% to $153.3 billion this year. Tech companies dominate the rankings: AT&#38;T, China Mobile, IBM, and Microsoft all have spots in the top-10 most valuable brands list, and McDonald&#8217;s is the only non-tech brand in the top-5. Google had reigned supreme for the past four years before being displaced by Apple, and Amazon surpassed Walmart to become the No. 1 retailer. Hit the jump for the full report from WPP. Apple becomes world&#8217;s most valuable brand, says WPP&#8217;s BrandZ 9 May, 2011 Emerging markets account for 19 of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/09/apple-surpasses-google-as-most-valuable-brand-in-the-world"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-84800" title="Carbon Fiber Apple Logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Apple_Carbon_Fiber_Wallpaper_by_daveysaurus110411210738.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="293" /></a></center>
<p>Apple has surpassed Google as world&#8217;s most valuable brand, according to advertising firm WPP&#8217;s &#8220;BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands&#8221; study. Apple&#8217;s brand value has ballooned 859% since 2006, and increased 84% to $153.3 billion this year. Tech companies dominate the rankings: AT&amp;T, China Mobile, IBM, and Microsoft all have spots in the top-10 most valuable brands list, and McDonald&#8217;s is the only non-tech brand in the top-5. Google had reigned supreme for the past four years before being displaced by Apple, and Amazon surpassed Walmart to become the No. 1 retailer. Hit the jump for the full report from WPP.</p>
<p><span id="more-88472"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Apple becomes world&#8217;s most valuable brand, says WPP&#8217;s BrandZ</strong></p>
<p>9 May, 2011<br />
<em>Emerging markets account for 19 of the top 100 brands  according to WPP company Millward Brown Optimor in its 2011 study of the  Most Valuable Global Brands<br />
</em><br />
<strong>NEW YORK</strong> –  Registering a staggering 84 percent increase in value over the past  year, Apple has emerged as the most valuable brand in the world, ending  the four-year reign of Google at the top of the table in the sixth  annual BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands study.<br />
The Apple  brand, as calculated by Millward Brown Optimor, a WPP company, has  increased in value by 859 percent since 2006 and now stands at $153.3  billion. Other key findings in the study are that during the economic  recovery of the last year, the combined value of all the brands in the  top 100 has risen by 17 percent and is now worth $2.4 trillion. In terms  of geography, according to the 2011 BrandZ study, 19 of the Top 100  brands now originate in “BRICs” markets, versus only two in 2006.</p>
<p>“The  importance of brand for global business success is becoming  increasingly significant,” said David Roth at WPP. “In the last year,  the global economy shifted from recovery to real growth, the combined  value of all brands in the Top 100 ranking has risen by 64 percent since  2006 and is now worth $2.4 trillion. Strong brands, while not immune to  the vicissitudes of the market, are more protected, prepared,  resourceful and resilient.”</p>
<p>The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable  Global Brands study, commissioned by WPP and conducted by Millward Brown  Optimor, identifies and ranks the world’s most valuable 100 brands by  their dollar value, an analysis based on financial data combined with  consumer measures of brand equity.</p>
<p><strong>The Most Valuable Global Brands 2011<br />
</strong></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Rank</strong></td>
<td><strong>Brand </strong></td>
<td><strong>Value in $ million </strong></td>
<td><strong>Brand value change from 2010</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>153,285</td>
<td>+ 84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>111,498</td>
<td>- 2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>IBM</td>
<td>100,849</td>
<td>+ 17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>McDonald&#8217;s*</td>
<td>81,016</td>
<td>+ 23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>78,243</td>
<td>+2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Coca-Cola</td>
<td>73,752</td>
<td>+8 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>at&amp;t</td>
<td>69,916</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Marlboro</td>
<td>67,522</td>
<td>+18 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>China Mobile</td>
<td>57,326</td>
<td>+9 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>GE</td>
<td>50,318</td>
<td>+12 %</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><sub>*The Brand Value of Coca-Cola includes Lites, Diets and Zero<br />
</sub><br />
“Our  brand valuations are a powerful measure of an organization’s ability to  create real and lasting value for shareholders.” said Eileen Campbell,  CEO of brand research company Millward Brown. “By nurturing its brand  and constantly innovating, Apple is able to command a high price premium  and weather economic turbulence, providing a global business success  story that other brands can learn from.”</p>
<p>“Business leaders can  embrace brand management as a critical competency for building long-term  financial value,” she added. “Compared with an overall improvement of  13 percent in the world’s equity markets during 2010, the best brands  grew their value 30 percent faster.<br />
Other key findings highlighted in this year’s research report include:</p>
<p>• <strong>One in five brands is from the BRICs</strong>:  This year, 19 brands come from emerging markets compared to two in 2006  and 13 in 2010. The growing presence of brands from BRICs in this  global ranking highlights the expanding purchasing power of people in  these countries. While many of these brands are buoyed by the size of  their local customer base, many more now have international ambition  including Petrobras in Brazil (No. 61 in the ranking with a brand value  of $13.4 billion); ICICI Bank in India (No. 53 and worth $14.9 billion)  and China’s largest search engine Baidu. Now listed on the NASDAQ index,  Baidu has a brand value of $22.5 billion and moves up 46 places in the  ranking to number 29. Despite these successes, consumers in the BRIC  regions continue to favor Western brands. Louis Vuitton, for example,  (for which Brazil is its second-largest market) benefited from the new  energy and confidence in the BRICs region. Its 23 percent growth in  brand value to $24.3 billion has helped this luxury retailer achieve  26th place in the ranking, a three-spot increase from 2010.</p>
<p>• <strong>Heritage brands stay relevant in a technology age</strong>:  Coca-Cola (No. 6), GE (No. 10), IBM (No. 3) and McDonald’s (No. 4),  stand out in this study of global brand strength as brands that have  survived for more than 50 years. Leadership, strategy and tactics aside,  what all of these companies have in common is their use of brand to  remain relevant to consumers and drive global business success.</p>
<p>• <strong>Technology and telecom brands dominate the ranking</strong>:  Technology brands, which make up one-third of the Top 100 brands,  continue to demonstrate their relevance in our daily lives. While Apple  leads the ranking, it is followed in second place by Google, with a  brand value of $111.5 billion, and IBM in third place with a brand value  of $100.9 billion. Facebook makes its debut in the Top 100 ranking this  year at No. 35 with the highest increase in brand value, 246 percent,  making the brand worth $19.1 billion. Online retailer Amazon also edged  past Walmart to become the No. 1 retail brand and 14th overall, with a  37 percent rise in brand value to $37.6 billion.</p>
<p>• <strong>Fast food, luxury and technology brands led brand value appreciation</strong>:  Each of the 13 market sectors covered in this study grew in value over  the last year. Fast food led the sector growth (22 percent) followed by  luxury (19 percent) and technology (18 percent). The oil and gas sector  experienced the slowest rate of growth (1 percent).</p>
<p>• <strong>Tech and convergence create brand interdependencies</strong>:  Brands are ever more dependent on their use of technology to win  consumers’ hearts and minds. The brand values of Burberry, Chanel, Louis  Vuitton and Coca-Cola all benefited from their use of technology for  example by harnessing social media and apps. At the same time, the  dependencies demonstrated in the physical world between applications,  devices and operating platforms are creating similar branded  interdependencies. Brands that are aware of the risks can leverage these  associations to drive value and growth.</p>
<p>• <strong>Toyota reclaims position as most valuable car brand</strong> demonstrating the power of strong brands to recover from the most  fundamental challenges to product efficacy and reputation. Toyota’s  brand, which is rated by consumers as “great value,” rose 11 percent to  $24.1 billion.</p>
<p>The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands  study is the only valuation in the world that takes into account what  people think about the brands they buy alongside rigorous analysis of  financial data, market valuations, analyst reports and risk profiles.  The research report, which is available online, includes a ranking and  analysis of the Top 10 most valuable brands for key regions of the world  and 13 market sectors. <strong>Download the complete BrandZ ranking</strong>,  including regional and category breakdowns. The rankings and a great  deal more are also available as a free application for the iPhone, iPad,  Nokia, BlackBerry and Android from <strong>www.brandz.com/mobile </strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/09/apple-surpasses-google-as-most-valuable-brand-in-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Apple_Carbon_Fiber_Wallpaper_by_daveysaurus110411210738-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gartner: Operating systems a $30.4B business in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/28/gartner-operating-systems-a-30-4b-business-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/28/gartner-operating-systems-a-30-4b-business-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=87189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operating systems are big business. But just how big you ask? According to research firm Gartner, sales of server and desktop operating systems totalled nearly $30.4 billion in 2010 alone. &#8220;As the global economy recovered, worldwide operating system (OS) revenue totaled $30.4 billion in 2010, a 7.8 percent increase from 2009,&#8221; explains Gartner. &#8220;Among client OSs, Mac OS was the fastest-growing subsegment in 2010 as the unit shipments of Mac desktop/laptop devices saw strong sales, although from a much-smaller basis. Windows client was still the largest client OS segment, with high-single-digit growth, particularly driven by adoption of Windows 7 and the imminent end of life (EOL) of Windows XP.&#8221; Oracle saw the largest percentage-growth year-over-year thanks to its acquisition of Sun Microsystems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/28/gartner-operating-systems-a-30-4b-business-in-2010"><img class="size-full wp-image-87202 aligncenter" title="2010 Operating System Business" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-27-at-2.12.02-PM110427181238.jpg" alt="" width="496" height="291" /></a></center>
<p style="text-align: left;">Operating systems are big business. But just how big you ask? According to research firm Gartner, sales of server and desktop operating systems totalled nearly $30.4 billion in 2010 alone. &#8220;As the global economy recovered, worldwide operating system (OS) revenue totaled $30.4 billion in 2010, a 7.8 percent increase from 2009,&#8221; explains Gartner. &#8220;Among client OSs, Mac OS was the fastest-growing subsegment in 2010 as the unit shipments of Mac desktop/laptop devices saw strong sales, although from a much-smaller basis. Windows client was still the largest client OS segment, with high-single-digit growth, particularly driven by adoption of Windows 7 and the imminent end of life (EOL) of Windows XP.&#8221; Oracle saw the largest percentage-growth year-over-year thanks to its acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Analysts are expecting the operating system revenues to continue to rise in 2011.<span id="more-87189"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1654914">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/28/gartner-operating-systems-a-30-4b-business-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-27-at-2.12.02-PM110427181238-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple gets failing grade from Greenpeace due to dirty new data center</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/22/apple-gets-failing-grade-from-greenpeace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/22/apple-gets-failing-grade-from-greenpeace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akamai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud-computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=86502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenpeace recently released a report titled How dirty is your data: A look at the energy choices that power cloud computing, which graded Amazon, Akamai, Apple, Facebook, Google, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo across three &#8220;green&#8221; categories: transparency, infrastructure siting, and mitigating strategy. While Greenpeace offered some praise to the Cupertino-based company for improving transparency and its efforts to move towards cleaner energy, it failed Apple in the &#8220;infrastructure siting,&#8221; category for choosing to build its new $1 billion iDataCenter — which requires enough energy to power 80,000 U.S. homes –  in North Carolina. &#8220;Apple&#8217;s decision to locate its iDataCenter in North Carolina, which has an electrical grid among the dirtiest in the country (61% coal, 31% nuclear) indicates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/22/apple-gets-failing-grade-from-greenpeace"><img class="size-full wp-image-86517 aligncenter" title="apple_NC_fail" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/apple_NC_fail110422125239.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="332" /></a></center>
<p>Greenpeace recently released a report titled <em>How dirty is your data: A look at the energy choices that power cloud computing</em>, which graded Amazon, Akamai, Apple, Facebook, Google, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo across three &#8220;green&#8221; categories: transparency, infrastructure siting, and mitigating strategy. While Greenpeace offered some praise to the Cupertino-based company for improving transparency and its efforts to move towards cleaner energy, it failed Apple in the &#8220;infrastructure siting,&#8221; category for choosing to build its new $1 billion iDataCenter — which requires enough energy to power 80,000 U.S. homes –  in North Carolina.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Apple&#8217;s decision to locate its iDataCenter in North Carolina, which has an electrical grid among the dirtiest in the country (61% coal, 31% nuclear) indicates a lack of a corporate commitment to clean energy supply for its cloud operations. The fact that the alternative location for Apple&#8217;s iDataCenter was Virginia, where electricity also comes from very dirty sources, is an indication that, in addition to tax incentives, access to inexpensive energy, regardless of its source, is a key driver in Apple&#8217;s site selection.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hit the jump for more, as well as the official report card.<span id="more-86502"></span></p>
<p>Facebook also received fail marks for infrastructure siting, and Twitter failed every single category. IBM was the top of the class, and Greenpace said it &#8220;should be recognized for its ongoing and comprehensive plan to reduce remissions, in addition to driving significant gains in IT efficiency.&#8221;</p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-86511 aligncenter" title="report_card" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/report_card110422124521.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="462" /></center>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/63214/greenpeace-slams-apple-over-datacenter-pollution/">9to5 Mac</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.greenpeace.org%2Finternational%2FGlobal%2Finternational%2Fpublications%2Fclimate%2F2011%2FCool%2520IT%2Fdirty-data-report-greenpeace.pdf">Read</a> (PDF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/22/apple-gets-failing-grade-from-greenpeace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/report_card110422124521-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM agrees to pay $10 million in bribery case</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/19/ibm-agrees-to-pay-10-million-in-bribery-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/19/ibm-agrees-to-pay-10-million-in-bribery-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=81429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International Business Machines (IBM)  has agreed to a settlement in a bribery case filed by the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that IBM, through its overseas subsidiaries, bribed Chinese and South Korean government officials with gifts, trips, and cash payments in exchange for government contracts from 1998 to 2009. According to the SEC&#8217;s filing, IBM used &#8220;local business partners and travel agencies as conduits for bribes or other improper payments to South Korean and Chinese government officials over long periods of time.&#8221; The government agency also notes that IBM tried to hide its wrongdoings by recording the transactions as legitimate business expenses. The terms of the settlement, which would see IBM paying out $10 million, is still awaiting court approval. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/?p=81429"><img class="size-full wp-image-81433 aligncenter" title="IBM" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ibm110318175600.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="402" /></a></center>
<p>International Business Machines (IBM)  has agreed to a settlement in a bribery case filed by the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that IBM, through its overseas subsidiaries, bribed Chinese and South Korean government officials with gifts, trips, and cash payments in exchange for government contracts from 1998 to 2009. According to the SEC&#8217;s filing, IBM used &#8220;local business partners and travel agencies as conduits for bribes or other improper payments to South Korean and Chinese government officials over long periods of time.&#8221; The government agency also notes that IBM tried to hide its wrongdoings by recording the transactions as legitimate business expenses. The terms of the settlement, which would see IBM paying out $10 million, is still awaiting court approval. <span id="more-81429"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sec-charges-ibm-with-bribery-2011-3?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Falleyinsider%2Fsilicon_alley_insider+%28Silicon+Alley+Insider%29">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/19/ibm-agrees-to-pay-10-million-in-bribery-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ibm110318175600-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux, U.S., Intel, IBM, and research dominate supercomputing</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/02/linux-u-s-intel-ibm-and-research-dominate-supercomputing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/02/linux-u-s-intel-ibm-and-research-dominate-supercomputing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=51106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC has released an interesting analysis of the world&#8217;s supercomputing prowess based on the June 2010 TOP500 Supercomputing list. The report shows, unsurprisingly, that Linux is the king of supercomputing OS&#8217; by an extremely large margin. Other fun facts from this months report include: the U.S. houses the most supercomputers (as well as the fastest), IBM is the largest manufacturer of supercomputing systems (HP is second), Intel is the most popular processor used in supercomputers (AMD is second), and the most widely used function for supercomputers is &#8220;research.&#8221; The fastest beast of the bunch, the Jaguar supercomputer, located in the U.S. at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has been clocked at 1.759 petaflops; only two other machines on the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10187248.stm"><img class="size-full wp-image-51109 aligncenter" title="June 2010 Supercomputing" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-01-at-11.02.42-AM.jpg" alt="June 2010 Supercomputing" width="628" height="327" /></a></center>
<p>The BBC has released an interesting analysis of the world&#8217;s supercomputing prowess based on the June 2010 TOP500 Supercomputing list. The report shows, unsurprisingly, that Linux is the king of supercomputing OS&#8217; by an extremely large margin. Other fun facts from this months report include: the U.S. houses the most supercomputers (as well as the fastest), IBM is the largest manufacturer of supercomputing systems (HP is second), Intel is the most popular processor used in supercomputers (AMD is second), and the most widely used function for supercomputers is &#8220;research.&#8221; The fastest beast of the bunch, the Jaguar supercomputer, located in the U.S. at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has been clocked at 1.759 petaflops; only two other machines on the list are clocked using petaflops. We&#8217;ve got all BBC article, complete with infographics, all queued up for you.<span id="more-51106"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10187248.stm">Read</a> &#8211; BBC</p>
<p><a href="http://www.top500.org/list/2010/06/100">Read</a> &#8211; TOP500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/06/02/linux-u-s-intel-ibm-and-research-dominate-supercomputing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-01-at-11.02.42-AM-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM hands out virus-infected USB sticks to security conference attendees</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/05/21/ibm-hands-out-virus-infected-usb-sticks-to-security-conference-attendees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/05/21/ibm-hands-out-virus-infected-usb-sticks-to-security-conference-attendees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bettiol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=50452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See also: This article&#8217;s headline. [Via Giz] Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/technology/security/ibm-distributes-virusladen-usb-keys-at-security-conference-20100521-w1gv.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-50453 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="irony" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/irony.png" alt="irony" width="630" height="244" /></a></center>
<p><strong>See also:</strong> This article&#8217;s headline.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5544593/ibm-gifts-computer-security-expo-attendees-with-virus+filled-usb-sticks">Giz</a>]<span id="more-50452"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/technology/security/ibm-distributes-virusladen-usb-keys-at-security-conference-20100521-w1gv.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/05/21/ibm-hands-out-virus-infected-usb-sticks-to-security-conference-attendees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/irony-80x80.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-10 14:10:34 -->
