<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; Shipments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/shipments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Growth of global TV shipments to slow in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/growth-of-global-tv-shipments-to-slow-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/growth-of-global-tv-shipments-to-slow-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GfK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=126556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The growth of global LCD TV shipments is expected to fall in 2012, according to market research firm GfK. The company believes that in 2012, growth will come from emerging markets as demand from the U.S. and Europe will subside. Global TV shipments grew 12% in 2011, and that rate is expected to slow to an estimated 7% growth rate this year. In total, GfK expects vendors to ship 225 million LCD TVs worldwide in 2012, Digitimes reports. Samsung, the world&#8217;s largest TV vendor by shipment volume, has vowed to sell more than 50 million units into global channels this year. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/growth-of-global-tv-shipments-to-fall-to-7-in-2012"><img class="size-full wp-image-118258 aligncenter" title="LCD_TV_Samsung_LE_46_B_650_Front" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/LCD_TV_Samsung_LE_46_B_650_Front.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="510" /></a></center>
<p>The growth of global LCD TV shipments is expected to fall in 2012, according to market research firm GfK. The company believes that in 2012, growth will come from emerging markets as demand from the U.S. and Europe will subside. Global TV shipments grew 12% in 2011, and that rate is expected to slow to an estimated 7% growth rate this year. In total, GfK expects vendors to ship 225 million LCD TVs worldwide in 2012, <em>Digitimes</em> reports. Samsung, the world&#8217;s largest TV vendor by shipment volume, has vowed to sell more than 50 million units into global channels this year.<span id="more-126556"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120210PD209.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/10/growth-of-global-tv-shipments-to-slow-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/LCD_TV_Samsung_LE_46_B_650_Front-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIM&#8217;s recent marketing blitz deemed a bust; BlackBerry 7 sales weakened in January</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/rims-recent-marketing-blitz-deemed-a-bust-blackberry-7-sales-weakened-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/rims-recent-marketing-blitz-deemed-a-bust-blackberry-7-sales-weakened-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canaccord Genuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=126415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When new CEO Thorsten Henis took the reins at Research In Motion, he immediately pointed to the smartphone vendor&#8217;s marketing strategy as an area the company needed to focus on if it hoped to regain share in key markets like the United States. The wheels on RIM&#8217;s recent marketing efforts had already been set in motion, however, and early reports suggest that the increased volume of familiar BlackBerry ads aren&#8217;t having the impact RIM was hoping for. Read on for more. RIM ramped up its marketing efforts in January, but the move does not appear to have paid off. &#8220;Our January checks indicated weak sell-through trends for the new BlackBerry 7 smartphones despite increased marketing efforts,&#8221; Canaccord Genuity analyst Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/rims-recent-marketing-blitz-deemed-a-bust-blackberry-7-sales-weakened-in-january"><img class="size-full wp-image-113282 aligncenter" title="BGR-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9900" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BGR-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9900.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>When new CEO Thorsten Henis took the reins at Research In Motion, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/23/meet-rims-new-ceo-video/">he immediately pointed to the smartphone vendor&#8217;s marketing strategy</a> as an area the company needed to focus on if it hoped to regain share in key markets like the United States. The wheels on RIM&#8217;s recent marketing efforts had already been set in motion, however, and early reports suggest that the increased volume of familiar BlackBerry ads aren&#8217;t having the impact RIM was hoping for. Read on for more.<span id="more-126415"></span></p>
<p>RIM ramped up its marketing efforts in January, but the move does not appear to have paid off. &#8220;Our January checks indicated weak sell-through trends for the new BlackBerry 7 smartphones despite increased marketing efforts,&#8221; Canaccord Genuity analyst Mike Walkley wrote in a research note to investors late Wednesday night. &#8220;With very strong share gains for the iPhone 4S, increasingly price competitive Android smartphones, improving Windows smartphones, and strong sales of the affordable 7 inch Amazon Kindle Fire tablet, we anticipate increasing competition across all tiers of RIM&#8217;s products in C2012.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a result of weakening device sales and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/15/rim-reports-q3-earnings-beats-lowered-guidance/">RIM&#8217;s poor outlook for the current quarter</a>, the analyst lowered his estimates for RIM&#8217;s February quarter as well as the vendor&#8217;s full fiscal year. And despite a new round of marketing that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/02/rim-launches-new-be-bold-campaign-maybe-the-superheroes-werent-so-bad-video/">kicked off in February with RIM&#8217;s &#8220;Be Bold&#8221; campaign</a>, Walkley doesn&#8217;t see much changing for the Waterloo, Ontario-based until late in 2012.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the strong share gains for Apple post the launch of the iPhone 4S and increasing Android and Windows competition in all price tiers, we believe BlackBerry 7 products will continue to struggle until BB10 products launch in late C2012,&#8221; the analyst noted. RIM expected to launch its first QNX-powered BlackBerry 10 smartphone — code-named the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/31/blackberry-london-shows-up-again-with-fresher-design/">BlackBerry London</a> — toward the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/rims-2012-roadmap-3g-playbook-curves-and-possible-london-delay/">end of the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter</a>.</p>
<p>Walkley reiterated his Hold rating on RIM&#8217;s stock and maintained his $15 price target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/09/rims-recent-marketing-blitz-deemed-a-bust-blackberry-7-sales-weakened-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/BGR-t-mobile-blackberry-bold-9900-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carriers hate the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/carriers-hate-the-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/carriers-hate-the-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=126155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s iPhone is the most profitable product offered by the most valuable company in the world. With only three iPhone models in its lineup, the Cupertino-based technology giant shipped more smartphones last quarter than any other vendor in the world. Carriers that sell Apple&#8217;s sought-after smartphone enjoy huge activation figures each quarter as a result, but activations and unit sales don&#8217;t necessarily paint a complete picture. In fact, according to some industry watchers, carriers hate the iPhone. Read on for more. Wireless carriers trip over themselves to offer Apple&#8217;s iPhone, especially in the United States. Sprint wanted the handset so badly it was willing to guarantee Apple $15.5 billion over four years for the privilege of selling its sleek smartphone, and it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/carriers-hate-the-iphone/"><img class="size-full wp-image-124480 aligncenter" title="iphone-white-back" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-white-back.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Apple&#8217;s iPhone is <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/">the most profitable product</a> offered by the most valuable company in the world. With only three iPhone models in its lineup, the Cupertino-based technology giant <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4/">shipped more smartphones last quarter than any other vendor in the world</a>. Carriers that sell Apple&#8217;s sought-after smartphone enjoy <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/at-7-6-millon-iphones-activated/">huge activation figures</a> each quarter as a result, but activations and unit sales don&#8217;t necessarily paint a complete picture. In fact, according to some industry watchers, carriers hate the iPhone. Read on for more.<span id="more-126155"></span></p>
<p>Wireless carriers trip over themselves to offer Apple&#8217;s iPhone, especially in the United States. Sprint wanted the handset so badly it was willing to guarantee Apple <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/27/sprint-says-iphone-deal-is-worth-15-5-billion/">$15.5 billion over four years</a> for the privilege of selling its sleek smartphone, and it certainly didn&#8217;t help matters much in the fourth quarter when <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/sprint-posts-1-3-billion-net-loss-in-q4-1-8m-iphones-sold-1-6m-net-subscribers-added/">Sprint posted a $1.3 billion loss</a>. <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/t-mobile-says-iphone-offers-poor-experience-points-customers-to-4g-android-phones-instead/">T-Mobile is still sour</a> over failed negotiations with Apple, and the carrier has resorted to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/22/t-mobile-now-carries-micro-sim-cards-for-iphone-4-users/">offering up free microSIM cards to iPhone users</a> willing to come aboard and forgo 3G data speeds.</p>
<p>&#8220;A logical conclusion is that the iPhone is not good for wireless carriers,&#8221; Nomura Securities analyst Mike McCormack <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/08/technology/iphone_carrier_subsidy/">told <em>CNNMoney</em></a>. &#8220;When we look at the direct and indirect economics that Apple has managed to extract from the carriers, the carrier-level value destruction is quite evident.&#8221; The site notes that Verizon Wireless&#8217;s EBITDA service margin has dropped from an average of 46.4% per quarter to 42.2% since the carrier added the iPhone to its lineup one year ago.</p>
<p>But the iPhone is a <em>necessary evil</em> for carriers that some expect to pay off in the long run. Sprint on Wednesday reported its best quarter in more than six years for net subscriber additions thanks to the 720,000 new postpaid subscribers who came to the carrier for the iPhone. Some analysts also believe carriers will eventually raise their price points on the iPhone; despite the handset&#8217;s high cost to Apple&#8217;s partners, the iPhone 4S currently starts at $199 on contract to the end user while the iPhone 4 is available for $99 and the iPhone 3GS is free on contract from AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>Regardless of what the iPhone is doing to carriers&#8217; bottom lines, it remains the best-selling smartphone in the world and it likely will for some time. Apple is expected to launch <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/27/apple-to-launch-completely-redesigned-iphone-in-fall-2012/">a completely redesigned iPhone</a> later this year that will reportedly feature a unibody aluminum case, a 4-inch display and 4G LTE connectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/carriers-hate-the-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iphone-white-back-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDC: Smartphone sales hit all-time high in Q4 led by Apple, Samsung</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/06/idc-smartphone-sales-hit-all-time-high-in-q4-led-by-apple-samsung/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/06/idc-smartphone-sales-hit-all-time-high-in-q4-led-by-apple-samsung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The record sales managed by both Apple and Samsung during the holiday quarter last year sent smartphone market growth soaring in late 2011. Market research firm IDC on Monday released data from a new report that suggests smartphone shipments grew 54.7% in the fourth quarter last year. Driven by Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S and Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S II handsets, vendors shipped 157.8 million smartphones globally last quarter according to IDC. &#8221;By the end of the quarter, one out of every three mobiles phones shipped worldwide was a smartphone,&#8221; IDC analyst Ramon Llamas said in a statement. &#8220;The launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S played a key role in smartphone growth to capture pent-up demand, and smartphone launches from other vendors also provided a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/06/idc-smartphone-sales-hit-all-time-high-in-q4-led-by-apple-samsung"><img class="size-full wp-image-124087 aligncenter" title="iphone-4s-white-bgr" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-4s-white-bgr.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>The record sales managed by both Apple and Samsung during the holiday quarter last year sent smartphone market growth soaring in late 2011. Market research firm IDC on Monday released data from a new report that suggests smartphone shipments grew 54.7% in the fourth quarter last year. <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/">Driven by Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S</a> and <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/samsung-makes-q4-official-record-4-7-billion-profit-on-42-billion-in-revenue/">Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S II handsets</a>, vendors shipped 157.8 million smartphones globally last quarter according to IDC. &#8221;By the end of the quarter, one out of every three mobiles phones shipped worldwide was a smartphone,&#8221; IDC analyst Ramon Llamas said in a statement. &#8220;The launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S played a key role in smartphone growth to capture pent-up demand, and smartphone launches from other vendors also provided a broad selection to meet varying preferences and budgets.&#8221; The firm notes that full-year smartphone shipments totaled 491.4 million units in 2011, up 61.3% over the prior year. IDC&#8217;s full press release follows below.<span id="more-125812"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Smartphone Market Hits All-Time Quarterly High Due To Seasonal Strength and Wider Variety of Offerings, According to IDC </strong></p>
<p>06 Feb 2012</p>
<p><strong>FRAMINGHAM, Mass. February 6, 2012</strong> – The worldwide smartphone market grew 54.7% year over year in the fourth quarter of 2011 (4Q11), as Apple unleashed its iPhone 4S on an eager marketplace. According to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, vendors shipped 157.8 million units in 4Q11 compared to 102.0 million units in the fourth quarter of 2010. The 54.7% year-over-year growth was higher than IDC&#8217;s forecast of 40.0% for the quarter, and higher than the 49.2% growth in 3Q11.</p>
<p>On a full-year basis, total smartphone shipment volumes reached 491.4 million units in 2011, up a strong 61.3% from the 304.7 million units in 2010. This was higher than IDC&#8217;s full year estimate of 54.7% for the year, but still below 2010&#8242;s year-over-year growth of 75.7%. Although this marks a slowdown from 2010, IDC still fully expects continued double-digit growth for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>Smartphones continued to be one of the hottest consumer electronics products in the market, and was helped along by the launch of key devices. &#8220;By the end of the quarter, one out of every three mobiles phones shipped worldwide was a smartphone,&#8221; said Ramon Llamas, senior research analyst with IDC&#8217;s Mobile Phone Technology and Trends team. &#8220;The launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S played a key role in smartphone growth to capture pent-up demand, and smartphone launches from other vendors also provided a broad selection to meet varying preferences and budgets.&#8221;</p>
<p>The variety of offerings have become more nuanced as smartphone makers try to grow their respective user bases in emerging and developed markets alike.</p>
<p>&#8220;So-called &#8216;hero&#8217; devices, such as Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy Nexus and Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S, garner the bulk of the attention heaped on the device type,&#8221; said Kevin Restivo, senior research analyst with IDC&#8217;s Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker program. &#8220;But a growing number of sub-$250 device offerings, based on the Android operating system, have allowed Google&#8217;s hardware partners to grow smartphone volumes and expand the market concurrently.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><em>Vendor Highlights</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Apple</strong> climbed back into the market leadership position with the launch of its iPhone 4S worldwide, and in the process it reached a new shipment volume record for itself and for the entire industry for a single quarter. Although the iPhone 4S disappointed some detractors by lacking 4G LTE connectivity or a different size screen, demand was high for the device. In addition, the combination of holiday seasonality, the delay in product launch from 3Q to 4Q, and the addition of multiple mobile operators helped drive volumes higher.</p>
<p><strong>Samsung </strong>marked a series of milestones for the quarter: breaking the 30 million units mark for the first time, posting the largest year-over-year increase among the top vendors, and finishing 2011 as the overall smartphone market leader. Its series of Galaxy smartphones continued to expand, with attention to both the high-end (Galaxy S II, Galaxy Nexus) and mass market (Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Y), while the company updated its Omnia and Focus smartphones with Windows Phone Mango.</p>
<p><strong>Nokia</strong> posted the largest year-over-year decrease among the top vendors, but its smartphone strategy took another step forward with the release of its first Windows Phone smartphones, the Lumia 710 and the Lumia 800. Company CEO Steve Elop claims that the company shipped &#8216;well over a million units&#8217; in its debut quarter, and is using early feedback to adjust its marketing and sales strategy. At the same time, demand for its Symbian-powered smartphones appears to have waned, and smaller volumes are expected in 2012.</p>
<p><strong>Research In Motion</strong> finished the quarter with a mixed bag of results. Its new BB OS 7-powered BlackBerry smartphones reached additional markets, and total volumes for the quarter staved off a fourth consecutive quarter of sequential decline. Still, overshadowing these results was the global network outage in October, followed by announcements that its first BB 10-powered smartphones will not arrive to market until late 2012. Such a delay gives the competition opportunity to attack RIM&#8217;s strongholds. With new Chairperson and CEO Heins in place as of January, RIM assures that change is coming both internally and externally.</p>
<p><strong>HTC</strong> maintained a strong pace of device releases during the quarter, with the launch of the Windows Phone-powered Titan and Radar models, the Beats-influenced Rezound, and the LTE-enabled Vivid in addition to multiple other Android-powered smartphones. As has been HTC&#8217;s approach all year long, these device launches kept the company&#8217;s product portfolio well attuned to both operator and end-user tastes. Despite the many high-profile launches during the quarter, however, the Taiwanese vendor still shipped lower volumes compared to the previous quarter.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Mobile Phone Vendors, Shipments, and Market Share, Q4 2011 (Units in Millions) </strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-125826" title="idc-q42011-smartphones-1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/idc-q42011-smartphones-1.png" alt="" width="627" height="216" /></p>
<p>Source: IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, February 6, 2012</p>
<p>Note: Vendor shipments are branded shipments and exclude OEM sales for all vendors.</p>
<div><iframe width="585" height="564" frameborder="0" src="http://accounts.icharts.net/icharts/embed/M3rXwypB"></iframe></div>
<p>This chart is intended for public use in online news articles and social media. Instructions on how to embed this graphic are available by clicking here.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Mobile Phone Vendors, Shipments, and Market Share Calendar Year 2011 (Units in Millions) </strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-125827" title="idc-q42011-smartphones-2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/idc-q42011-smartphones-2.png" alt="" width="627" height="217" /></p>
<p>Source: IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, February 6, 2012</p>
<p>Note: Vendor shipments are branded shipments and exclude OEM sales for all vendors.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/06/idc-smartphone-sales-hit-all-time-high-in-q4-led-by-apple-samsung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/idc-q42011-smartphones-1-128x128.png</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canalys: Smartphone shipments surpassed PC shipments in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=125645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphone shipments overtook client PC shipments for the first time in 2011, according to new data from market research firm Canalys. Vendors shipped a total of 158.5 million smartphones in the fourth quarter, representing a 57% increase compared to the 101.2 million units shipped in the same quarter a year earlier. Shipments for the full year of 2011 rose 63% to 487.7 million units, up from 299.7 million shipped in 2010. The PC market only grew 15% to 414.6 million units in 2011, which included an astonishing 274% increase in tablet shipments — tablets accounted for 15% of all PC shipments last year according to Canalys. The firm expects growth in the smartphone market to slow in 2012, with vendors putting more focus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-overtake-tablets-desktops-and-laptops-in-2011"><img class="size-full wp-image-125660 aligncenter" title="Smartphones-PCs" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="282" /></a></p>
<p>Smartphone shipments overtook client PC shipments for the first time in 2011, according to new data from market research firm Canalys. Vendors shipped a total of 158.5 million smartphones in the fourth quarter, representing a 57% increase compared to the 101.2 million units shipped in the same quarter a year earlier. Shipments for the full year of 2011 rose 63% to 487.7 million units, up from 299.7 million shipped in 2010. The PC market only grew 15% to 414.6 million units in 2011, which included an astonishing 274% increase in tablet shipments — tablets accounted for 15% of all PC shipments last year according to Canalys. The firm expects growth in the smartphone market to slow in 2012, with vendors putting more focus on profitability. Canalys&#8217;s press release follows below.</p>
<p><span id="more-125645"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Smart phones overtake client PCs in 2011</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>      Vendors shipped 488 million smart phones in 2011, compared to 415 million client PCs</li>
<li>      Apple was the leading smart phone vendor in 2011, following record Q4 shipments</li>
</ul>
<p>Palo Alto, Shanghai, Singapore and Reading – 3 February 2012</p>
<p>Canalys today released its full, detailed Q4 2011 country-level smart phone shipment estimates to clients, so completing the picture for the year. One notable result was that total annual global shipments of smart phones exceeded those of client PCs (including pads) for the first time.</p>
<p>Vendors shipped 158.5 million smart phones in Q4 2011, up 57% on the 101.2 million units shipped in Q4 2010. This bumper quarter took total global shipments for the whole of 2011 to 488.0 million units, up 63% on the 299.7 million smart phones shipped throughout 2010. By comparison, the global client PC market grew 15% in 2011 to 414.6 million units, with 274% growth in pad shipments. Pads accounted for 15% of all client PC shipments in 2011.</p>
<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-overtake-tablets-desktops-and-laptops-in-2011"><img class="aligncenter" title="Smartphones-PCs" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="282" /></a></center>
<p>“In 2011 we saw a fall in demand for netbooks, and slowing demand for notebooks and desktops as a direct result of rising interest in pads,” said Chris Jones, Canalys VP and Principal Analyst. “But pads have had negligible impact on smart phone volumes and markets across the globe have seen persistent and substantial growth through 2011. Smart phone shipments overtaking those of client PCs should be seen as a significant milestone. In the space of a few years, smart phones have grown from being a niche product segment at the high-end of the mobile phone market to becoming a truly mass-market proposition. The greater availability of smart phones at lower price points has helped tremendously, but there has been a driving trend of increasing consumer appetite for Internet browsing, content consumption and engaging with apps and services on mobile devices.”</p>
<p>However, Canalys expects to see smart phone market growth slow in 2012 as vendors exercise greater cost control and discipline, and put more focus on profitability. Notably, even vendors who have focused on conquering the low-end of the market with aggressive pricing, such as Huawei, ZTE and LG, are now placing greater attention on the higher tiers. Flagship models aimed at raising selling prices and improving margins will feature more heavily this year.</p>
<p>Apple’s impressive end to the year resulted in it becoming the leading smart phone and client PC vendor in Q4 2011, with shipments of 37.0 million iPhones, 15.4 million iPads and 5.2 million Macs. It also smashed the record for the most smart phones shipped globally by any single vendor in one quarter, beating Nokia’s previous record of 28.3 million shipped in Q4 2010. Moreover, Apple’s performance meant that it displaced Nokia, for the first time, as the leading smart phone vendor by annual shipments. Apple shipped 93.1 million iPhones in 2011, representing growth of 96% over 2010. The iPhone 4S benefitted from pent-up demand resulting from the launch coming in October rather than June, but Apple’s overall volume was also buoyed by continued shipments of the now more aggressively priced iPhone 4 and 3GS models.</p>
<p>Samsung also finished 2011 with a flourish. It shipped 35.3 million smart phones in Q4 2011 under its own brand, bringing its total to 91.9 million for the year, compared to just 24.9 million in 2010. This excludes shipments of rebranded products, such as the Nexus S and Galaxy Nexus, which Canalys counts under the Google brand. Samsung continued to spend big on marketing activities, and its strong product portfolio – particularly the Android-based Galaxy S II – performed well.</p>
<p>Despite a disappointing set of financial results, Nokia’s smart phone performance in the fourth quarter gave cause for optimism. It shipped 19.6 million smart phones, down 31% from the record high of a year earlier, but up 17% on Q3 2011. The total was helped by 1.2 million and 0.6 million shipments of its Windows Phone and MeeGo-based products respectively, as well as improved Symbian Belle volumes from competitively priced devices such as the Nokia 500, 700 and 701. Its total smart phone shipments for the year came in at 77.3 million globally.</p>
<p>“Its first Windows Phone products, the Lumia 800 and 710, along with the recently announced Lumia 900 through AT&amp;T in the US, have improved the outlook for Nokia,” said Canalys Senior Analyst, Tim Shepherd. “They are well-designed, competitive devices that demonstrate innovation is still alive within Nokia. But the battle is not over and it has huge challenges ahead. Nokia must continue to build out its Lumia portfolio with devices tailored to address all price points and all the markets in which it aims to compete. It must hasten its transition from Symbian to Windows Phone around the world and, with Microsoft, promote and generate excitement for the platform and new products. And it must succeed in attracting more developers to build high quality, locally relevant apps.”</p>
<p>RIM’s demise in 2011 has been over played by some, with the company ending the year as the fourth largest smart phone vendor and delivering annual unit growth of 5%. “There is no denying that RIM has had a tough year,” said Canalys Principal Analyst, Pete Cunningham. “But when you consider that it is transitioning to a new platform it has done well to increase volume while remaining profitable; the latter point being something that many other vendors struggle with. The appointment of Thorsten Heins as CEO will bring new energy to the company while ensuring that it does not radically deviate from its overall strategy in this transitional year. However, 2012 will become even more competitive and RIM needs BlackBerry 10 devices out there to ensure it retains its status as a major player.”</p>
<center><img class="aligncenter" title="SmartphoneShipments" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SmartphoneShipments-645x300.png" alt="" width="516" height="240" /></center>
<p>At a platform level, Android accounted for 52% of global smart phones shipments in Q4 2011, with iOS representing 23% and Symbian 12%. Android was also the leading smart phone platform by volume for the whole year, accounting for 49% of all devices shipped in 2011 and ahead of iOS with 19% share and Symbian with 16%. Collectively, Android smart phone shipments grew 149% year on year in Q4 2011 to 81.9 million units, resulting in a total of 237.8 million for the full year, up 244% on 2010. Samsung’s success and focus on Android have contributed substantially to the growth of the platform, but other vendors, such as Sony Ericsson, Huawei, Motorola, LG and particularly HTC, have also seen significant growth in their Android volumes over the course of 2011.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/03/canalys-smartphone-shipments-surpassed-pc-shipments-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Smartphones-PCs-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canalys: Apple blazes past HP to dominate global PC market in Q4</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/30/canalys-apple-blazes-past-hp-to-dominate-global-pc-market-in-q4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/30/canalys-apple-blazes-past-hp-to-dominate-global-pc-market-in-q4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canalys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultrabook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple pulled ahead of HP in the fourth quarter to become the largest player in the client PC market, a new report suggested Monday. The Cupertino-based company shipped more than 15 million iPads and 5 million Mac computers last quarter, and those figures represented 17% of all PCs shipped around the world during the fourth quarter. The report, which comes from market research firm Canalys, said PC shipments grew 16% annually to reach 120 million during the quarter, and the firm&#8217;s categorization of &#8220;PC&#8221; includes desktops, notebooks, netbooks and tablets in its figures. Tablets drove PC growth, however, and Canalys said the market would have declined by 0.4% without taking tablets into consideration. Read on for more. Overall, Acer, Dell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/30/canalys-apple-blazes-past-hp-to-dominate-global-pc-market-in-q4"><img class="size-full wp-image-113330 aligncenter" title="apple-building-sign-zurich" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/apple-building-sign-zurich.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="261" /></a></center>
<p>Apple pulled ahead of HP in the fourth quarter to become the largest player in the client PC market, a new report suggested Monday. The Cupertino-based company <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/">shipped more than 15 million iPads and 5 million Mac computers last quarter</a>, and those figures represented 17% of all PCs shipped around the world during the fourth quarter. The report, which comes from market research firm Canalys, said PC shipments grew 16% annually to reach 120 million during the quarter, and the firm&#8217;s categorization of &#8220;PC&#8221; includes desktops, notebooks, netbooks and tablets in its figures. Tablets drove PC growth, however, and Canalys said the market would have declined by 0.4% without taking tablets into consideration. Read on for more.<span id="more-124797"></span></p>
<p>Overall, Acer, Dell and HP lost market share while Apple and Lenovo increased their respective shares. &#8220;Currently, HP is pursuing a Windows strategy for its pad portfolio, producing enterprise-focused products, such as the recently launched Slate 2, until the launch of Windows 8,” said Canalys analyst Tim Coulling. “However, questions remain over Microsoft’s entry into the consumer pad space. While early demonstrations of the Window 8 operating system seem promising, Microsoft must focus its efforts on creating an intuitive user experience that is far less resource intensive.”</p>
<p>Another Canalys analyst, Michael Kauh, said that he expects to see &#8220;limited adoption&#8221; of new thinner and lighter Intel-powered ultrabooks during the first half of this year but that adoption should increase in the second half as prices fall. &#8221;In the short term though, vendors will experience more pressure in the netbook and notebook segments, especially with Apple’s annual iPad refresh approaching,&#8221; Kauh said. Canalys&#8217;s full press release follows below.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Apple storms past HP to lead global PC market</strong></p>
<p><em>120 million PCs shipped globally in Q4 2011, up 16% year-on-year</em></p>
<p><em>Shanhai, Palo Alto, Singapore and Reading &#8211; Monday, 30 January 2012</em></p>
<p>Canalys today announced that Apple, after reporting stellar results, became the leading worldwide client PC vendor in Q4 2011. Apple shipped over 15 million iPads and five million Macs, representing 17% of the total 120 million client PCs shipped globally in Q4. Overall, the total client PC market, including desktops, netbooks, notebooks, and pads grew 16% year-on-year. Excluding pads, the client PC market declined 0.4%. The floods in Thailand, that impacted hard drive assembly plants, caused mild disruption to shipments during the quarter, but the side effects are likely to be felt in the first half of 2012.</p>
<p>Among the other top five PC vendors, only Lenovo managed to increase its market share, by a relatively modest two points, compared to Apple’s six-point gain over the same quarter a year ago. Acer, Dell and HP – the hardest hit – all lost market share.  Now the second largest client PC vendor worldwide, HP will struggle to compete with Applefollowing the end of its Touchpad.</p>
<p>“Currently, HP is pursuing a Windows strategy for its pad portfolio, producing enterprise-focused products, such as the recently launched Slate 2, until the launch of Windows 8,” said Canalys Analyst Tim Coulling. “However, questions remain over Microsoft’s entry into the consumer pad space. While early demonstrations of the Window 8 operating system seem promising, Microsoft must focus its efforts on creating an intuitive user experience that is far less resource intensive.”</p>
<p>Lenovo continued to close the gap on HP, thanks to successful investment outside of core markets. The acquisition of Medion in Germany helped Lenovo double its shipments in Western Europe during the second half of 2011. The vendor’s decision to use Android for enterprise and consumer pads gives it a better opportunity than HP to continue gaining market share.</p>
<p>Dell placed fourth among the top five PC vendors, followed by Acer. Acer’s shipments continued to decline, as a result of the pad’s impact on the netbook market. It did, however, make headlines at the 2012 International Consumer Electronics Show in January, when it revealed its S5 Ultrabook. Unsurprisingly, Acer and other vendors have been quick to announce their support for the new Ultrabook form factor, with the view of driving innovation and renewed customer interest in notebooks.</p>
<p>“We expect Ultrabook volumes to see limited adoption through the first half of 2012, before finally gaining momentum later in the year as price points decline and Intel launches a new line of processors and embarks on an aggressive marketing campaign,” said Canalys Research Analyst Michael Kauh. “In the short term though, vendors will experience more pressure in the netbook and notebook segments, especially with Apple’s annual iPad refresh approaching.”</p>
<p>Pads accounted for 22% of total PC shipments during Q4 2011. In addition to Apple’s strong performance, the Amazon Kindle Fire and the Nook Tablet by Barnes and Noble boosted volumes in the U.S. market, allowing both vendors to claim spots among the top five worldwide pad makers, in second and fifth place respectively.</p>
<p>All regions grew year-on-year with the inclusion of pads. Excluding pads, however, shipments in Europe, Middle East and Africa and North America declined, due to weaker consumer demand in Western Europe and the United States, despite the traditional Q4 sales periods. Vendors and channel partners took a cautious approach to inventory levels in Q4, as many had expected a slow quarter. Notebook volumes grew slightly, at approximately 1% in these regions, but continued their impressive rise in Asia Pacific and Latin America, as more consumers embraced mobile computing.</p>
<p>“The consumerization of IT continues to be a significant disruptive force in the PC industry, but many of the leading vendors have failed to capitalize on the trend to date,” said Coulling. “This year will be a pivotal year for those vendors that were slow to launch pads. It is not just the product that they need to get right, business models are equally important &#8211; driving revenues from content delivery can help vendors reach lower price points in a market that is incredibly price sensitive.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/30/canalys-apple-blazes-past-hp-to-dominate-global-pc-market-in-q4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/apple-building-sign-zurich-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia still top vendor as global handset shipments reached 1.6 billion in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/nokia-still-top-vendor-as-global-handset-shipments-reached-1-6-billion-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/nokia-still-top-vendor-as-global-handset-shipments-reached-1-6-billion-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global mobile phone shipments grew 14% annually to shatter the previous shipment record in 2011. Market research firm Strategy Analytics estimates that 1.6 billion cell phones were shipped last year, representing more than one-fifth of the world&#8217;s total population, which surpassed 7 billion in late October last year according to the Population Reference Bureau. An earlier report from the GSMA estimated that there are now more than 6 billion total mobile connections worldwide. Read on for more. Handset shipments grew 11% to reach 445 million units globally last quarter according to Strategy Analytics, 155 million of which were smartphones. Nokia retained its No.1 position globally with mobile phone shipments totaling 113.5 million units, and Samsung followed with 95 million units. With just]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/global-handset-shipments-reached-a-staggering-1-6-billion-in-2011"><img class="size-full wp-image-124490 aligncenter" title="nokia-asha-200" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/nokia-asha-200.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="402" /></a></center>
<p>Global mobile phone shipments grew 14% annually to shatter the previous shipment record in 2011. Market research firm Strategy Analytics estimates that 1.6 billion cell phones were shipped last year, representing more than one-fifth of the world&#8217;s total population, which surpassed 7 billion in late October last year according to the Population Reference Bureau. An earlier report from the GSMA estimated that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/16/as-world-population-passes-7-billion-global-mobile-connections-to-hit-6-billion-this-month/">there are now more than 6 billion total mobile connections worldwide</a>. Read on for more.<span id="more-124488"></span></p>
<p>Handset shipments grew 11% to reach 445 million units globally last quarter according to Strategy Analytics, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4">155 million of which were smartphones</a>. Nokia retained its No.1 position globally with mobile phone shipments totaling 113.5 million units, and Samsung followed with 95 million units. With just one smartphone line that includes just three models, Apple was the world&#8217;s No.3 cell phone vendor last quarter with shipments totaling 37 million units.</p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-124493 aligncenter" title="sa-mobile-phones-q42011" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/sa-mobile-phones-q42011.png" alt="" width="562" height="279" /></center>
<p>Nokia was also the top vendor for the full year, having shipped 417.1 million phones globally according to Strategy Analytics&#8217;s figures. Samsung shipped 327.4 million units in 2011 and Apple sold 93 million iPhones into distribution channels.</p>
<p>&#8220;Smartphone specialist Apple shipped 93.0 million handsets worldwide in 2011, nearly doubling the previous year’s volumes,&#8221; Strategy Analytics analyst Tom Kang said. &#8220;Currently in just its fifth year of participation in the handset market, Apple is on track to ship well over 100 million units during 2012. China is becoming a key market for Apple this year, and we expect Apple’s share to grow rapidly in 2012, despite countless copycat rivals.&#8221; The firm&#8217;s full press release follows below.</p>
<blockquote>
<div><strong>Strategy Analytics: Global Handset Shipments Reach 1.6 Billion Units in 2011</strong></div>
<p><strong>Boston, MA &#8211; January 26, 2012</strong> – According to the latest research from Strategy Analytics, global handset shipments grew 11 percent annually to reach 445 million units in the fourth quarter of 2011. Apple was the star performer, capturing a record 8 percent market share worldwide during the quarter. Full-year handset shipments reached 1.6 billion units globally in 2011, with annual growth of 14 percent.</p>
<p>Alex Spektor, Associate Director at Strategy Analytics, said, “Despite continued macroeconomic difficulties in major markets like Western Europe, global handset shipments grew a reasonable 11 percent annually to reach 445 million units in Q4 2011. Apple was the star performer, shipping 37.0 million iPhones worldwide and capturing a highest-ever 8 percent market share. Apple’s growth was fuelled by intense demand for its refreshed iPhone 4S, as well as the availability of three generations of iPhones at a variety of price points at operators like AT&amp;T in the United States.”</p>
<p>Neil Mawston, Executive Director at Strategy Analytics, added, “Nokia’s global handset shipments declined 8 percent annually to 113.5 million units in Q4 2011. Volumes were buoyed by the sales of Nokia’s low-end dual-SIM models in emerging markets like Southeast Asia, but were a little soft overall, as initial shipments of Microsoft Lumia phones could not offset declining Symbian sales. Hot on Nokia’s heels, second-ranked Samsung captured 21 percent share with shipments of 95.0 million units. Samsung’s 18 percent annual growth was fuelled by robust shipments of its broad Galaxy-branded 3G portfolio, headlined by the Galaxy S2 superphone.”</p>
<p>Tom Kang, Director at Strategy Analytics, added, “Smartphone specialist Apple shipped 93.0 million handsets worldwide in 2011, nearly doubling the previous year’s volumes. Currently in just its fifth year of participation in the handset market, Apple is on track to ship well over 100 million units during 2012. China is becoming a key market for Apple this year, and we expect Apple’s share to grow rapidly in 2012, despite countless copycat rivals.”</p>
<p align="center">Exhibit 1: Global Handset Vendor Shipments and Market Share in Q4 2011</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">[<em>See chart above</em>]</p>
<p>The full report, <em>Global Handset Shipments Reach 445 Million Units in Q4 2011</em>, is published by the Strategy Analytics Wireless Device Strategies (WDS) service, details of which can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/3tbnzb6.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/nokia-still-top-vendor-as-global-handset-shipments-reached-1-6-billion-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/nokia-asha-200-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple reclaims No.1 smartphone spot in Q4</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is once again the top smartphone vendor in the world by shipment volume according to a report released late Thursday. Market research firm Strategy Analytics noted that total fourth-quarter smartphone shipments grew 54% year-over-year in 2011 to hit 155 million units. After losing the No.1 spot to Samsung in the third quarter last year, Apple once again shipped more smartphones than any other company in the December quarter, earning it 24% of the global market. Read on for more. Apple shipped 37 million smartphones last quarter, narrowly edged Samsung out of the top spot. According to Strategy Analytics&#8217;s estimates, the South Korea-based consumer electronics giant sold 36.5 million smartphones into distribution channels during its huge fourth quarter, representing a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4"><img class="size-full wp-image-119268 aligncenter" title="iphone-white-back" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-white-back.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Apple is once again the top smartphone vendor in the world by shipment volume according to a report released late Thursday. Market research firm Strategy Analytics noted that total fourth-quarter smartphone shipments grew 54% year-over-year in 2011 to hit 155 million units. After <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/28/samsung-blows-past-apple-to-take-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q3/">losing the No.1 spot to Samsung in the third quarter last year</a>, Apple once again shipped more smartphones than any other company in the December quarter, earning it 24% of the global market. Read on for more.<span id="more-124478"></span></p>
<p>Apple shipped 37 million smartphones last quarter, narrowly edged Samsung out of the top spot. According to Strategy Analytics&#8217;s estimates, the South Korea-based consumer electronics giant sold 36.5 million smartphones into distribution channels during its <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/samsung-makes-q4-official-record-4-7-billion-profit-on-42-billion-in-revenue/">huge fourth quarter</a>, representing a 20% share of the global smartphone market.</p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-124481 aligncenter" title="sa-vendor-share-q42011" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/sa-vendor-share-q42011.png" alt="" width="565" height="279" /></center>
<p>“Global smartphone shipments grew 54 percent annually to reach a record 155.0 million units in Q4 2011,&#8221; Strategy Analytics analyst Alex Spektor said in a statement. &#8220;Apple overtook Samsung to become the world’s largest smartphone vendor by volume with 24 percent market share. Apple’s global smartphone shipments surged 128 percent annually to 37.0 million units, as distribution of the iPhone family expanded across numerous countries, dozens of operators and multiple price points.”</p>
<p>Despite a <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/nokia-reports-huge-e1-billion-q4-loss-says-over-1-million-lumia-phones-sold/">rough quarter</a>, Strategy Analytics noted that Nokia was the No.3 smartphone vendor in the fourth quarter last year, managing worldwide smartphone shipments that totaled 19.6 million units. The firm&#8217;s full press release follows below.</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><strong>Strategy Analytics: Apple Becomes World&#8217;s Largest Smartphone Vendor in Q4 2011</strong></p>
<p><strong>Boston, MA &#8211; January 26, 2012</strong> – According to the latest research from Strategy Analytics, global smartphone shipments grew 54 percent annually to reach a record 155 million units in the fourth quarter of 2011. Apple reclaimed top position as the world’s number one smartphone vendor during the quarter.</p>
<p>Alex Spektor, Associate Director at Strategy Analytics, said, “Global smartphone shipments grew 54 percent annually to reach a record 155.0 million units in Q4 2011. Apple overtook Samsung to become the world’s largest smartphone vendor by volume with 24 percent market share. Apple’s global smartphone shipments surged 128 percent annually to 37.0 million units, as distribution of the iPhone family expanded across numerous countries, dozens of operators and multiple price points.”</p>
<p>Neil Mawston, Executive Director at Strategy Analytics, added, “While Apple took the top spot in smartphones on a quarterly basis, Samsung became the market leader in annual terms for the first time with 20 percent global share during 2011. With global smartphone shipments nearing half a billion units in 2011, Samsung is now well positioned alongside Apple in a two-horse race at the forefront of one of the world’s largest and most valuable consumer electronics markets.”</p>
<p>Tom Kang, Director at Strategy Analytics, added, “Nokia’s global smartphone market share halved from 33 percent in 2010 to 16 percent in 2011. A lackluster touchscreen smartphone portfolio and a limited presence in the huge United States market caused Nokia’s shrinkage last year. Nokia’s partnership with Microsoft will be very much in focus during 2012, and the industry will be watching closely to see how swiftly the two companies can expand in the high-value 4G LTE market that is rapidly emerging across the United States, Japan and elsewhere.”</p>
<p align="center">Exhibit 1: Global Smartphone Vendor Shipments and Market Share in Q4 2011</p>
<p>[<em>See chart above</em>]</p>
<p>The full report, <em>Apple Becomes World’s No.1 Smartphone Vendor in Q4 2011</em>, is published by the Strategy Analytics Wireless Smartphone Strategies (WSS) service, details of which can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/64cqrpr.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/27/apple-reclaims-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-white-back-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola posts $80 million Q4 loss; ships 10.5 million mobile devices including 200,000 tablets</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/motorola-posts-80-million-q4-loss-ships-10-5-million-mobile-devices-including-200000-tablets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/motorola-posts-80-million-q4-loss-ships-10-5-million-mobile-devices-including-200000-tablets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility on Thursday announced the company&#8217;s results for the fourth quarter last year. The vendor managed $3.4 billion in revenue but posted a net loss of $80 million, or $0.27 per share. Motorola posted a profit of $0.27 per share in the same quarter a year earlier. For the full year, the company&#8217;s revenue totaled $13.1 billion, up 14% compared to 2010, and it reported a net loss was $0.84 per share compared to a loss of $0.29 per share in 2010. Motorola shipped 10.5 million mobile devices in the fourth quarter, including 200,000 tablets, and full-year device shipments totaled 42.4 million units. Motorola Mobility&#8217;s full press release follows below. Motorola Mobility Announces Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Financial Results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/motorola-posts-80-million-q4-loss-ships-10-5-million-mobile-devices-including-200000-tablets/"><img class="size-full wp-image-111748 aligncenter" title="motorola-building" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/motorola-building.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="434" /></a></center>
<p>Motorola Mobility on Thursday announced the company&#8217;s results for the fourth quarter last year. The vendor managed $3.4 billion in revenue but posted a net loss of $80 million, or $0.27 per share. Motorola posted a profit of $0.27 per share in the same quarter a year earlier. For the full year, the company&#8217;s revenue totaled $13.1 billion, up 14% compared to 2010, and it reported a net loss was $0.84 per share compared to a loss of $0.29 per share in 2010. Motorola shipped 10.5 million mobile devices in the fourth quarter, including 200,000 tablets, and full-year device shipments totaled 42.4 million units. Motorola Mobility&#8217;s full press release follows below.<span id="more-124432"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Motorola Mobility Announces Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Financial Results</strong></p>
<p>LIBERTYVILLE, Ill., Jan. 26, 2012 /PRNewswire/ &#8211;</p>
<p><strong>Fourth Quarter Financial Highlights</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Net revenues of $3.4 billion</li>
<li>Non-GAAP net earnings of $0.20 per share compared to net earnings of $0.37 per share in fourth quarter 2010; GAAP net loss of $0.27 per share compared to net earnings of$0.27 per share in fourth quarter 2010</li>
<li>Mobile Devices net revenues of $2.5 billion, up 5 percent from fourth quarter 2010; Non-GAAP operating loss of $19 million; GAAP operating loss of $70 million</li>
<li>Shipped 10.5 million mobile devices, including 5.3 million smartphones</li>
<li>Home net revenues of $897 million, down 11 percent from fourth quarter 2010; Non-GAAP operating earnings of $84 million; GAAP operating earnings of $57 million</li>
</ul>
<p>Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MMI) today reported net revenues of $3.4 billion in the fourth quarter of 2011, comparable to the fourth quarter of 2010. The GAAP net loss in the fourth quarter of 2011 was $80 million, or $0.27 per share, compared to net earnings of $80 million, or $0.27 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2010. On a non-GAAP basis, net earnings in the fourth quarter 2011 were $61 million, or $0.20 per share, compared to net earnings of $108 million, or $0.37 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2010.</p>
<p>For the full year, 2011 net revenues were $13.1 billion, up 14 percent compared to 2010. For the full year, the GAAP net loss was $0.84 per share compared to a loss of $0.29 per share in 2010. On a non-GAAP basis, net earnings were $0.33 per share compared to a loss of $0.28 per share in 2010.</p>
<p>The Company generated positive operating cash flow of $225 million and $357 million in the fourth quarter and full year, respectively. Total cash at the end of the quarter was $3.6 billion and includes cash, cash equivalents, and cash deposits.</p>
<p>Details on non-GAAP adjustments and the use of non-GAAP measures are included later in this press release and in the financial tables.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the fourth quarter, we received very positive consumer response to Motorola RAZR, which combined an iconic brand with ultra-thin in an innovative smartphone.  Our Home business continues to be a leader in the industry&#8217;s transformation to all IP, with unique solutions that enable rich media experiences across any screen,&#8221; said Sanjay Jha, chairman and chief executive officer, Motorola Mobility. &#8220;We remain energized by the proposed merger with Google and continue to focus on creating innovative technologies.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Operating Results</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mobile Devices</strong> net revenues in the fourth quarter, impacted by the increased competitive environment, were $2.5 billion, up 5 percent compared with the year-ago quarter. The GAAP operating loss was $70 million compared to operating earnings of $72 million in the year-ago quarter. The non-GAAP operating loss was $19 million compared to operating earnings of $56 million in the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2011, net revenues were $9.5 billion, an increase of 22 percent compared to 2010. The 2011 GAAP operating loss was$285 million compared to an operating loss of $76 million in 2010. The 2011 non-GAAP operating loss was $126 million compared to an operating loss of $198 million in 2010.</p>
<p>The Company shipped a total of 10.5 million and 42.4 million mobile devices in the fourth quarter and full year 2011, respectively. This included 5.3 million and 18.7 million smartphones and approximately 200 thousand and 1 million tablets in the fourth quarter and full year, respectively.</p>
<p>Mobile Devices highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>Launched Motorola RAZR<sup>™</sup> extending the iconic RAZR brand around the world</li>
<li>Announced DROID RAZR MAXX<sup>™</sup>, featuring twice as much battery life as the leading competitor and measuring only 8.99 millimeters</li>
<li>Unveiled the award-winning DROID 4 by Motorola, the thinnest and most powerful 4G LTE QWERTY smartphone featuring a five-row keyboard and edge-lit keys</li>
<li>Introduced two new 4G LTE tablets, the DROID XYBOARD 10.1<sup>™</sup> and XYBOARD 8.2<sup>™</sup>.</li>
<li>Announced the &#8220;life proof&#8221; Motorola DEFY<sup>™</sup> MINI and slim MOTOLUXE<sup>™</sup>, two new value priced additions to Motorola&#8217;s growing budget-friendly portfolio</li>
<li>Shipped award-winning MOTOACTV<sup>™</sup>, the world&#8217;s first combined GPS fitness tracker and MP3 player</li>
<li>Launched two flagship devices in China – the TD-SCDMA Motorola MT917 and the Motorola XT928, a dual-core, dual-mode, dual-standby smartphone</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Home segment</strong> net revenues in the fourth quarter were $897 million, down 11 percent compared with the year-ago quarter. GAAP operating earnings were $57 million, compared to$54 million in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP operating earnings were $84 million compared to $90 million in the year-ago quarter. Fourth quarter set-top shipments were down 3 percent compared to the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2011, net revenues were $3.5 billion, compared to $3.6 billion in 2010. GAAP operating earnings increased to $226 millionfrom $152 million in 2010. The 2011 non-GAAP operating earnings increased to $332 million from $272 million in 2010. Full year set-top shipments were up 6 percent compared to 2010.</p>
<p>Home highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>Launched DreamGallery next-generation HTML-5 video navigation software in North America with Shaw Communications</li>
<li>Expanded video leadership and paved the way for Canada&#8217;s move to all-MPEG-4 broadcast and On-Demand HD services with Eastlink</li>
<li>Demonstrated market leadership with introduction of new carrier Ethernet product line for the deployment of cost-effective commercial services</li>
<li>Introduced Motorola APEX3000, which delivers market-leading density to cost-effectively add greater demand for narrowcast services such as VOD and DVR</li>
<li>Selected by Altibox AS in Norway to provide VAP 2400 HD wireless video bridge to enable multi-room TV services</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Merger Update</strong></p>
<p>As previously announced on August 15, 2011, Motorola Mobility and Google Inc. (&#8220;Google&#8221;) (NASDAQ: GOOG) entered into a definitive agreement for Google to acquire Motorola Mobility for $40.00 per share in cash, or a total of approximately $12.5 billion.  On November 17, 2011, Motorola Mobility stockholders voted overwhelmingly to approve the proposed merger with Google at the Company&#8217;s Special Meeting of Stockholders.  The Company continues to work closely with Google to complete the proposed acquisition of Motorola Mobility as expeditiously as possible.</p>
<p>The Company notes that the transaction remains subject to various closing conditions. Antitrust clearances, or waiting period expirations, are required by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), by the European Commission, and in Canada, China, Israel, Russia, Taiwan and Turkey. Requisite filings have been submitted to the appropriate regulatory body in each of these jurisdictions. Clearances have been received in Turkey and Russia. In Canada and the United States, the statutory waiting period for the transaction has expired although the parties have been informed that the reviewing agencies have not closed their respective investigations.  In December 2011, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce proceeded to phase two of its investigation.  In February, the European Commission is expected to announce whether it will close its investigation or proceed to a phase two investigation.</p>
<p>The Company currently expects the transaction to close in early 2012 once all conditions have been satisfied and reminds stockholders that it is possible that the failure to timely meet such conditions or other factors outside of the Company&#8217;s control could delay or prevent completion of the transaction altogether.</p>
<p>For more information on the proposed merger, please visit http://investors.motorola.com.</p>
<p><strong>Conference Call and Webcast</strong></p>
<p>In light of the pending acquisition of the Company by Google, the Company does not conduct a financial analyst conference call or webcast following the release of its earnings information nor provide financial guidance. To access the fourth quarter results and other financial information, please visit http://investors.motorola.com.</p>
<p><strong>Consolidated GAAP Results</strong></p>
<p>A comparison of results from operations is as follows:</p>
<div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col /></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="6" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Fourth Quarter</strong></span></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Full Year</strong></span></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><em>(In millions, except per share amounts)</em></td>
<td valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>2011</strong></span></td>
<td valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>2010</strong></span></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>2011</strong></span></td>
<td valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>2010</strong></span></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Net revenues</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,436</td>
<td valign="bottom">$3,425</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">$13,064</td>
<td valign="bottom">$11,460</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Gross margin</td>
<td valign="bottom">854</td>
<td valign="bottom">915</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">3,317</td>
<td valign="bottom">2,965</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Operating earnings (loss)</td>
<td valign="bottom">(78)</td>
<td valign="bottom">126</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">(142)</td>
<td valign="bottom">76</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Earnings (loss) before income taxes</td>
<td valign="bottom">(78)</td>
<td valign="bottom">110</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">(148)</td>
<td valign="bottom">(4)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Net earnings (loss) attributable to Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.</td>
<td valign="bottom">($80)</td>
<td valign="bottom">$80</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">($249)</td>
<td valign="bottom">($86)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Basic earnings (loss) per common share *</td>
<td valign="bottom">($0.27)</td>
<td valign="bottom">$0.27</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">($0.84)</td>
<td valign="bottom">($0.29)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Diluted loss per common share*</td>
<td valign="bottom">($0.27)</td>
<td valign="bottom">N/A</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">($0.84)</td>
<td valign="bottom">N/A</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Weighted average common shares outstanding</span></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">   Basic</td>
<td valign="bottom">300.2</td>
<td valign="bottom">294.3</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">297.1</td>
<td valign="bottom">294.3</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">   Diluted</td>
<td valign="bottom">300.2</td>
<td valign="bottom">N/A</td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">297.1</td>
<td valign="bottom">N/A</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><strong>Non-GAAP Adjustments for fourth quarter and full year 2011 and 2010</strong></p>
<div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col /></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Fourth Quarter</strong></span></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Per Share Impact</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2010</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>GAAP Earnings (Loss) per Common Share *</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>($0.27)</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$0.27</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Merger-related costs**</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.22</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Reorganization of business charges</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.09</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.06</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Stock-based compensation expense</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.12</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.14</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Intangible assets amortization expense</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.04</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.05</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Joint venture wind-down costs</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.03</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">IP settlement</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td valign="bottom">(0.19)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Total Non-GAAP Adjustments ***</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>0.47</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>0.10</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Non-GAAP Earnings per Common Share *</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$0.20</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$0.37</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col /></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Full Year</strong></span></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Per Share Impact</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2011</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>2010</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>GAAP Loss per Common Share *</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>($0.84)</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>($0.29)</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Merger-related costs**</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.28</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Reorganization of business charges</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.09</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.20</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Stock-based compensation expense</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.52</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.55</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Intangible assets amortization expense</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.20</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.19</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Legal claim provision</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.07</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Joint venture wind-down costs</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td valign="bottom">0.03</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Legal settlement</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td valign="bottom">(0.77)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">IP settlement</td>
<td valign="bottom">&#8212;&#8212;</td>
<td valign="bottom">(0.19)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Total Non-GAAP Adjustments ***</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>1.16</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>0.01</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) per Common Share *</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>$0.33</strong></td>
<td valign="bottom"><strong>($0.28)</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/motorola-posts-80-million-q4-loss-ships-10-5-million-mobile-devices-including-200000-tablets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/motorola-building-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s grip on tablet market said to be loosening as Android shipments tripled in Q4</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/apples-grip-on-tablet-market-said-to-be-loosening-as-android-shipments-tripled-in-q4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/apples-grip-on-tablet-market-said-to-be-loosening-as-android-shipments-tripled-in-q4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple sold more iPads in the fourth calendar quarter than it has ever sold before in a single three-month period, but the 15.4 million tablets it managed to move weren&#8217;t enough to keep Google from gaining ground. Market research firm strategy analytics on Thursday released its tablet estimates for the three months ended December 2011, and Google&#8217;s Android partners seemingly managed to triple tablet shipments during the holiday quarter last year. Read on for more. Strategy Analytics estimates that Apple&#8217;s 15.4 million iPads shipped was good enough to capture 57.6% of the tablet market in the fourth quarter last year. In the same quarter a year earlier, Apple shipped 7.3 million tablets and accounted for 68.2% of the global market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/apples-grip-on-tablet-market-said-to-be-loosening-as-android-shipments-tripled-in-q4"><img class="size-full wp-image-109147 aligncenter" title="apple-ipad-21" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/apple-ipad-21.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="333" /></a></center>
<p>Apple sold more iPads in the fourth calendar quarter than it has ever sold before in a single three-month period, but <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/">the 15.4 million tablets it managed to move</a> weren&#8217;t enough to keep Google from gaining ground. Market research firm strategy analytics on Thursday released its tablet estimates for the three months ended December 2011, and Google&#8217;s Android partners seemingly managed to triple tablet shipments during the holiday quarter last year. Read on for more.<span id="more-124283"></span></p>
<p>Strategy Analytics estimates that Apple&#8217;s 15.4 million iPads shipped was good enough to capture 57.6% of the tablet market in the fourth quarter last year. In the same quarter a year earlier, Apple shipped 7.3 million tablets and accounted for 68.2% of the global market.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Android partners combined to ship 10.5 million tablets in the December quarter, good for a 39.1% share of the market. Android vendors shipped just 3.1 million tablets in the fourth quarter of 2010, which accounted for 29% of the market.</p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-124292 aligncenter" title="strategy-analytics-tablets-q42011" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/strategy-analytics-tablets-q42011.png" alt="" width="483" height="302" /></center>
<p>&#8220;Global tablet shipments reached an all-time high of 26.8 million units in Q4 2011, surging 150 percent from 10.7 million in Q4 2010,&#8221; Strategy analytics analyst Peter King said in a statement. &#8221;Demand for tablets among consumer, business and education users remains strong. Apple shipped a robust 15.4 million iPads worldwide and maintained its strong market leadership with 58 percent share during the fourth quarter of 2011. Apple shrugged off the much-hyped threat from entry-level Android models this quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s iPad business is still growing rapidly, and chief executive Tim Cook said on a recent earnings call that <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/amazons-kindle-fire-had-no-impact-on-ipad-sales-apple-ceo-says/">Amazon&#8217;s popular Kindle Fire tablet had no impact whatsoever on Apple tablet sales</a>. It appears as though a broader media tablet market is finally beginning to form around what had essentially just been an iPad market until recently, however.</p>
<p>Strategy Analytics&#8217;s full press release follows below.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Strategy Analytics: Android Captures Record 39 Percent Share of Global Tablet Shipments in Q4 2011</strong></p>
<p><strong>Boston, MA &#8211; </strong><strong>January 26, 2012</strong><strong> – According to the latest research from Strategy Analytics, global tablet shipments reached 27 million units in the fourth quarter of 2011. Android jumped to a record 39 percent global share, while Apple iOS maintained its strong leadership at 58 percent.</strong></p>
<p>Peter King, Director at Strategy Analytics, said, “Global tablet shipments reached an all-time high of 26.8 million units in Q4 2011, surging 150 percent from 10.7 million in Q4 2010. Demand for tablets among consumer, business and education users remains strong. Apple shipped a robust 15.4 million iPads worldwide and maintained its strong market leadership with 58 percent share during the fourth quarter of 2011. Apple shrugged off the much-hyped threat from entry-level Android models this quarter.”</p>
<p>Neil Mawston, Executive Director at Strategy Analytics, added, “Android captured a record 39 percent share of global tablet shipments in Q4 2011, rising from 29 percent a year earlier. Global Android tablet shipments tripled annually to 10.5 million units. Dozens of Android models distributed across multiple countries by numerous brands such as Amazon, Samsung, Asus and others have been driving volumes. Android is so far proving relatively popular with tablet manufacturers despite nagging concerns about fragmentation of Android’s operating system, user-interface and app store ecosystem.”</p>
<p>Other findings from the research include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Global tablet shipments hit 66.9 million units in full-year 2011, surging 260 percent from 18.6 million in full-year 2010. Consumers are increasingly buying tablets in preference to netbooks and even entry-level notebooks or desktops;</li>
<li>Microsoft captured a niche 1 percent global tablet share in Q4 2011. The upcoming release of Windows 8 this year cannot come quickly enough for Microsoft, so its hardware partners can start competing more effectively in the tablet space.</li>
</ul>
<p align="center">Exhibit 1: Global Tablet Operating System Shipments and Market Share in Q4 2011</p>
<div align="center">
<table width="298" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Global Tablet OS Shipments (Millions of Units)</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">Q4 &#8217;10</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">Q4 &#8217;11</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Apple iOS</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">7.3</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">15.4</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Android</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">3.1</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">10.5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Microsoft</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">0.0</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">0.4</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Others</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">0.3</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">0.5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Total</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">10.7</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">26.8</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221"></td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38"></td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Global Tablet OS Marketshare %</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">Q4 &#8217;10</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">Q4 &#8217;11</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Apple iOS</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">68.2%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">57.6%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Android</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">29.0%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">39.1%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Microsoft</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">0.0%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">1.5%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Others</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">2.8%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">1.9%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Total</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">100.0%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">100.0%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221"></td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38"></td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="221">Growth Year-over-Year %</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">N / A</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap="nowrap" width="38">
<p align="right">150%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>The full report, <em>Global Tablet OS Market Share: Q4 2011</em>, is published by the Strategy Analytics Tablet &amp; Touchscreen (TTS) service, details of which can be found here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/78qpf5u">http://tinyurl.com/78qpf5u</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/26/apples-grip-on-tablet-market-said-to-be-loosening-as-android-shipments-tripled-in-q4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/apple-ipad-21-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q4 iPhone sales reportedly topped all Android phones combined</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/q4-iphone-sales-reportedly-topped-all-android-phones-combined/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/q4-iphone-sales-reportedly-topped-all-android-phones-combined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kantar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s monster holiday quarter is the talk of the tech world, with the technology giant having just reported the second most profitable quarter ever among U.S. companies. The company&#8217;s $13.06 billion in fiscal first-quarter profit on revenue that surpassed $46 billion is staggering, and iPhone shipments that surpassed 37 million units played a huge role in Apple&#8217;s record-setting quarter. While market share is a statistic many deem unimportant, another impressive entry in Apple&#8217;s laundry least of first-quarter feats may be one of its most impressive yet: with just three models currently available, Apple&#8217;s share of the smartphone market may have surpassed that of Android in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011. Read on for more. According to new data from analysts at]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/q4-iphone-sales-reportedly-topped-all-android-phones-combined"><img class="size-full wp-image-123435 aligncenter" title="iphone-4s-white-bgr" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-4s-white-bgr.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Apple&#8217;s monster holiday quarter is the talk of the tech world, with the technology giant having just reported <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/">the second most profitable quarter ever among U.S. companies</a>. The company&#8217;s $13.06 billion in fiscal first-quarter profit on revenue that surpassed $46 billion is staggering, and iPhone shipments that surpassed 37 million units played a huge role in Apple&#8217;s record-setting quarter. While market share is a statistic many deem unimportant, another impressive entry in Apple&#8217;s laundry least of first-quarter feats may be one of its most impressive yet: with just three models currently available, Apple&#8217;s share of the smartphone market may have surpassed that of Android in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011. Read on for more.<span id="more-124085"></span></p>
<p>According to new data from analysts at Kantar Worldpanel ComTech, the record-breaking launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S drove iPhone sales that surpassed combined Android smartphone sales in the fourth calendar quarter last year. Apple shipped 37.04 million iPhones last quarter, which lifted the company&#8217;s smartphone market share up to 44.9% according to Kantar analyst Dominic Sunnebo. The figure is roughly double Apple&#8217;s market share in the same quarter a year earlier.</p>
<p>In the same quarter, Kantar estimates that the combined market share of all Android phones slid to 44.8% from 50%. &#8221;Overall, Apple sales are now growing at a faster rate than Android across the nine countries we cover,&#8221; Sunnebo <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/25/us-apple-google-microsoft-idUSTRE80O0NL20120125">told <em>Reuters</em></a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/28/samsung-blows-past-apple-to-take-no-1-smartphone-spot-in-q3/">Samsung become the No.1 smartphone vendor by shipment volume in the third quarter last year</a>, but that title is expected to have been retaken by Apple by a wide margin in the fourth calendar quarter of 2011. Samsung is scheduled to report earnings for its holiday quarter on Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/25/q4-iphone-sales-reportedly-topped-all-android-phones-combined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-4s-white-bgr-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Disappointing&#8217; iPhone 4S leads Apple to most profitable quarter in tech history</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=124017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Disappointing&#8221; though it may have been to some, the iPhone 4S propelled what is now confirmed to have been the most profitable quarter any technology company has ever recorded. Apple on Wednesday reported record earnings for the December quarter, revealing a profit of $13.06 billion on revenue that surpassed $46 billion. Among technology companies, Apple&#8217;s fiscal first quarter represents the most profitable quarter ever recorded. Only one U.S. company has ever posted a more profitable quarter — Exxon managed a profit of $14.8 billion in the third quarter of 2008 — and the driving force behind Apple&#8217;s record-setting performance was quite clearly the iPhone. Read on for more. Apple sold a record 37.04 million iPhone handsets into channels last quarter, along with]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history"><img class="size-full wp-image-122554 aligncenter" title="iphone-4s-box-light" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-4s-box-light.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="377" /></a></center>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/05/apples-fall-from-grace/">Disappointing</a>&#8221; though it may have been to some, the iPhone 4S propelled what is now confirmed to have been the most profitable quarter any technology company has ever recorded. Apple on Wednesday reported <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/">record earnings for the December quarter</a>, revealing a profit of $13.06 billion on revenue that surpassed $46 billion. Among technology companies, Apple&#8217;s fiscal first quarter represents the most profitable quarter ever recorded. Only one U.S. company has ever posted a more profitable quarter — Exxon managed a profit of $14.8 billion in the third quarter of 2008 — and the driving force behind Apple&#8217;s record-setting performance was quite clearly the iPhone. Read on for more.<span id="more-124017"></span></p>
<p>Apple sold a record 37.04 million iPhone handsets into channels last quarter, along with 15.43 million iPad tablets and 15.4 million iPods. No single smartphone line has ever moved more units in a single quarter, and no mobile portfolio has ever pulled in anywhere near the revenue and profit Apple has managed with its current iOS lineup. To cap things off, Apple reported that the total value of its cash and marketable securities reached $97.6 billion at the end of the first fiscal quarter. This almost certainly means that as of Wednesday when Apple reported its earnings, the company had amassed well over $100 billion in cash on hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/disappointing-iphone-4s-leads-apple-to-most-profitable-quarter-in-tech-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone-4s-box-light-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple reports record Q1 blowout, biggest quarter ever with 37 million iPhones, 15.4 million iPad sold</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S. Geller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a rare miss in the fourth quarter, Apple on Tuesday reported record earnings in the fiscal first quarter that crushed expectations. Wall Street&#8217;s consensus pointed to earnings of $10.06 per share on revenue of $39 billion, and Apple came in way above expectations with revenue of $46.33 and earnings of $13.87 per share. Following the record-breaking launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S, a number of analysts were expecting iPhone shipments to come in at 40 million units or more for the December quarter. The numbers are now in, and Apple managed to move 37 million iPhone handsets, which includes the iPhone 4S, iPhone 4 and the free-on-contract iPhone 3G. IPad shipments totaled 15.4 tablets million last quarter, and Apple also managed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-124009 aligncenter" title="Apple-Paris-BGR" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Apple-Paris-BGR.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="431" /></center>
<p>Following <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/18/apple-reports-q4-earnings-misses-big-on-iphone-sales/">a rare miss in the fourth quarter</a>, Apple on Tuesday reported record earnings in the fiscal first quarter that crushed expectations. Wall Street&#8217;s consensus pointed to earnings of $10.06 per share on revenue of $39 billion, and Apple came in way above expectations with revenue of $46.33 and earnings of $13.87 per share. Following <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/17/apple-sells-over-4-million-iphone-4s-phones-first-weekend/">the record-breaking launch of Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4S</a>, a number of analysts were expecting iPhone shipments to come in at 40 million units or more for the December quarter. The numbers are now in, and Apple managed to move 37 million iPhone handsets, which includes the iPhone 4S, iPhone 4 and the free-on-contract iPhone 3G. IPad shipments totaled 15.4 tablets million last quarter, and Apple also managed to ship 15.4 million iPods and 5.2 million Mac computers. Apple shipped 17.1 million iPhones, 11.1 million iPads, 6.62 million iPods and 4.89 million Macs in the fiscal fourth quarter and 16.24 million iPhones, 7.33 million iPads, 4.13 million Macs and 19.45 million iPods in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The full press release follows below.<span id="more-123756"></span></p>
<p>&#8211;All-Time Record iPhone, iPad and Mac Sales</p>
<p>Apple(R) today announced financial results for its fiscal 2012 first quarter which spanned 14 weeks and ended December 31, 2011. The Company posted record quarterly revenue of $46.33 billion and record quarterly net profit of $13.06 billion, or $13.87 per diluted share. These results compare to revenue of $26.74 billion and net quarterly profit of $6 billion, or $6.43 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 44.7 percent compared to 38.5 percent in the year-ago quarter. International sales accounted for 58 percent of the quarter&#8217;s revenue.</p>
<p>The Company sold 37.04 million iPhones in the quarter, representing 128 percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter. Apple sold 15.43 million iPads during the quarter, a 111 percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter. The Company sold 5.2 million Macs during the quarter, a 26 percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter. Apple sold 15.4 million iPods, a 21 percent unit decline from the year-ago quarter.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re thrilled with our outstanding results and record-breaking sales of iPhones, iPads and Macs,&#8221; said Tim Cook, Apple&#8217;s CEO. &#8220;Apple&#8217;s momentum is incredibly strong, and we have some amazing new products in the pipeline.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We are very happy to have generated over $17.5 billion in cash flow from operations during the December quarter,&#8221; said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple&#8217;s CFO. &#8220;Looking ahead to the second fiscal quarter of 2012, which will span 13 weeks, we expect revenue of about $32.5 billion and we expect diluted earnings per share of about $8.50.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple will provide live streaming of its Q1 2012 financial results conference call beginning at 2:00 p.m. PST on January 24, 2012 at www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/earningsq112. This webcast will also be available for replay for approximately two weeks thereafter.</p>
<p>This press release contains forward-looking statements including without limitation those about the Company&#8217;s estimated revenue and earnings per share. These statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ. Risks and uncertainties include without limitation the effect of competitive and economic factors, and the Company&#8217;s reaction to those factors, on consumer and business buying decisions with respect to the Company&#8217;s products; continued competitive pressures in the marketplace; the ability of the Company to deliver to the marketplace and stimulate customer demand for new programs, products, and technological innovations on a timely basis; the effect that product introductions and transitions, changes in product pricing or mix, and/or increases in component costs could have on the Company&#8217;s gross margin; the inventory risk associated with the Company&#8217;s need to order or commit to order product components in advance of customer orders; the continued availability on acceptable terms, or at all, of certain components and services essential to the Company&#8217;s business currently obtained by the Company from sole or limited sources; the effect that the Company&#8217;s dependency on manufacturing and logistics services provided by third parties may have on the quality, quantity or cost of products manufactured or services rendered; risks associated with the Company&#8217;s international operations; the Company&#8217;s reliance on third-party intellectual property and digital content; the potential impact of a finding that the Company has infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; the Company&#8217;s dependency on the performance of distributors, carriers and other resellers of the Company&#8217;s products; the effect that product and service quality problems could have on the Company&#8217;s sales and operating profits; the continued service and availability of key executives and employees; war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, and other circumstances that could disrupt supply, delivery, or demand of products; and unfavorable results of other legal proceedings. More information on potential factors that could affect the Company&#8217;s financial results is included from time to time in the &#8220;Risk Factors&#8221; and &#8220;Management&#8217;s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations&#8221; sections of the Company&#8217;s public reports filed with the SEC, including the Company&#8217;s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2011 and its Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 to be filed with the SEC. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information, which speak as of their respective dates.</p>
<p>Apple designs Macs, the best personal computers in the world, along with OS X, iLife, iWork and professional software. Apple leads the digital music revolution with its iPods and iTunes online store. Apple has reinvented the mobile phone with its revolutionary iPhone and App Store, and is defining the future of mobile media and computing devices with iPad.</p>
<p>NOTE TO EDITORS: For additional information visit Apple&#8217;s PR website (www.apple.com/pr), or call Apple&#8217;s Media Helpline at (408) 974-2042.</p>
<p>(C) 2012 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS and Macintosh are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.</p>
<div><a>View data</a>Apple Inc. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands and per share amounts) Three Months Ended &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; December 31, 2011 December 25, 2010 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Net sales $ 46,333 $ 26,741 Cost of sales (1) 25,630 16,443 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Gross margin 20,703 10,298 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Operating expenses: Research and development (1) 758 575 Selling, general and administrative (1) 2,605 1,896 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Total operating expenses 3,363 2,471 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Operating income 17,340 7,827 Other income and expense 137 136 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Income before provision for income taxes 17,477 7,963 Provision for income taxes 4,413 1,959 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Net income $ 13,064 $ 6,004 ======== ======== Earnings per common share: Basic $ 14.03 $ 6.53 Diluted $ 13.87 $ 6.43 Shares used in computing earnings per share: Basic 931,041 919,294 Diluted 941,572 933,154 (1) Includes share-based compensation expense as follows: Cost of sales $ 63 $ 52 Research and development $ 160 $ 113 Selling, general and administrative $ 197 $ 134</div>
<div><a>View data</a>Apple Inc. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands) December 31, 2011 September 24, 2011 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; ASSETS: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,310 $ 9,815 Short-term marketable securities 19,846 16,137 Accounts receivable, less allowances of $78 and $53, respectively 8,930 5,369 Inventories 1,236 776 Deferred tax assets 1,937 2,014 Vendor non-trade receivables 7,554 6,348 Other current assets 4,958 4,529 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total current assets 54,771 44,988 Long-term marketable securities 67,445 55,618 Property, plant and equipment, net 7,816 7,777 Goodwill 896 896 Acquired intangible assets, net 3,472 3,536 Other assets 4,281 3,556 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total assets $ 138,681 $ 116,371 ======== ========= LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS&#8217; EQUITY: Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 18,221 $ 14,632 Accrued expenses 11,500 9,247 Deferred revenue 4,886 4,091 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total current liabilities 34,607 27,970 Deferred revenue &#8211; non-current 2,187 1,686 Other non-current liabilities 11,833 10,100 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total liabilities 48,627 39,756 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Commitments and contingencies Shareholders&#8217; equity: Common stock, no par value; 1,800,000 shares authorized; 932,214 and 13,961 13,331 929,277 shares issued and outstanding, respectively Retained earnings 75,709 62,841 Accumulated other comprehensive income 384 443 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total shareholders&#8217; equity 90,054 76,615 &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Total liabilities and shareholders&#8217; equity $ 138,681 $ 116,371 ======== =========</div>
<div><a>View data</a>Apple Inc. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In millions) Three Months Ended &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- December 31, 2011 December 25, 2010 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period $ 9,815 $ 11,261 &#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;- Operating activities: Net income 13,064 6,004 Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash generated by operating activities: Depreciation, amortization and accretion 721 356 Share-based compensation expense 420 299 Deferred income tax expense 1,456 823 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, net (3,561 ) (517 ) Inventories (460 ) 166 Vendor non-trade receivables (1,206 ) (433 ) Other current and non-current assets (962 ) (558 ) Accounts payable 4,314 2,346 Deferred revenue 1,296 634 Other current and non-current liabilities 2,472 653 &#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;- Cash generated by operating activities 17,554 9,773 &#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;- Investing activities: Purchases of marketable securities (40,175 ) (19,575 ) Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities 3,038 3,279 Proceeds from sales of marketable securities 21,472 6,853 Payments for acquisition of property, plant and equipment (1,321 ) (1,214 ) Payments for acquisition of intangible assets (108 ) (49 ) Other (34 ) (23 ) &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; Cash used in investing activities (17,128 ) (10,729 ) &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; Financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock 91 208 Excess tax benefits from equity awards 333 454 Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards (355 ) (233 ) &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; Cash generated by financing activities 69 429 &#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;- Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 495 (527 ) &#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211; Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period $ 10,310 $ 10,734 ======= ======= Supplemental cash flow disclosure: Cash paid for income taxes, net $ 1,474 $ 826</div>
<div><a>View data</a>Apple Inc. Q1 2012 Unaudited Summary Data (Units in thousands, Revenue in millions) Q4 2011 Q1 2011 Q1 2012 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Sequential Change Year/Year Change &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Operating Segments Mac Revenue Mac Revenue Mac Revenue Mac Units Revenue Mac Units Revenue Units Units Units &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Americas 1,716 $ 9,648 1,360 $ 9,218 1,612 $ 17,714 &#8211; 6 % 84 % 19 % 92 % Europe 1,176 7,397 1,245 7,256 1,482 11,256 26 % 52 % 19 % 55 % Japan 175 1,111 162 1,433 184 3,550 5 % 220 % 14 % 148 % Asia Pacific 731 6,530 516 4,987 814 7,697 11 % 18 % 58 % 54 % Retail 1,096 3,584 851 3,847 1,106 6,116 1 % 71 % 30 % 59 % &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; Total Operating Segments 4,894 $ 28,270 4,134 $ 26,741 5,198 $ 46,333 6 % 64 % 26 % 73 % ====== === ====== ====== === ====== ====== === ====== Sequential Change Year/Year Change &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Product Summary Units Revenue Units Revenue Units Revenue Units Revenue Units Revenue &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Mac Desktops (1)(9) 1,278 $ 1,687 1,227 $ 1,731 1,479 $ 1,936 16 % 15 % 21 % 12 % Mac Portables (2)(9) 3,616 4,585 2,907 3,699 3,719 4,662 3 % 2 % 28 % 26 % &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; Subtotal Mac 4,894 6,272 4,134 5,430 5,198 6,598 6 % 5 % 26 % 22 % iPod (3)(9) 6,622 1,103 19,446 3,425 15,397 2,528 133 % 129 % &#8211; 21 % &#8211; 26 % Other Music Related Products and Services (4) 1,678 1,431 2,027 21 % 42 % iPhone and Related Products and Services (5)(9) 17,073 10,980 16,235 10,468 37,044 24,417 117 % 122 % 128 % 133 % iPad and Related Products and Services (6)(9) 11,123 6,868 7,331 4,608 15,434 9,153 39 % 33 % 111 % 99 % Peripherals and Other Hardware (7) 640 593 766 20 % 29 % Software, Service and Other Sales (8) 729 786 844 16 % 7 % &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212; Total Apple $ 28,270 $ 26,741 $ 46,333 64 % 73 % === ====== === ====== === ====== (1) Includes revenue from iMac, Mac mini and Mac Pro sales. (2) Includes revenue from MacBook, MacBook Air and MacBook Pro sales. (3) Includes revenue from iPod sales. (4) Includes revenue from sales from the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore in addition to sales of iPod services and Apple-branded and third-party iPod accessories. (5) Includes revenue from sales of iPhone, iPhone services, and Apple-branded and third-party iPhone accessories. (6) Includes revenue from sales of iPad, iPad services, and Apple-branded and third-party iPad accessories. (7) Includes revenue from sales of displays, networking products, and other hardware. (8) Includes revenue from sales of Apple-branded and third-party Mac software, and services. (9) Includes amortization of related revenue deferred for non-software services and embedded software upgrade rights.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/24/apple-reports-record-q1-blowout-biggest-quarter-ever-with-37-million-iphone-15-4-million-ipad-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/apple-logo-sign-01-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kindle Fire demand cooling off? Amazon sales charts say otherwise</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/20/kindle-fire-demand-cooling-off-amazon-sales-charts-say-otherwise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/20/kindle-fire-demand-cooling-off-amazon-sales-charts-say-otherwise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following what Amazon reported to have been a huge holiday season for the company&#8217;s debut tablet, demand for the Kindle Fire has slowed according to new claims. Citing unnamed sources from within Amazon&#8217;s component supply chain, DigiTimes on Friday stated that Amazon&#8217;s tablet orders with original device manufacturers have been cut in half from roughly 6 million tablets in the fourth quarter last year to 3 million units this quarter. The Kindle Fire had a hot holiday season so a drop-off in orders is expected in the quarter that follows, though it is unclear if a 50% decrease in device orders is industry standard. What is clear, however, is that Amazon — one of the largest electronics retailers in the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/20/kindle-fire-demand-cooling-off-amazon-sales-charts-say-otherwise"><img class="size-full wp-image-115047 aligncenter" title="BGR-amazon-kindle-fire-01" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BGR-amazon-kindle-fire-01.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Following what Amazon reported to have been <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/29/amazon-more-than-4-million-kindles-sold-this-holiday-season/">a huge holiday season</a> for the company&#8217;s debut tablet, demand for the Kindle Fire has slowed according to new claims. Citing unnamed sources from within Amazon&#8217;s component supply chain, <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120119PD214.html"><em>DigiTimes</em> on Friday stated</a> that Amazon&#8217;s tablet orders with original device manufacturers have been cut in half from roughly 6 million tablets in the fourth quarter last year to 3 million units this quarter. The Kindle Fire had a hot holiday season so a drop-off in orders is expected in the quarter that follows, though it is unclear if a 50% decrease in device orders is industry standard. What is clear, however, is that Amazon — one of the largest electronics retailers in the country — is still selling plenty of Kindle Fires. <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/11/22/amazon-kindle-fire-review-its-no-ipad-killer-and-that-is-why-it-will-succeed/">We reviewed the Kindle Fire in November</a> and called it a clear winner that would top Amazon&#8217;s best-selling electronics list for quite some time. Now, more than two months after being released on November 15th last year, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics/zgbs/electronics/ref=zg_bs_nav_0">the $199 Kindle Fire tablet still holds the No.1 spot on Amazon&#8217;s best-sellers list</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/20/kindle-fire-demand-cooling-off-amazon-sales-charts-say-otherwise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/BGR-amazon-kindle-fire-01-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acer chairman eyes MacBook Air-like ultrabooks for PC growth</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/acer-chairman-eyes-macbook-air-like-ultrabooks-for-pc-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/acer-chairman-eyes-macbook-air-like-ultrabooks-for-pc-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JT Wang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrabooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acer chairman JT Wang on Thursday reaffirmed the company&#8217;s dedication to the new &#8220;ultrabook&#8221; market, further distancing his company from the low-margin netbooks that have dominated its PC lineup in the past. Following the success of Acer&#8217;s first-generation ultrabook — the Aspire S3 reportedly shipped between 250,000 and 300,000 units during its first quarter of availability — Acer plans to launch new ultrabook models in both the second and third quarters this year. According to DigiTimes, Wang estimates that Windows and Intel-powered ultrabooks will account for between 25% and 35% of the company&#8217;s PC sales in 2012. Wang expects notebook shipment volume to slide between 10% and 15% sequentially in the first quarter, however he expects full-year shipments to grow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/acer-chairman-eyes-macbook-air-like-ultrabooks-for-pc-growth"><img class="size-full wp-image-123156 aligncenter" title="AspireS3_15-ultrabook" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AspireS3_15-ultrabook.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="379" /></a></center>
<p>Acer chairman JT Wang on Thursday reaffirmed the company&#8217;s dedication to the new &#8220;ultrabook&#8221; market, further distancing his company from the low-margin netbooks that have dominated its PC lineup in the past. Following the success of Acer&#8217;s first-generation ultrabook — the Aspire S3 reportedly shipped between 250,000 and 300,000 units during its first quarter of availability — Acer plans to launch <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/21/acers-699-15-inch-ultrabook-could-undercut-rumored-15-inch-macbook-air/">new ultrabook models</a> in both the second and third quarters this year. According to <em>DigiTimes</em>, Wang estimates that Windows and Intel-powered ultrabooks will account for between 25% and 35% of the company&#8217;s PC sales in 2012. Wang expects notebook shipment volume to slide between 10% and 15% sequentially in the first quarter, however he expects full-year shipments to grow 10% compared to 2011. While sales in the U.S. and Europe are likely to remain relatively slow according to Acer, the company projects strong sales in Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand and other Southeast Asia markets.<span id="more-123155"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120118PD215.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/acer-chairman-eyes-macbook-air-like-ultrabooks-for-pc-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AspireS3_15-ultrabook-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-12 05:59:57 -->
