<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DVDs and Blu-rays to carry two unskippable government warnings</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/11/dvd-blu-ray-government-piracy-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/11/dvd-blu-ray-government-piracy-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=139069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI Anti-Piracy Warning that is found on all modern DVD and Blu-ray discs is getting an upgrade. The United States government earlier this week announced that it will require two copyright notices on DVD and Blu-ray discs, Ars Technica reported. The first notice will warn potential piracy thieves, while the second one is meant to educate viewers. All six major movie studios have agreed to include the notices, which we will begin seeing on new discs this week. The screens will &#8220;come up after the previews, once you hit the main movie/play button on the DVD.&#8221; The warnings will each last 10 seconds and users will not have the ability to skip or fast forward through them. &#8220;Law enforcement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/11/dvd-blu-ray-government-piracy-warning"><img class="size-large wp-image-139080 aligncenter" title="DVDs" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DVDs-645x428.jpg" alt="DVDs And Blu-rays Now Carry Two Unskippable Government Warnings" width="645" height="428" /></a></center>
<p>The FBI Anti-Piracy Warning that is found on all modern <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/DVD">DVD</a> and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/blu-ray">Blu-ray</a> discs is getting an upgrade. The United States government earlier this week announced that it will require two copyright notices on DVD and Blu-ray discs, <em>Ars Technica</em> reported. The first notice will warn potential piracy thieves, while the second one is meant to educate viewers. All six major movie studios have agreed to include the notices, which we will begin seeing on new discs this week. The screens will &#8220;come up after the previews, once you hit the main movie/play button on the DVD.&#8221; The warnings will each last 10 seconds and users will not have the ability to skip or fast forward through them. &#8220;Law enforcement must continue to expand how it combats criminal activity; public awareness and education are a critical part of that effort,&#8221; ICE Director John Morton said in a statement. <span id="more-139069"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/dvds-and-blu-rays-will-now-carry-two-unskippable-government-warnings/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/11/dvd-blu-ray-government-piracy-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DVDs-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DVDs-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real-life &#8216;Avengers&#8217; would cost New York $160 billion in damages [video]</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/10/avengers-movie-real-life-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/10/avengers-movie-real-life-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=138911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Fury and &#8220;The Avengers&#8221; save the world from imminent doom in Paramount Pictures&#8217; movie of the same name, but in real life, the star-studded team of superheroes would cost New York City a fortune in the process. Based on a Marvel comic, &#8220;The Avengers&#8221; opened on May 4th and set a new record for opening weekend box office sales. The $200.3 million grossed by the film in fewer than three days wouldn&#8217;t even put a dent in the bill this team of superheroes would ring up if they took their battle to the streets of New York in real life, however. According to an analysis performed by the Kinetic Analysis Corporation, a firm that assesses damages for insurance companies,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/10/avengers-movie-real-life-damages"><img class="size-full wp-image-138912 aligncenter" title="The Avengers" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/the-avengers.jpg" alt="The Avengers Crush New York" width="652" height="408" /></a></center>
<p>Nick Fury and &#8220;The Avengers&#8221; save the world from imminent doom in Paramount Pictures&#8217; movie of the same name, but in real life, the star-studded team of superheroes would cost New York City a fortune in the process. Based on a Marvel comic, &#8220;The Avengers&#8221; opened on May 4th and set a new record for opening weekend box office sales. The $200.3 million grossed by the film in fewer than three days wouldn&#8217;t even put a dent in the bill this team of superheroes would ring up if they took their battle to the streets of New York in real life, however.<span id="more-138911"></span></p>
<p>According to an analysis performed by the Kinetic Analysis Corporation, a firm that assesses damages for insurance companies, the various battles fought by The Avengers in New York City resulted in as much as $70 billion worth of physical damage.The economic impact and costs associated with cleaning up the mess would add another $90 billion in expenses, bringing the total cost of the melee for insurance companies, businesses and the City of New York to $160 billion. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/video/92336843/"><em>Bloomberg&#8217;s</em> report</a> on the study follows below.</p>
<p><em>Updated to correct company name to Kinetic Analysis Corporation.</em></p>
<center><script src="http://player.ooyala.com/player.js?embedCode=Vudm5uNDqWAF2kgiuP4Er05S7ufnueAu&#038;playerBrandingId=8a7a9c84ac2f4e8398ebe50c07eb2f9d&#038;width=652&#038;deepLinkEmbedCode=Vudm5uNDqWAF2kgiuP4Er05S7ufnueAu&#038;height=367&#038;thruParam_bloomberg-ui[popOutButtonVisible]=FALSE"></script></center>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/05/10/avengers-movie-real-life-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/the-avengers-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/the-avengers-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple in talks to stream EPIX films to Apple TV</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/28/apple-in-talks-to-stream-epix-films-to-apple-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/28/apple-in-talks-to-stream-epix-films-to-apple-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lionsgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paramount Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=137340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is reportedly in talks to stream films owned by EPIX — a joint venture among Paramount Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Lionsgate — across a variety of devices, including the long-anticipated iTV, according to a report from Reuters. Two people with knowledge of the negotiations told the publication that the talks are in the preliminary stages and no agreement is considered near. The Cupertino-based company is reportedly looking to beef up the content offered through its Apple TV set-top box and upcoming devices. An agreement could prove troublesome, however, due to EPIX’s $200 million agreement with Netflix, which gave the company exclusive streaming rights through September. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epix-homepage.jpg" id="blogsy-1335621079028.7358" class="size-full wp-image-137343 aligncenter" alt="Apple TV to stream EPIX movies" width="600" height="400"><a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/apple">Apple</a> is reportedly in talks to stream films owned by EPIX — a joint venture among Paramount Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Lionsgate — across a variety of devices, including <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/itv/">the long-anticipated iTV</a>, according to a report from <em>Reuters</em>. Two people with knowledge of the negotiations told the publication that the talks are in the preliminary stages and no agreement is considered near. The Cupertino-based company is reportedly looking to beef up the content offered through its Apple TV set-top box and upcoming devices. An agreement could prove troublesome, however, due to EPIX’s $200 million agreement with Netflix, which gave the company exclusive streaming rights through September.<span id="more-137340"></span>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/27/us-apple-epix-idUSBRE83Q18720120427">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/28/apple-in-talks-to-stream-epix-films-to-apple-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epix-homepage-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epix-homepage-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New deal brings 600 MGM movies to Android and YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/new-deal-brings-600-mgm-movies-to-android-and-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/new-deal-brings-600-mgm-movies-to-android-and-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Google have come to an agreement to offer 600 movies for rent through YouTube and the Google Play marketplace for users in the U.S. and Canada. &#8220;Thanks to MGM, you’ll be able to join in this trend and grab its movies online and on the go,&#8221; the company said in a blog post on Monday. &#8220;From timeless love stories like West Side Story and Moonstruck, to sci-fi action films like The Terminator and Robocop, to modern classics like Rain Man and Rocky, you can now rediscover MGM’s movie-making magic on Google Play and YouTube.&#8221; The Mountain View-based company has rental deals in place with five other major Hollywood studios, including Paramount, Warner Brothers, Disney, Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures. NewsCorp&#8217;s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/new-deal-brings-600-mgm-movies-to-android-and-youtube"><img class="size-large wp-image-135869 aligncenter" title="MGM" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MGM-645x483.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="483" /></a></center>
<p>Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Google have come to an agreement to offer 600 movies for rent through YouTube and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/06/google-announces-google-play-to-replace-android-market-video/">the Google Play marketplace</a> for users in the U.S. and Canada. &#8220;Thanks to MGM, you’ll be able to join in this trend and grab its movies online and on the go,&#8221; the company said in a blog post on Monday. &#8220;From timeless love stories like West Side Story and Moonstruck, to sci-fi action films like The Terminator and Robocop, to modern classics like Rain Man and Rocky, you can now rediscover MGM’s movie-making magic on Google Play and YouTube.&#8221; The Mountain View-based company has rental deals in place with five other major Hollywood studios, including <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/google-and-paramount-strike-a-deal-500-movies-coming-soon-to-youtube-google-play/">Paramount</a>, Warner Brothers, Disney, Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures. NewsCorp&#8217;s 20th Century Fox remains as one of the few studios that has not yet reached an agreement with the Internet giant. <span id="more-135860"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2012/04/mgm-titles-roar-onto-youtube-and-google.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/16/new-deal-brings-600-mgm-movies-to-android-and-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MGM-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MGM-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon said to be inflating streaming library size [updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/amazon-netflix-said-to-be-inflating-streaming-library-sizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/amazon-netflix-said-to-be-inflating-streaming-library-sizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online retail giant Amazon is said to be stretching the truth regarding the size of its streaming content library when reporting numbers to the public. According to a report from Fast Company, the &#8220;17,000 movies and television shows&#8221; Amazon claims to offer Amazon Prime customers is inflated by roughly 10 times. Amazon Prime members have free, unlimited access to Amazon&#8217;s streaming content catalog, which can be viewed using a number of devices including a Roku set-top box and Amazon&#8217;s Kindle Fire tablet. Rather than counting a TV series toward the total content tally Amazon claims its users have access to, Amazon counts each individual episode of a TV show toward that 17,000-title total. So, for example, Fox&#8217;s &#8220;24&#8243; counts not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/amazon-netflix-said-to-be-inflating-streaming-library-sizes"><img class="size-full wp-image-127540 aligncenter" title="amazon-sign" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/amazon-sign.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Online retail giant Amazon is said to be stretching the truth regarding the size of its streaming content library when reporting numbers to the public. According to a report from <em>Fast Company</em>, the &#8220;17,000 movies and television shows&#8221; Amazon claims to offer <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/amazon-prime/">Amazon Prime</a> customers is inflated by roughly 10 times. Amazon Prime members have free, unlimited access to Amazon&#8217;s streaming content catalog, which can be viewed using a number of devices including a Roku set-top box and Amazon&#8217;s Kindle Fire tablet. Rather than counting a TV series toward the total content tally Amazon claims its users have access to, Amazon counts each individual episode of a TV show toward that 17,000-title total. So, for example, Fox&#8217;s &#8220;24&#8243; counts not once but 192 times, and various versions of the &#8220;Power Rangers&#8221; show add 715 <em>shows</em> to Amazon&#8217;s catalog. The actual size of Amazon&#8217;s library? 1,745 movies and 150 television series. Netflix, which has been said to have a catalog of 60,000 streaming titles, actually has approximately 13,000 different titles including 9,500 movies and 3,500 TV series, the report claims.</p>
<p><span id="more-135588"></span></p>
<p><em>Updated to clarify that Netflix does not publish the number of titles available in its streaming catalog.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1830524/the-juiced-misleading-sizes-of-netflix-and-amazon-streaming-libraries">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/amazon-netflix-said-to-be-inflating-streaming-library-sizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/amazon-sign-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/amazon-sign-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix paid $1 million for a recommendation algorithm it never used</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/netflix-paid-1-million-for-a-recommendation-algorithm-it-never-used/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/netflix-paid-1-million-for-a-recommendation-algorithm-it-never-used/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=135623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix in 2006 held an open competition to find the collaborative filtering algorithm that would best predict whether or not a user would like a particular film or TV show based on previous ratings. The grand prize of $1 million was awarded to a team called &#8220;BellKor&#8217;s Pragmatic Chaos&#8221; in 2009. The team&#8217;s algorithm was found to be 10% more effect than Netflix&#8217;s own recommendation service, however the company never implemented the team&#8217;s solution into its own service. &#8220;We evaluated some of the new methods offline but the additional accuracy gains that we measured did not seem to justify the engineering effort needed to bring them into a production environment,&#8221; Netflix finally explained in a recent blog post. &#8220;Also, our]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/netflix-paid-1-million-for-a-recommendation-algorithm-it-never-used"><img class="size-full wp-image-135631 aligncenter" title="Netflix Prize" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Netflix-Prize.jpg" alt="" width="594" height="390" /></a></center>
<p>Netflix in 2006 held an open competition to find the collaborative filtering algorithm that would best predict whether or not a user would like a particular film or TV show based on previous ratings. The grand prize of $1 million was awarded to a team called &#8220;BellKor&#8217;s Pragmatic Chaos&#8221; in 2009. The team&#8217;s algorithm was found to be 10% more effect than Netflix&#8217;s own recommendation service, however the company never implemented the team&#8217;s solution into its own service. &#8220;We evaluated some of the new methods offline but the additional accuracy gains that we measured did not seem to justify the engineering effort needed to bring them into a production environment,&#8221; Netflix finally explained in a recent blog post. &#8220;Also, our focus on improving Netflix personalization had shifted to the next level by then.&#8221; The company said because the majority its users were streaming videos rather than renting DVDs, it wasn&#8217;t logical to integrate the algorithm into its recommendation service, which is different for its streaming service and DVD rental program. <span id="more-135623"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/04/netflix-recommendations-beyond-5-stars.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/13/netflix-paid-1-million-for-a-recommendation-algorithm-it-never-used/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Netflix-Prize-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Netflix-Prize-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Paramount strike a deal: 500 movies coming soon to YouTube, Google Play</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/google-and-paramount-strike-a-deal-500-movies-coming-soon-to-youtube-google-play/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/google-and-paramount-strike-a-deal-500-movies-coming-soon-to-youtube-google-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie rentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paramount Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=134453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google on Wednesday announced a new deal with Paramount Pictures that will allow more than 500 movie titles to be rented through YouTube and the Google Play marketplace. The Mountain View-based company now has rental deals with five of the six major Hollywood studios — including Paramount, Warner Brothers, Disney, Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures — and 20th Century Fox is the only studio that hasn&#8217;t yet reached an agreement with Google. &#8220;Celebrating its 100th anniversary this year, Paramount has been responsible for some of the most memorable films in cinema history,&#8221; said Malik Ducard, YouTube&#8217;s director of content partnerships. &#8220;With the addition of Paramount, we now have five of the six major studios and over ten independent movie studios]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/google-and-paramount-strike-a-deal-500-movies-coming-soon-to-youtube-google-play"><img class="size-large wp-image-134462 aligncenter" title="Paramount_logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Paramount_logo-645x268.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="268" /></a></center>
<p>Google on Wednesday announced a new deal with Paramount Pictures that will allow more than 500 movie titles to be rented through YouTube and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/06/google-announces-google-play-to-replace-android-market-video/">the Google Play marketplace</a>. The Mountain View-based company now has rental deals with five of the six major Hollywood studios — including Paramount, Warner Brothers, Disney, Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures — and 20th Century Fox is the only studio that hasn&#8217;t yet reached an agreement with Google. &#8220;Celebrating its 100th anniversary this year, Paramount has been responsible for some of the most memorable films in cinema history,&#8221; said Malik Ducard, YouTube&#8217;s director of content partnerships. &#8220;With the addition of Paramount, we now have five of the six major studios and over ten independent movie studios offering nearly 9,000 movies for rent to millions of people around the world. It&#8217;s still early days for us, and we&#8217;ll continue adding new titles and expanding our service to more countries this year.&#8221; The majority of the movies tied to this deal are available now, and the rest will be added to YouTube and Google Play over the next few months. <span id="more-134453"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/coming-soon-to-youtube-and-google-play.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/04/google-and-paramount-strike-a-deal-500-movies-coming-soon-to-youtube-google-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Paramount_logo-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Paramount_logo-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast deals blow to net neutrality, says own video service is exempt from bandwidth caps</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/29/comcast-deals-blow-to-net-neutrality-says-own-video-service-is-exempt-from-bandwidth-caps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/29/comcast-deals-blow-to-net-neutrality-says-own-video-service-is-exempt-from-bandwidth-caps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XFINITY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=133762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cable network operator and Internet service provider Comcast reportedly confirmed earlier this week that it would give its own video streaming service a huge advantage over rival services like Netflix. Showing blatant disregard for net neutrality principles, Comcast said this week that its video streaming service Xfinity will be exempt from the 250GB bandwidth cap it foists on subscribers, Raw Story reports. Movies and TV shows streamed using rival services such as Netflix and Hulu will still apply toward users&#8217; monthly bandwidth caps. Microsoft announced earlier this week that Comcast&#8217;s Xfinity service was launching on its popular Xbox 360 video game and home entertainment console, and heavy users on Comcast&#8217;s network now have a clear reason to choose Xfinity over]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/29/comcast-deals-blow-to-net-neutrality-says-own-video-service-is-exempt-from-bandwidth-caps"><img class="size-full wp-image-133764 aligncenter" title="globe-streaming-video-shutterstock_95796109" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/globe-streaming-video-shutterstock_95796109.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="456" /></a></center>
<p>Cable network operator and Internet service provider Comcast reportedly confirmed earlier this week that it would give its own video streaming service a huge advantage over rival services like Netflix. Showing blatant disregard for net neutrality principles, Comcast said this week that its video streaming service Xfinity will be exempt from the 250GB bandwidth cap it foists on subscribers, <em>Raw Story</em> reports. Movies and TV shows streamed using rival services such as Netflix and Hulu will still apply toward users&#8217; monthly bandwidth caps. Microsoft announced earlier this week that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/27/xbox-live-update-delivers-comcasts-vod-service-hbo-go-and-mlb-tv/">Comcast&#8217;s Xfinity service was launching on its popular Xbox 360 video game and home entertainment console</a>, and heavy users on Comcast&#8217;s network now have a clear reason to choose Xfinity over any of the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/05/microsoft-teams-up-with-new-content-companies-for-tv-on-xbox-360/">dozens of rival streaming services supported by the Xbox</a>.<span id="more-133762"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/28/comcast-exempts-its-new-streaming-video-service-from-bandwidth-caps/">Read</a></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?lang=en&amp;search_source=search_form&amp;version=llv1&amp;anyorall=all&amp;safesearch=1&amp;searchterm=streaming+video&amp;search_group=#id=95796109&amp;src=a2268c5a36d0aea8c49f77fd55477fb7-1-18">Creative media technologies</a> image via Shutterstock.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/29/comcast-deals-blow-to-net-neutrality-says-own-video-service-is-exempt-from-bandwidth-caps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/globe-streaming-video-shutterstock_95796109-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/globe-streaming-video-shutterstock_95796109-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>File-sharing site RapidShare deemed legal by court</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/28/file-sharing-site-rapidshare-deemed-legal-by-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/28/file-sharing-site-rapidshare-deemed-legal-by-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital locker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapidshare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=133530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RapidShare is widely known as an invaluable tool for the illegal sharing of copyrighted digital material. Much like Megaupload, which was shuttered earlier this year when company founder Kim Dotcom was arrested and charged with racketeering and violating anti-piracy laws, RapidShare allows users to upload any file and share a link with other users who may then download the content. While some users share files legally with RapidShare, millions more upload copyrighted movies, music and eBooks which are then downloaded illegally by others around the world who find links to the files on blogs or through special search engines. Following a preliminary ruling, a court in Germany has now declared RapidShare to be legal, but it must utilize a monitoring]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/28/file-sharing-site-rapidshare-deemed-legal-by-court"><img class="size-full wp-image-132116 aligncenter" title="Rapidshare" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="338" /></a></center>
<p>RapidShare is widely known as an invaluable tool for the illegal sharing of copyrighted digital material. Much like Megaupload, which was <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/megaupload-com-shut-down-founder-charged-with-violating-piracy-laws/">shuttered earlier this year</a> when company founder <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/megaupload-com-shut-down-founder-charged-with-violating-piracy-laws/">Kim Dotcom was arrested and charged with racketeering and violating anti-piracy laws</a>, RapidShare allows users to upload any file and share a link with other users who may then download the content. While some users share files legally with RapidShare, millions more upload copyrighted movies, music and eBooks which are then downloaded illegally by others around the world who find links to the files on blogs or through special search engines. Following a preliminary ruling, a court in Germany has now declared RapidShare to be legal, but it must utilize a monitoring mechanisms if it wishes to remain operational. Read on for more.<span id="more-133530"></span></p>
<p>In its fight against GEMA and German book publishers in Germany, RapidShare was ordered to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/16/court-orders-file-sharing-site-rapidshare-to-monitor-for-copyrighted-content/">implement a system that would monitor for copyrighted content uploaded to its servers</a>. Now, however, the court has amended its decision <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/rapidshare-declared-legal-in-court-with-a-twist-120327/">according to <em>TorrentFreak</em></a>. Rather than monitor files being uploaded to its servers and block copyrighted content — which may be stored legally if it is not shared — RapidShare must create a system to monitor in-bound links from other websites that may point to infringing material.</p>
<p>&#8220;For the first time the Hamburg Higher Regional Court has followed our line of argument on key points and has conferred legal legitimacy on our service, just as other courts have done over a considerable period of time. This is a significant result for us,&#8221; said RapidShare CEO Alexandra Zwingli. &#8221;That is exactly what RapidShare has already been doing for many years. If the Anti-Abuse Team identifies a download link on such pages which results in a file that has clearly been published illegally being on the company’s servers, the file in question is immediately blocked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because RapidShare is already taking the measure outlined by the court, it plans to appeal the new decision to Germany&#8217;s Supreme Court. &#8220;We are doing this of our own accord because we have a strong interest in ensuring that our service remains clean,&#8221; Zwingli <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/rapidshare-declared-legal-in-court-with-a-twist-120327/">told <em>TorrentFreak</em></a>. &#8221;We believe that being obliged to carry out such actions is questionable from a legal perspective. For this reason we will appeal the verdict to clarify the issue of proactive monitoring of external websites at the highest judicial level.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/28/file-sharing-site-rapidshare-deemed-legal-by-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online movie streaming in U.S. to top DVDs for the first time in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/26/online-movie-streaming-in-u-s-to-top-dvds-for-the-first-time-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/26/online-movie-streaming-in-u-s-to-top-dvds-for-the-first-time-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=133291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online movie streaming in the United States is expected to top both DVD and Blu-ray use for the first time ever in 2012, according to a study from IHS Screen Digest. The study suggests that in 2012, Americans will legally stream 3.4 billion movies online — twice the 1.4 billion streamed in 2011 — while DVD and Blu-ray movies watching this year will to 2.4 billion from 2.6 billion in 2011. Last year, the unlimited-streaming services offered by Netflix and Amazon Prime accounted for 94% of all paid online movie viewing in the U.S. Additionally, consumers paid an average of $0.51 for every movie streamed online, compared to $4.72 for DVD and Blu-ray discs. &#8220;We are looking at the beginning of the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/26/online-movie-streaming-in-u-s-to-top-dvds-for-the-first-time-in-2012"><img class="size-full wp-image-82569 aligncenter" title="netflix-streaming-samsung-blu-ray" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/netflix-streaming-samsung-blu-ray110324114714.jpeg" alt="" width="491" height="400" /></a></center>
<p>Online movie streaming in the United States is expected to top both DVD and Blu-ray use for the first time ever in 2012, according to a study from IHS Screen Digest. The study suggests that in 2012, Americans will legally stream 3.4 billion movies online — twice the 1.4 billion streamed in 2011 — while DVD and Blu-ray movies watching this year will to 2.4 billion from 2.6 billion in 2011. Last year, the unlimited-streaming services offered by <a href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/netflix/">Netflix</a> and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/amazon-announces-content-agreement-with-viacom-for-kindle-fire-prime-customers/">Amazon Prime</a> accounted for 94% of all paid online movie viewing in the U.S. Additionally, consumers paid an average of $0.51 for every movie streamed online, compared to $4.72 for DVD and Blu-ray discs. &#8220;We are looking at the beginning of the end of the age of movies on physical media like DVD and Blu-ray,&#8221; IHS analyst Dan Cryan said. &#8220;But the transition is likely to take time: almost nine years after the launch of the iTunes Store, CDs are still a vital part of the music business.&#8221; <span id="more-133291"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.screendigest.com/reports/2012222a/2012_03_online_movies_the_future_today/view.html">Bloomberg</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.screendigest.com/reports/2012222a/2012_03_online_movies_the_future_today/view.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/26/online-movie-streaming-in-u-s-to-top-dvds-for-the-first-time-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/netflix-streaming-samsung-blu-ray110324114714-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/netflix-streaming-samsung-blu-ray110324114714-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court orders file-sharing site RapidShare to monitor for copyrighted content [updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/16/court-orders-file-sharing-site-rapidshare-to-monitor-for-copyrighted-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/16/court-orders-file-sharing-site-rapidshare-to-monitor-for-copyrighted-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapidshare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=132114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court in Germany ruled on Thursday that RapidShare must implement a system that proactively filters user uploads in order to prevent the illegal sharing of copyrighted content. Like Megaupload, which was shuttered earlier this year, RapidShare allows users to upload large files and share them online. The service has become widely known for hosting copyrighted software, music, movies and books that are then shared illegally on forums, blogs and a variety of of other websites. Following verdicts in three separate cases filed by two book publishers and an group representing music publishers called GEMA, the firm has been ordered to take a more active role in preventing infringing content from being uploaded to its servers, TorrentFreak reported. RapidShare has not yet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/16/court-orders-file-sharing-site-rapidshare-to-monitor-for-copyrighted-content"><img class="size-full wp-image-132116 aligncenter" title="Rapidshare" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="338" /></a></center>
<p>A court in Germany ruled on Thursday that RapidShare must implement a system that proactively filters user uploads in order to prevent the illegal sharing of copyrighted content. Like Megaupload, which was <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/01/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-im-no-piracy-king/">shuttered earlier this year</a>, RapidShare allows users to upload large files and share them online. The service has become widely known for hosting copyrighted software, music, movies and books that are then shared illegally on forums, blogs and a variety of of other websites. Following verdicts in three separate cases filed by two book publishers and an group representing music publishers called GEMA, the firm has been ordered to take a more active role in preventing infringing content from being uploaded to its servers, <em>TorrentFreak</em> reported. RapidShare has not yet stated whether or not it will appeal the decision.</p>
<p>UPDATE: RapidShare has issued a press release in response to this ruled, which now follows below.<span id="more-132114"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Premature rejoicing at GEMA and the German Publishers and Booksellers Association</strong></p>
<p>Baar/Switzerland, 16 March 2012. On 14 March 2012, the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg affirmed injunctive relief sought by GEMA and the publishers Campus and De Gruyter against RapidShare in three separate judgments. Both the German Publishers and Booksellers Association and GEMA issued &#8220;jubilant statements&#8221; immediately afterwards. In doing so they are conveniently ignoring the fact that it is considered unprofessional to evaluate a judgment before the written reasons for the judgment are on hand. Only then will it become apparent which party can truly celebrate a judgment as a success.</p>
<p>However, the Higher Regional court of Hamburg has issued a press release indicating a possible reason for the plaintiffs&#8217; hectic actions: in the present cases the Court has amended its previous position, according to which RapidShare&#8217;s business model was not approved by the legal system. For the first time, the Court has also acknowledged that files only become &#8220;publicly accessible&#8221; when users publish the links in the Internet. In the past the previous diverging assessment had resulted in extensive obligations, already when uploading a file. Accordingly, the Court now sees the duties of RapidShare in particular in fighting the issue of piracy where illegal files are actually distributed, namely on the respective link pages. That is exactly what RapidShare has already been engaged in for years.</p>
<p>Alexandra Zwingli, CEO of RapidShare: &#8220;Of course, we will only make a detailed statement once we have the complete text. However, I am convinced that our tried-and-tested actions against copyright infringements are the right way to go, and I am pleased that the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg has confirmed as much in its press release. This demonstrates that we are not only technological, but also legal pioneers in cloud storage.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-orders-rapidshare-to-filter-user-uploads-120315/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/16/court-orders-file-sharing-site-rapidshare-to-monitor-for-copyrighted-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rapidshare-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. ISPs become &#8216;copyright cops&#8217; starting July 12th</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/15/u-s-isps-become-copyright-cops-starting-july-12th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/15/u-s-isps-become-copyright-cops-starting-july-12th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antipiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throttling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=131843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comcast, Cablevision, Verizon, Time Warner Cable and other Internet service providers in the United States will soon launch new programs to police their networks in an effort to catch digital pirates and stop illegal file-sharing. Major ISPs announced last summer that they had agreed to take new measures in an effort to prevent subscribers from illegally downloading copyrighted material, but the specifics surrounding the imminent antipiracy measures were not made available. Now, RIAA chief executive Cary Sherman has said that ISPs are ready to begin their efforts to curtail illegal movie, music and software downloads on July 12th. Read on for more. &#8220;Each ISP has to develop their infrastructure for automating the system,&#8221; Sherman said during a talk at the annual]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/15/u-s-isps-become-copyright-cops-starting-july-12th"><img class="size-full wp-image-131065 aligncenter" title="digital-pirate" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/digital-pirate.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="438" /></a></center>
<p>Comcast, Cablevision, Verizon, Time Warner Cable and other Internet service providers in the United States will soon launch new programs to police their networks in an effort to catch digital pirates and stop illegal file-sharing. Major ISPs announced last summer that they had agreed to take new measures in an effort to prevent subscribers from illegally downloading copyrighted material, but the specifics surrounding the imminent antipiracy measures were not made available. Now, RIAA chief executive Cary Sherman has said that ISPs are ready to begin their efforts to curtail illegal movie, music and software downloads on July 12th. Read on for more.<span id="more-131843"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Each ISP has to develop their infrastructure for automating the system,&#8221; Sherman said during a talk at the annual Association of American Publishers meeting, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57397452-261/riaa-chief-isps-to-start-policing-copyright-by-july-12/">according to <em>CNET</em></a>. Measures will also be taken to establish databases &#8220;so they can keep track of repeat infringers, so they know that this is the first notice or the third notice. Every ISP has to do it differently depending on the architecture of its particular network. Some are nearing completion and others are a little further from completion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Customers found to be illegally downloading copyrighted material will first receive one or two notifications from their ISPs, essentially stating that they have been caught. If the illegal downloads continue, subscribers will receive a new notice requesting acknowledgement that the notice has been received. Subsequent offenses can then result in bandwidth throttling and even service suspension.</p>
<p>The news comes shortly after the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/01/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-im-no-piracy-king/">closure of file-sharing giant Megaupload</a> and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile/">increased pressure on other networks</a> thought to be major hubs for the illegal distribution of copyrighted materials. Some studies show that these measures have had <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/megaupload-shutdown-did-nothing-to-slow-piracy-study-finds/">no impact on piracy</a>, however, so organizations like the RIAA have been lobbying for ISPs to intervene and develop systems that will allow them to police their networks and directly address subscribers who illegally download copyrighted content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/15/u-s-isps-become-copyright-cops-starting-july-12th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/digital-pirate-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/digital-pirate-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PirateBox offline file-sharing solution puts pirates out of authorities&#8217; reach [video]</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/piratebox-offline-file-sharing-solution-puts-pirates-out-of-authorities-reach-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/piratebox-offline-file-sharing-solution-puts-pirates-out-of-authorities-reach-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PirateBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=131281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent ordeal surrounding the now defeated SOPA and PIPA proposals followed by the shuttering of file-sharing giant Megaupload has put online piracy back in the spotlight. Despite studies showing Megaupload&#8217;s closure had no impact on online piracy whatsoever, copyright owners continue to pressure authorities in an effort to go after more services similar to Megaupload. The new wave of attention these file-sharing services are attracting is driving some illegal downloaders to seek out new means of sharing copyrighted materials, and decentralized torrent network Tribler emerged as one option. Another interesting solution created by a New York University professor takes things a step further, however, completely removing the Internet from the file-sharing equation and therefore putting pirates out of authorities&#8217;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/piratebox-offline-file-sharing-solution-puts-pirates-out-of-authorities-reach-video"><img class="size-full wp-image-131291 aligncenter" title="piratebox" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/piratebox.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="367" /></a></center>
<p>The recent ordeal surrounding <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/riaa-ceo-says-google-and-wikipedia-misinformed-the-public-about-sopa-pipa/">the now defeated SOPA and PIPA proposals</a> followed by <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/01/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-im-no-piracy-king/">the shuttering of file-sharing giant Megaupload</a> has put online piracy back in the spotlight. Despite studies showing <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/megaupload-shutdown-did-nothing-to-slow-piracy-study-finds/">Megaupload&#8217;s closure had no impact on online piracy whatsoever</a>, copyright owners continue to pressure authorities in an effort to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile/">go after more services similar to Megaupload</a>. The new wave of attention these file-sharing services are attracting is driving some illegal downloaders to seek out new means of sharing copyrighted materials, and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/unstoppable-file-sharing-network-tribler-spells-trouble-for-copyright-holders/">decentralized torrent network Tribler emerged as one option</a>. Another interesting solution created by a New York University professor takes things a step further, however, completely removing the Internet from the file-sharing equation and therefore putting pirates out of authorities&#8217; reach.<span id="more-131281"></span></p>
<p>NYU professor David Darts created the PirateBox more than a year ago and now, thanks to the availability of new cheaper components, users can build a box for as little as $50 <a href="https://torrentfreak.com/piratebox-takes-file-sharing-off-the-radar-and-offline-for-next-to-nothing-120311/">according to <em>TorrentFreak</em></a>. Once assembled, the PirateBox essentially acts as its own file-sharing network, broadcasting wirelessly and allowing any users within range to upload and download files.</p>
<p>&#8220;Simply turn the PirateBox on to transform any space into a temporary communication and wireless file sharing network,&#8221; <a href="http://wiki.daviddarts.com/PirateBox">Darts wrote on his wiki page</a>. &#8220;When users join the PirateBox wireless network and open a web browser, they are automatically redirected to the PirateBox welcome page. Users can then immediately begin chatting and/or uploading or downloading files.&#8221;</p>
<p>Darts has published a free DIY guide that allows anyone to gather the equipment needed and build a PirateBox quickly and easily, and all of the software used by the device is free and open source. &#8221;The PirateBox consists of a wireless router and light-weight Linux server connected to a USB hard drive,&#8221; Darts notes. &#8220;The system can run on AC or DC power which allows it to be fully mobile. You can take it to the park, operate it a cafe, in a subway, at work, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>The solution is designed with both privacy and security in mind. While PirateBox users must be in close quarters in order to access the device, it doesn&#8217;t require any logins nor does it log any user data. Users on the local network are kept completely anonymous and because there is no Internet connection, there is no way for authorities working with copyright owners to track the service.</p>
<center><object width="651" height="398" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XeIiFKnKPjE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="651" height="398" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XeIiFKnKPjE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></center>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/piratebox-offline-file-sharing-solution-puts-pirates-out-of-authorities-reach-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/piratebox-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/piratebox-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s upcoming streaming TV service again tipped by CBS CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/apples-upcoming-streaming-tv-service-again-tipped-by-cbs-ceo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/apples-upcoming-streaming-tv-service-again-tipped-by-cbs-ceo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Moonves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=131227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple CEO Steve Jobs approached CBS approximately one year ago in an attempt to secure a content deal for a streaming television service that was in development at the time. CBS chief executive Leslie Moonves publicly spoke of the negotiations once before during an earnings call late last year, and now he is quoted again after having reportedly discussed the matter on stage during a presentation at the UCLA Entertainment Symposium. &#8221;I told Steve, &#8216;You know more than me about 99 percent of things but I know more about the television business,&#8217; &#8221; Moonves said according to Hollywood Reporter. Moonves said he denied Jobs access to CBS content for the service out of fear it might disrupt CBS&#8217;s existing revenue streams.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/apples-upcoming-streaming-tv-service-again-tipped-by-cbs-ceo"><img class="size-full wp-image-95559 aligncenter" title="Apple-Store-Logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Apple-Store-Logo110704144151.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="433" /></a></center>
<p>Apple CEO Steve Jobs approached CBS approximately one year ago in an attempt to secure a content deal for a streaming television service that was in development at the time. CBS chief executive Leslie Moonves publicly spoke of the negotiations once before during an earnings call late last year, and now he is quoted again after having reportedly discussed the matter on stage during a presentation at the UCLA Entertainment Symposium. &#8221;I told Steve, &#8216;You know more than me about 99 percent of things but I know more about the television business,&#8217; &#8221; Moonves said according to <em>Hollywood Reporter</em>. Moonves said he denied Jobs access to CBS content for the service out of fear it might disrupt CBS&#8217;s existing revenue streams. Apple is reportedly still working on a unique streaming TV service that it intends to launch alongside <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/27/apple-will-absolutely-launch-a-tv-siri-to-replace-remote-according-to-report/">an Apple-branded HDTV</a> later this year. Some reports suggest the service <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/02/apple-to-launch-subscription-tv-service-by-christmas-content-talks-going-downhill/">may treat channels like apps</a>, allowing users to subscribe to individual channels or groups of channels a la carte.<span id="more-131227"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/leslie-moonves-steve-jobs-cbs-apple-tv-298300">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/12/apples-upcoming-streaming-tv-service-again-tipped-by-cbs-ceo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Apple-Store-Logo110704144151-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Apple-Store-Logo110704144151-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Megaupload down for the count, MPAA sets sights on Hotfile</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotfile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=131069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Motion Picture Association of America this week filed a motion for a summary judgement against file-sharing service Hotfile in a U.S. District Court in Florida, TorrentFreak reports. The MPAA, which describes itself as &#8221;the voice and advocate of the American motion picture,&#8221; argued in its filing that Hotfile&#8217;s business model is identical to that of Megaupload, a popular file-sharing site that was shuttered earlier this year. &#8221;Hotfile is responsible for billions of infringing downloads of copyrighted works, including plaintiffs’ valuable motion picture and television properties,&#8221; MPAA lawyers wrote in the filing. &#8220;As with other adjudicated pirate services that came before it, from Napster and Grokster to Isohunt and Limewire, Hotfile exists to profit from copyright infringement.” The document continued, &#8221;More than 90% of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile"><img class="size-full wp-image-131101 aligncenter" title="MPAA" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/MPAA.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="279" /></a></center>
<p>The Motion Picture Association of America this week filed a motion for a summary judgement against file-sharing service Hotfile in a U.S. District Court in Florida, <em>TorrentFreak</em> reports. The MPAA, which describes itself as &#8221;the voice and advocate of the American motion picture,&#8221; argued in its filing that Hotfile&#8217;s business model is identical to that of <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/megaupload-shutdown-did-nothing-to-slow-piracy-study-finds/">Megaupload</a>, a popular file-sharing site that was <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/megaupload-com-shut-down-founder-charged-with-violating-piracy-laws/">shuttered earlier this year</a>. &#8221;Hotfile is responsible for billions of infringing downloads of copyrighted works, including plaintiffs’ valuable motion picture and television properties,&#8221; MPAA lawyers wrote in the filing. &#8220;As with other adjudicated pirate services that came before it, from Napster and Grokster to Isohunt and Limewire, Hotfile exists to profit from copyright infringement.” The document continued, &#8221;More than 90% of the files downloaded from Hotfile are copyright infringing, and nearly every Hotfile user is engaged in copyright infringement.” The MPAA hopes that its motion will convince the court to have Hotfile shut down and forced to pay damages to movie studios, thus avoiding the need for a lengthy trial.<span id="more-131069"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/hotfile-as-bad-megaupload-mpaa-tells-court-120307/">TorrentFreak</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/84379991/Mpaa-Hotfile-Summary">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/03/09/with-megaupload-down-for-the-count-mpaa-sets-sights-on-hotfile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/MPAA-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/MPAA-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-06-01 00:45:52 -->
