<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; Securities Exchange Commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/securities-exchange-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amid SEC inquiry, Facebook gets $50 billion valuation after $500 million private investment</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/03/amid-sec-inquiry-facebook-gets-50-billion-valuation-after-500-million-private-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/03/amid-sec-inquiry-facebook-gets-50-billion-valuation-after-500-million-private-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=71090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social networking giant Facebook may be looking to conquer another market, Wall Street. After news spread of a $500 million investment &#8212; $450 million from Goldman Sachs and $50 million from Russia&#8217;s Sky Technologies &#8212; Facebook was given a valuation of $50 billion by market analysts and firms. The eleven figure price tag was placed upon the privately held company even as the government&#8217;s Securities and Exchange Commission has, purportedly, launched a formal inquiry into Facebook&#8217;s private-share trading activity. According to the Times, the SEC is investigating the &#8220;increasingly hot private market for shares in Internet companies, including Facebook, Twitter, the gaming site Zynga and LinkedIn.&#8221; The government agency is looking for loopholes in the public disclosure laws that companies, investors, and firms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/goldman-invests-in-facebook-at-50-billion-valuation/?ref=technology"><img class="size-full wp-image-66971 aligncenter" title="facebook" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/facebook.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="292" /></a></center>
<p>Social networking giant Facebook may be looking to conquer another market, Wall Street. After news spread of a $500 million investment &#8212; $450 million from Goldman Sachs and $50 million from Russia&#8217;s Sky Technologies &#8212; Facebook was given a valuation of $50 billion by market analysts and firms. The eleven figure price tag was placed upon the privately held company even as the government&#8217;s Securities and Exchange Commission has, purportedly, launched a formal inquiry into Facebook&#8217;s private-share trading activity. According to the Times, the SEC is investigating the &#8220;increasingly hot private market for shares in Internet companies, including Facebook, Twitter, the gaming site Zynga and LinkedIn.&#8221; The government agency is looking for loopholes in the public disclosure laws that companies, investors, and firms may be exploiting through the use of private shares. A $50 billion valuation of Facebook makes the company&#8217;s youthful CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, worth an estimated $15 billion &#8212; more than double the estimated <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/09/23/zuckerberg-worth-6-9-billion/">$6.9 billion net-worth</a> put on Facebook&#8217;s founder back in September.<span id="more-71090"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/goldman-invests-in-facebook-at-50-billion-valuation/?ref=technology">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/03/amid-sec-inquiry-facebook-gets-50-billion-valuation-after-500-million-private-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/facebook-150x150.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google is trimming &#8220;operational expenses&#8221;; read layoffs</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2008/11/25/google-is-trimming-operational-expenses-read-10000-employees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2008/11/25/google-is-trimming-operational-expenses-read-10000-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Flores</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=9752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of how large, powerful and influential a company is, no one is recession-proof. Internet search giant Google has been laying off employees since this summer, and it has been doing so under the news radar for the most part. The SEC requires companies to disclose information regarding layoffs but apparently Google had slipped around the rule and reported its Q3 earnings as expected by saying it had cut down on &#8220;operational expenses&#8221;. Though Google officially has 20,123 employees, there are an additional 10,000 which are just labeled as temporary operational expenses. However it wants to label those human beings, they are still going to get shafted and are still going to be hurt by this massive cut in manpower.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.webguild.org/2008/11/google-layoffs-10000-workers-affected.php"><img class="alignnone" style="margin: 4px;" src="http://www.webguild.org/wp-content/uploads/google-gays.jpg" alt="" /></a></center>
<p style="text-align: left;">Regardless of how large, powerful and influential a company is, no one is recession-proof. Internet search giant Google has been laying off employees since this summer, and it has been doing so under the news radar for the most part. The SEC requires companies to disclose information regarding layoffs but apparently Google had slipped around the rule and reported its Q3 earnings as expected by saying it had cut down on &#8220;operational expenses&#8221;. Though Google officially has 20,123 employees, there are an additional 10,000 which are just labeled as temporary operational expenses. However it wants to label those human beings, they are still going to get shafted and are still going to be hurt by this massive cut in manpower. Google&#8217;s very own Sergey Brin says, “There is no question that the number (of workers) is too high”.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-9752"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Though some of these employees are temporary, they have faithfully been employed by Google for several years. The method in which it has kept temporary status and slipped under the SEC radar is by constantly moving employees around to different jobs every so often, thus retaining the temporary employee label and holding on to the bodies nonetheless. They are full time employees without full time benefits. While it&#8217;s unfortunate that many of these employees are being let go, they did last longer and enjoy more benefits (Google&#8217;s facilities) than most temps do. Times are getting tough and it shows &#8211; that&#8217;s actually water, not the usual Cristal, in Brin and Page&#8217;s hot tub.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.webguild.org/2008/11/google-layoffs-10000-workers-affected.php">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2008/11/25/google-is-trimming-operational-expenses-read-10000-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-12 12:58:28 -->
