<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; iPhone nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/iphone-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent suggests Apple may have planned &#8216;iPhone nano&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/18/patent-suggests-apple-may-have-planned-iphone-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/18/patent-suggests-apple-may-have-planned-iphone-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=108800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors of an iPhone nano are almost as old as the iPhone itself: the first such mumblings began in 2008. Now, Patently Apple suggests that Apple definitely was once, or still is, considering a smaller version of the iPhone. The patent in question shows a device with multiple inputs and hardware buttons or LED lights that would allow a user to interact with the phone. Given the touchscreen technology used in today&#8217;s iOS devices, we suspect this patent from 2006 would no longer reflect what an &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; might look like. In any case, it is arguable that Apple does not need to create an &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; now that it sells a $50 iPhone 4 and a free-on-contract iPhone 3GS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/18/patent-suggests-apple-may-have-planned-iphone-nano"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-108803" title="Screen shot 2011-10-18 at 2.53.16 PM" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-shot-2011-10-18-at-2.53.16-PM.png" alt="" width="647" height="419" /></a></center>
<p>Rumors of an iPhone nano are almost as old as the iPhone itself: the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/">first such mumblings began in 2008</a>. Now<em>, Patently Apple</em> suggests that Apple definitely was once, or still is, considering a smaller version of the iPhone. The patent in question shows a device with multiple inputs and hardware buttons or LED lights that would allow a user to interact with the phone. Given the touchscreen technology used in today&#8217;s iOS devices, we suspect this patent from 2006 would no longer reflect what an &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; might look like. In any case, it is arguable that Apple does not need to create an &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; now that it sells a $50 iPhone 4 and a free-on-contract iPhone 3GS. The patent was just one of 20 recently published patents that were granted to Apple. <span id="more-108800"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2011/10/apple-wins-a-key-patent-for-a-multi-touch-in-plane-switching-display.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/18/patent-suggests-apple-may-have-planned-iphone-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-shot-2011-10-18-at-2.53.16-PM-128x128.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nano a no-go; Times says no tiny iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/18/nano-a-no-go-times-says-no-tiny-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/18/nano-a-no-go-times-says-no-tiny-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheaper iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=77442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As sure as The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s sources were that Apple was cooking up a miniature iPhone for release in the near future is as sure The New York Times seems to be that the iPhone nano&#8217;s future isn&#8217;t very near. The Times says Apple is indeed pondering a cheaper iPhone model, but it won&#8217;t be any smaller in size. The report does not delve deeply into how Apple might make a less expensive iPhone model, though it does suggest Apple might opt for cheaper internal parts such as a lower-quality camera and smaller memory modules. Apple is currently focused on finishing its next-generation iPhone, however, which will launch this summer. The device will be approximately the same size as the iPhone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/technology/18apple.html?_r=2"><img class="size-full wp-image-76703 aligncenter" title="iPhone-nano-mockup-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iPhone-nano-mockup-2110214143703.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="481" /></a></center>
<p>As sure as <em>The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s</em> sources were that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/14/%e2%80%98iphone-nano%e2%80%99-rumors-resurface-now-accompanied-by-mockups/">Apple was cooking up a miniature iPhone</a> for release in the near future is as sure <em>The New York Times</em> seems to be that the iPhone nano&#8217;s future isn&#8217;t very near. <em>The Times</em> says Apple is indeed pondering a cheaper iPhone model, but it won&#8217;t be any smaller in size. The report does not delve deeply into how Apple might make a less expensive iPhone model, though it does suggest Apple might opt for cheaper internal parts such as a lower-quality camera and smaller memory modules. Apple is currently focused on finishing its next-generation iPhone, however, which will launch this summer. The device will be approximately the same size as the iPhone 4, the report states, and it may offer more robust voice controls. <em>The Times</em> also says Apple will soon expand its MobileMe services and make them free for iPhone users, which jibes with earlier reports.<span id="more-77442"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/technology/18apple.html?_r=2">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/18/nano-a-no-go-times-says-no-tiny-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iPhone-nano-mockup-2110214143703-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple to improve battery life by increasing cell density</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/apple-to-improve-battery-life-by-increasing-cell-density/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/apple-to-improve-battery-life-by-increasing-cell-density/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=77394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Apple patent uncovered on Thursday describes new technology Apple is experimenting with in an effort to increase the battery life in its device lines. The patent filing, entitled Increasing Energy Density in Rechargeable Lithium Battery Cells, describes a unique multi-pronged approach to the problem of poor battery life in consumer electronics. Apple is investigating the use of a new &#8220;multi-step constant-current constant-voltage (CC-CV) charging technique,&#8221; which would increase the volumetric and gravimetric energy density of energy-storing material within a battery. According to the filing, this would increase the capacity of a battery without impacting battery size or charge time. Relative to competitive products, Apple&#8217;s mobile device and laptop lines are often praised for exhibiting impressive battery life. There can never be enough time in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/02/17/apple_looking_to_increase_battery_life_with_dense_lithium_battery_cells.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-77395 aligncenter" title="iphone-4-back-open-battery" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iphone-4-back-open-battery110217191606.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="371" /></a></center>
<p>An Apple patent uncovered on Thursday describes new technology Apple is experimenting with in an effort to increase the battery life in its device lines. The patent filing, entitled <em>Increasing Energy Density in Rechargeable Lithium Battery Cells</em>, describes a unique multi-pronged approach to the problem of poor battery life in consumer electronics. Apple is investigating the use of a new &#8220;multi-step constant-current constant-voltage (CC-CV) charging technique,&#8221; which would increase the volumetric and gravimetric energy density of energy-storing material within a battery. According to the filing, this would increase the capacity of a battery without impacting battery size or charge time. Relative to competitive products, Apple&#8217;s mobile device and laptop lines are often praised for exhibiting impressive battery life. There can never be enough time in between charges, however, and as more features and better displays are added to future devices, manufacturers will always struggle to ensure battery life is not overly degraded as a result.<span id="more-77394"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/02/17/apple_looking_to_increase_battery_life_with_dense_lithium_battery_cells.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/apple-to-improve-battery-life-by-increasing-cell-density/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iphone-4-back-open-battery110217191606-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘iPhone nano’ could increase Apple’s smartphone revenue by 250%, analyst claims</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/iphone-nano-could-increase-apples-smartphone-revenue-by-250-analyst-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/iphone-nano-could-increase-apples-smartphone-revenue-by-250-analyst-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=77242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent resurgence of &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; rumors has Wall Street analysts working overtime. They already love Apple, which has basically been printing money lately, and rumors of Cupertino cooking up a smaller, cheaper iPhone could certainly send Apple&#8217;s mobile profits even further skyward. In fact, one analyst thinks a cheap version of Apple&#8217;s iOS-powered smartphone could expand its addressable market by a whopping 600%, therefore potentially giving iPhone profits a 250% boost. Bernstein Research analyst Toni Sacconaghi thinks Apple needs either needs a cheaper iPhone or more carrier agreements in order to increase its smartphone market share — a notion that borders on the obvious. The former option, a cheaper iPhone, could be achieved by building a smaller phone with a smaller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/ericsavitz/2011/02/15/apple-cheaper-iphone-could-expand-addressable-market-by-6x/"><img class="size-full wp-image-76703 aligncenter" title="iPhone-nano-mockup-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iPhone-nano-mockup-2110214143703.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="481" /></a></center>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/14/%e2%80%98iphone-nano%e2%80%99-rumors-resurface-now-accompanied-by-mockups/">recent resurgence of &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; rumors</a> has Wall Street analysts working overtime. They already love Apple, which has basically been printing money lately, and rumors of Cupertino cooking up a smaller, cheaper iPhone could certainly send Apple&#8217;s mobile profits even further skyward. In fact, one analyst thinks a cheap version of Apple&#8217;s iOS-powered smartphone could expand its addressable market by a whopping 600%, therefore potentially giving iPhone profits a 250% boost. Bernstein Research analyst Toni Sacconaghi thinks Apple needs either needs a cheaper iPhone or more carrier agreements in order to increase its smartphone market share — a notion that borders on the obvious. The former option, a cheaper iPhone, could be achieved by building a smaller phone with a smaller display panel. But Sacconaghi loses us entirely when he pitches another possibility that Apple might address new customers by offering an iPhone that doesn&#8217;t require a data plan. Apple has more muscle than any other cell phone maker right now, no doubt, but carriers would never sell an iPhone that didn&#8217;t help them reel in the dough on precious data plans.<span id="more-77242"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/ericsavitz/2011/02/15/apple-cheaper-iphone-could-expand-addressable-market-by-6x/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/17/iphone-nano-could-increase-apples-smartphone-revenue-by-250-analyst-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iphone-nano-mockup110216151714-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple to become Samsung’s No. 1 customer with $7.8 billion in parts purchases this year</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/14/apple-to-become-samsungs-no-1-customer-with-7-8-billion-in-parts-purchases-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/14/apple-to-become-samsungs-no-1-customer-with-7-8-billion-in-parts-purchases-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=76761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an unconfirmed report originating in the Korea Economic Daily newspaper, Apple will become Samsung&#8217;s largest customer in 2011. Citing anonymous industry sources, the report states that Apple is poised to spend $7.8 billion on parts from Samsung, which is one of the largest component suppliers in the world. Apple is known to have parts contracts in place with Samsung, but this staggering sum would make the Cupertino-based company Samsung&#8217;s single largest customer this year. The report states that liquid crystal displays, mobile application processors and NAND flash memory chips are among the parts Samsung has been contracted to supply for Apple. Apple and Samsung are also rivals in the mobile space, of course, with Apple&#8217;s iPhone and iPad competing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.hankyung.com/"><img class="size-full wp-image-54138 aligncenter" title="iFixit iPhone 4 teardown" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/kUEKB6Y2Ah5OIfAh.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="489" /></a></center>
<p>According to an unconfirmed report originating in the <em>Korea Economic Daily</em> newspaper, Apple will become Samsung&#8217;s largest customer in 2011. Citing anonymous industry sources, the report states that Apple is poised to spend $7.8 billion on parts from Samsung, which is one of the largest component suppliers in the world. Apple is known to have parts contracts in place with Samsung, but this staggering sum would make the Cupertino-based company Samsung&#8217;s single largest customer this year. The report states that liquid crystal displays, mobile application processors and NAND flash memory chips are among the parts Samsung has been contracted to supply for Apple. Apple and Samsung are also rivals in the mobile space, of course, with Apple&#8217;s iPhone and iPad competing directly with Samsung&#8217;s mobile phone and tablet lines.<span id="more-76761"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-to-buy-78-billion-in-samsung-parts-report-2011-02-13">MarketWatch</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hankyung.com/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/02/14/apple-to-become-samsungs-no-1-customer-with-7-8-billion-in-parts-purchases-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/kUEKB6Y2Ah5OIfAh-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible iPhone nano design and details revealed by Apple patent</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2009/07/29/possible-iphone-nano-design-and-details-revealed-by-apple-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2009/07/29/possible-iphone-nano-design-and-details-revealed-by-apple-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=31250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok people, you know the drill. Standard disclaimer here: patents may give us some preliminary details about a future product but companies &#8212; especially Apple &#8212; will patent anything and everything so don&#8217;t be too surprised if much of this patent never materializes. The biggest takeaway is likely the simple fact that Apple is indeed working on an iPhone nano in some capacity, as we&#8217;ve expected for quite a while now. That said, a reported patent unearthed this morning may shed some light on Apple&#8217;s preliminary designs where the elusive iPhone nano is concerned. According to the details revealed in the patent, Apple may in fact be considering a device that puts a new spin on touch interfaces by moving]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2009/07/29/possible-iphone-nano-design-and-details-revealed-by-apple-patent/"><img class="size-full wp-image-31246 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="29-patent-5" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-5.gif" alt="" width="500" height="313" /></a></center>
<p>Ok people, you know the drill. Standard disclaimer here: patents may give us some preliminary details about a future product but companies &#8212; especially Apple &#8212; will patent anything and everything so don&#8217;t be too surprised if much of this patent never materializes. The biggest takeaway is likely the simple fact that Apple is indeed working on an iPhone nano in some capacity, as we&#8217;ve expected for quite a while now. That said, a reported patent unearthed this morning may shed some light on Apple&#8217;s preliminary designs where the elusive iPhone nano is concerned. According to the details revealed in the patent, Apple may in fact be considering a device that puts a new spin on touch interfaces by moving the touch surface to the back of the device. The front of the handset would be comprised entirely of a display and the back would be a &#8220;force-sensitive touch based surface&#8221;. Sounds&#8230; Interesting. The concept of controls on the rear of a device is nothing new but it has yet to reach the market in any significant way because, well, it&#8217;s counter-intuitive. Unless this design manifests itself with a front-facing touchscreen as well (for typing, etc) the safe bet is on this iteration of the iPhone nano never leaving Apple&#8217;s lab. Hit the jump for more images.</p>
<p>Thanks, Jerome!</p>
<p><span id="more-31250"></span></p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-31249 aligncenter" title="29-patent-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-2.gif" alt="" width="500" height="305" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-31248 aligncenter" title="29-patent-3" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-3.gif" alt="" width="500" height="274" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-31247 aligncenter" title="29-patent-4" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-4.gif" alt="" width="500" height="284" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-31245 aligncenter" title="29-patent-6" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-6.gif" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-31244 aligncenter" title="29-patent-7" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-7.gif" alt="" width="500" height="263" /></center>
<p>[Via <a href="http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/07/29/apple-files-patent-for-the-iphone-nano/">MobileSyrup</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macnn.com/blogs/2009/07/29/stunning-nano-phone-surfaces-in-patent.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2009/07/29/possible-iphone-nano-design-and-details-revealed-by-apple-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/29-patent-7-80x80.gif</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple debunks iPhone nano rumor, disses netbooks and defends its technology</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/22/apple-debunks-iphone-nano-rumor-disses-netbooks-and-defends-its-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/22/apple-debunks-iphone-nano-rumor-disses-netbooks-and-defends-its-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Hodgkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=15023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amongst all the financial details being discussed during Apple&#8217;s first quarter 2009 earnings conference call, acting CEO Tim Cook fielded questions on iPhone pricing, the netbook market and Apple&#8217;s ability to sustain its leadership in a crowded mobile phone market. First and foremost, Cook dismissed the idea of a low cost iPhone nano by stating, &#8220;You know us, we&#8217;re not going to play in the low-end voice phone business. That&#8217;s not who we are. That&#8217;s not why we&#8217;re here. We&#8217;ll let somebody do that, our goal is not to be the unit share leader in the phone industry. It is to build the best phone.&#8221; So it looks like those iPhone nano rumors could be just that, rumors &#8211; though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/21results.html"><img class="size-medium wp-image-13231 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="apple-logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/apple-logo-256x300.jpg" alt="Apple" width="256" height="300" /></a></center>
<p>Amongst all the financial details being discussed during Apple&#8217;s first quarter 2009 earnings conference call, acting CEO Tim Cook fielded questions on iPhone pricing, the netbook market and Apple&#8217;s ability to sustain its leadership in a crowded mobile phone market. First and foremost, Cook dismissed the idea of a low cost iPhone nano by stating,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You know us, we&#8217;re not going to play in the low-end voice phone business. That&#8217;s not who we are. That&#8217;s not why we&#8217;re here. We&#8217;ll let somebody do that, our goal is not to be the unit share leader in the phone industry. It is to build the best phone.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So it looks like those iPhone nano rumors could be just that, rumors &#8211; though some of his comments were certainly open to interpretation. Cook was also questioned about the future possibility of a Mac netbook. When asked about the sub-$500 netbook market, Cook responded,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re watching that space, but right now from our point of view, the products in there are principally based on hardware that&#8217;s much less powerful than we think customers want, software technology that is not good, cramped keyboards, small displays. We don&#8217;t think people will be pleased with those products. It&#8217;s a category we watch, we&#8217;ve got some ideas here, but right now we think the products are inferior and will not provide an experience to customers they&#8217;re happy with.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Those are some scathing comments about netbooks so we can apparently assume that a Mac netbook is definitely not in the works. Last but not least, Cook was asked about Apple&#8217;s ability to remain the market leader with the iPhone in light of increased competition from Android, Windows Mobile and the Palm Pre. Hit the jump to see what Apple has to say about its competition.</p>
<p><span id="more-15023"></span>Cook reaffirmed Apple&#8217;s leadership in the mobile phone market and confirmed that Apple is &#8220;very, very confident with where we are competitively&#8221;. When asked directly about the Palm Pre which utilizes a multi-touch interface similar to the iPhone, Cook refused to single out an individual company but staunchly defended Apple&#8217;s technology by issuing threatening words to its competitors:</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="intellitxt">I&#8217;m just making a general statement that we think competition is good; it makes it us all better. And we&#8217;re ready to suit up and go against anyone. However, we will not stand for having our IP ripped off and we&#8217;ll use whatever weapons we have at our disposal. I don&#8217;t know that I can be more clear than that.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Those are fighting words from Apple and with the Palm Pre gaining momentum, one can only wonder if Palm may be a future target for Apple&#8217;s lawyers. In the end, it was a hell of an earnings call. If you happen to be interested at all in Apple&#8217;s Q1 FY09 results, which came in well above speculation, hit the read link.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/21results.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2009/01/22/apple-debunks-iphone-nano-rumor-disses-netbooks-and-defends-its-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The plot thickens: reputable case manufacturer adds iPhone nano to site</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/30/the-plot-thickens-reputable-case-manufacturer-adds-iphone-nano-to-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/30/the-plot-thickens-reputable-case-manufacturer-adds-iphone-nano-to-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=12867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaja, a reputable case manufacturer known for high quality leather cases, has added an entry for the iPhone nano to its site. A round of rumors that started months ago and resurfaced recently when XSKN added iPhone nano cases to its site, several case manufacturers now have entries for the new shrunken Apple handset that doesn&#8217;t yet exist. A listing from XSKN is one thing but when a company like Vaja adds the iPhone nano to its site, you have to wonder if the handset&#8217;s release isn&#8217;t closer than we might think. iPhone fan blog iPhone Alley now states that an inside source is feeding them info pointing to an announcement at Macworld. While we&#8217;re skeptical at best with regards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.vajacases.com/home/home_en.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-12868 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="170049-vaja" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/170049-vaja.jpg" alt="" width="374" height="267" /></a></center>
<p>Vaja, a reputable case manufacturer known for high quality leather cases, has added an entry for the iPhone nano to its site. A round of rumors that started months ago and resurfaced recently when <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/">XSKN added iPhone nano cases to its site</a>, several case manufacturers now have entries for the new shrunken Apple handset that doesn&#8217;t yet exist. A listing from XSKN is one thing but when a company like Vaja adds the iPhone nano to its site, you have to wonder if the handset&#8217;s release isn&#8217;t closer than we might think. iPhone fan blog iPhone Alley now states that an inside source is feeding them info pointing to an announcement at Macworld. While we&#8217;re skeptical at best with regards to this report &#8211; the blog states that its source reports the iPhone nano will &#8220;probably not include 3G&#8221; &#8211; a Macworld announcement is seeming more and more like a viable possibility. With the show only a week away at this point, at least we won&#8217;t have long to wait.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.iphonealley.com/news/iphone-nano-at-macworld-confirmed-by-vaja">iPhone Alley</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vajacases.com/home/home_en.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/30/the-plot-thickens-reputable-case-manufacturer-adds-iphone-nano-to-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/170049-vaja-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>XSKN makes no apologies, offers iPhone nano case for sale</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/23/xskn-makes-no-apologies-offers-iphone-nano-case-for-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/23/xskn-makes-no-apologies-offers-iphone-nano-case-for-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=12473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for I&#8217;m sorry. It looks like XSKN is making no apologies for putting up iPhone nano case entries on its site as we discovered recently. Instead, the rogue retailer is now offering cases for sale. XSKN&#8217;s site is now littered with images of its iPhone nano case in a variety of color combinations and each is available for sale. Yup, $25 &#8211; $27 plus shipping will land you one of these cute new cases for a handset that many speculate will never exist. Sure, this is hardly solid evidence that we&#8217;re going to see the iPhone nano emerge any time soon and it is entirely possible that XSKN is allergic to repeat business and is just hoping to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://xskn.com/default.aspx?m=Products&amp;sid=294&amp;cid=1"><img class="size-full wp-image-12474 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="nanomock" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/nanomock.png" alt="" width="482" height="233" /></a></center>
<p>So much for <em>I&#8217;m sorry</em>. It looks like XSKN is making no apologies for putting up <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/">iPhone nano</a> case entries on its site as we discovered recently. Instead, the rogue retailer is now offering cases for sale. XSKN&#8217;s site is now littered with images of its iPhone nano case in a variety of color combinations and each is available for sale. Yup, $25 &#8211; $27 plus shipping will land you one of these cute new cases for a handset that many speculate will never exist. Sure, this is hardly solid evidence that we&#8217;re going to see the iPhone nano emerge any time soon and it is entirely possible that XSKN is allergic to repeat business and is just hoping to scam a handful of users out of a few pennies. On the flip side of the coin however, we might just be looking at a pretty good representation of a new Apple handset coming in the not-so-distant future. We&#8217;ve said it before and we&#8217;ll say it again &#8211; the question isn&#8217;t <em>if</em> Apple will hit the $100 price mark with a future handset, the question is <em>when</em>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Jon!</p>
<p><a href="http://xskn.com/default.aspx?m=Products&amp;sid=294&amp;cid=1">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/23/xskn-makes-no-apologies-offers-iphone-nano-case-for-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/nanomock-150x150.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case manufacturers at it again; iPhone nano in the works?</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=12291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as everyone&#8217;s knee jerk reaction is to discount info like this, a brief pass over recent history tells us we probably shouldn&#8217;t be too quick to discount case manufacturers when it comes to leaking products. The iPhone 3G, second generation iPod Touch and even the current iPod nano model each had its form spied ahead of schedule as a result of leaks from case manufacturers &#8211; and now it might be the iPhone nano&#8217;s turn. This time around we&#8217;re not seeing any new imagery or mock-ups as we have in the past (though another manufacturer did leak an iPhone nano case mock-up earlier this year), but the simple &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; entry on XSKN&#8217;s website could prove to be]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://xskn.com/default.aspx?m=Styles&amp;cid=2099"><img class="size-full wp-image-12292 aligncenter" style="margin: 4px;" title="072405-iphonenano" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/072405-iphonenano.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="265" /></a></center>
<p>As much as everyone&#8217;s knee jerk reaction is to discount info like this, a brief pass over recent history tells us we probably shouldn&#8217;t be too quick to discount case manufacturers when it comes to leaking products. The iPhone 3G, second generation iPod Touch and even the current iPod nano model each had its form spied ahead of schedule as a result of leaks from case manufacturers &#8211; and now it might be the iPhone nano&#8217;s turn. This time around we&#8217;re not seeing any new imagery or mock-ups as we have in the past (though another manufacturer did leak an iPhone nano case mock-up earlier this year), but the simple &#8220;iPhone nano&#8221; entry on XSKN&#8217;s website could prove to be very telling. It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist or even an analyst to tell you that Apple will eventually be issuing a handset on the cheap to corner yet another market segment, but it looks like that could happen sooner rather than later. No, don&#8217;t expect it to happen at Macworld as you can be sure Stevo will be there to soak up the attention. At the same time, Apple has the goods when it comes to marketing, positioning and taking advantage of just about any situation. As the economy continues to hamper consumer spending, don&#8217;t surprised if we see Cupertino hit the competition where it hurts and enter the $100 and maybe even sub-$100 price ranges during the coming year.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/22/more-hints-of-an-iphone-nano-from-case-manufacturers/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://xskn.com/default.aspx?m=Styles&amp;cid=2099">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/12/22/case-manufacturers-at-it-again-iphone-nano-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/072405-iphonenano-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-11 22:36:42 -->
