<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola MB865 could be Atrix 2, AT&amp;T&#8217;s first 4G LTE phone</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/01/motorola-mb865-could-be-atrix-2-atts-first-4g-lte-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/01/motorola-mb865-could-be-atrix-2-atts-first-4g-lte-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATRIX 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATRIX 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=98565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we saw the first images of a new Motorola handset largely believed to be the successor to the ATRIX 4G. Now rumors have surfaced that the phone&#8217;s model number is actually &#8220;MB865&#8243; and that it packs a 4G LTE radio, which lends credence to the possibility of it launching as AT&#38;T&#8217;s first 4G LTE smartphone. According to PhoneArena, which purportedly obtained a leaked internal system screenshot from AT&#38;T, the MB865 will be field tested in a number of markets where AT&#38;T has already confirmed it will deploy its new 4G network. The phone also said to sport an 8-megapixel camera capable of recording 1080p video and is equipped with an HD display and a dual-core processor. AT&#38;T has]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/01/motorola-mb865-could-be-atrix-2-atts-first-4g-lte-phone"><img class="size-full wp-image-98196 aligncenter" title="ATT-new-Motorola-Atrix-Android" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ATT-new-Motorola-Atrix-Android110728132047.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="450" /></a></center>
<p>Last week we saw the first images of a <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/28/new-att-motorola-atrix-spotted-with-8-megapixel-camera/">new Motorola handset</a> largely believed to be the successor to the ATRIX 4G. Now rumors have surfaced that the phone&#8217;s model number is actually &#8220;MB865&#8243; and that it packs a 4G LTE radio, which lends credence to the possibility of it launching as AT&amp;T&#8217;s first 4G LTE smartphone. According to <em>PhoneArena</em>, which purportedly obtained a leaked internal system screenshot from AT&amp;T, the MB865 will be field tested in a number of markets where AT&amp;T has already confirmed it will deploy its new 4G network. The phone also said to sport an 8-megapixel camera capable of recording 1080p video and is equipped with an HD display and a dual-core processor. AT&amp;T has confirmed that it will launch 4G LTE service in several markets this summer including Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio. The carrier expects its faster network to be available in a total of 15 markets by the end of this year and has already <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/13/att-announces-first-two-4g-lte-devices/">announced two devices</a>. AT&amp;T may hold off on launching the MB865, or what is now being called the ATRIX 2, until its LTE network is available in more areas, so it is unclear when we will see the phone become official. <span id="more-98565"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/Motorola-MB865-leaks-again-from-the-AT-T-system-complete-with-an-LTE-tracking-code_id20798">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/01/motorola-mb865-could-be-atrix-2-atts-first-4g-lte-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ATT-new-Motorola-Atrix-Android110728132047-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Army testing smartphones and tablets for combat</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/18/army-testing-smartphones-and-tablets-for-combat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/18/army-testing-smartphones-and-tablets-for-combat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overseas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=96969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Army has started a pilot program on June 6th to test the effectiveness of equipping troops with tablets and phones in combat, CNN recently reported. The idea is to provide troops with the ability to send text messages and geotagged images that alert others about their current surroundings. Similarly, the infantry could use the devices to file regular reports and easily view maps, CNN said. So far, the troops have been testing the iPhone and phones powered by Windows Phone and Android, and soldiers have particularly liked the iPhone and Android-powered devices. In addition to smartphones, the Army is also testing the iPad and tablets from Dell and HP. The results of the tests have been so positive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/18/army-testing-smartphones-and-tablets-for-combat"><img class="size-full wp-image-96975 aligncenter" title="Flickr_-_The_U.S._Army_-_Official_Army_iPhone_app" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Flickr_-_The_U.S._Army_-_Official_Army_iPhone_app110718140923.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="310" /></a></center>
<p>The U.S. Army has started a pilot program on June 6th to test the effectiveness of equipping troops with tablets and phones in combat, <em>CNN </em>recently reported. The idea is to provide troops with the ability to send text messages and geotagged images that alert others about their current surroundings. Similarly, the infantry could use the devices to file regular reports and easily view maps, <em>CNN </em>said. So far, the troops have been testing the iPhone and phones powered by Windows Phone and Android, and soldiers have particularly liked the iPhone and Android-powered devices. In addition to smartphones, the Army is also testing the iPad and tablets from Dell and HP. The results of the tests have been so positive that the Army could begin deploying a small amount of troops equipped with smartphones later this year. &#8220;Today, we don&#8217;t have the level of encryption that we would need to take [a smartphone] overseas and fully integrate it into our mission-command  systems,&#8221; said Ed Mazzanti, an Army director working on the program. &#8220;There could be some limited deployments  even this year, tied to tactical radios that supply the encryption  that&#8217;s needed.&#8221;<span id="more-96969"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/07/12/army.smartphones/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/18/army-testing-smartphones-and-tablets-for-combat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Flickr_-_The_U.S._Army_-_Official_Army_iPhone_app110718140923-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T shows off its LTE chops; 28Mbps in lab setting</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/20/at-28mbps-in-lab-setting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/20/at-28mbps-in-lab-setting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carriers - US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throughput]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=90150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T&#8217;s &#8220;4G&#8221; message may be a bit convoluted when its Long Term Evolution (LTE) network begins to bear fruit. The company has already branded its HSPA network as &#8220;4G&#8221;, although the coverage and real world speeds are less than impressive — especially when compared to other HSPA+ networks, like that of T-Mobile. But that hasn&#8217;t stopped the nation&#8217;s second largest carrier from working on a second 4G network and, thankfully, this one seems to be bringing the downlink goods. Recently, blog GigaOM was treated to a tour of AT&#38;T&#8217;s Foundry laboratory in Texas. The site reports seeing &#8220;real world speeds&#8221; of 28.87Mbps on the downlink and 10.4Mbps on the uplink. Much better than the paltry 5Mbps down and 1Mbps up being pumped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/20/at-28mbps-in-lab-setting"><img class="size-full wp-image-86093 aligncenter" title="att-sign" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/att-sign110420122937.jpeg" alt="" width="645" height="347" /></a></center>
<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s &#8220;4G&#8221; message may be a bit convoluted when its Long Term Evolution (LTE) network begins to bear fruit. The company has already branded its HSPA network as &#8220;4G&#8221;, although the coverage and real world speeds are less than impressive — especially when compared to other HSPA+ networks, like that of T-Mobile. But that hasn&#8217;t stopped the nation&#8217;s second largest carrier from working on a second 4G network and, thankfully, this one seems to be bringing the downlink goods. Recently, blog <em>GigaOM</em> was treated to a tour of AT&amp;T&#8217;s Foundry laboratory in Texas. The site reports seeing &#8220;real world speeds&#8221; of 28.87Mbps on the downlink and 10.4Mbps on the uplink. Much better than the paltry 5Mbps down and 1Mbps up being pumped out by the company&#8217;s current 4G, HSPA network. AT&amp;T plans to launch its LTE network in several markets by the end of this year and hopefully&#8230; these speeds hold up.<span id="more-90150"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/broadband/a-first-look-at-atts-lte-network/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/20/at-28mbps-in-lab-setting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/att-sign110420122937-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Cellular to launch LTE network &#8216;in time for holidays&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/06/u-s-cellular-to-launch-lte-network-in-time-for-holidays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/06/u-s-cellular-to-launch-lte-network-in-time-for-holidays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 03:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carriers - US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Cellular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=88392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regional wireless provider U.S. Cellular has officially thrown its hat into the 4G ring. &#8220;U.S. Cellular, in conjunction with its partnership with King Street Wireless, announced today that it will deliver high-speed 4G LTE services and 4G-enabled devices to more than 25 percent of its customers across two dozen markets in time for the holiday season,&#8221; declares the company&#8217;s press release. U.S. Cellular plans to have LTE-enabled devices in market &#8220;during the first phase of its 4G LTE rollout&#8221; with additional devices populating the carrier&#8217;s lineup in 2012. Milwaukee, Madison and Racine, Wisconsin; Des Moines, Cedar Rapids and Davenport, Iowa; Portland and Bangor, Maine; and Greenville, North Carolina will be among the first markets to be covered by the new, high-speed network. The]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/06/u-s-cellular-to-launch-lte-network-in-time-for-holidays"><img class="size-full wp-image-68625 aligncenter" title="US Cellular Logo" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/US-Cellular-Logo-Feb-09.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="164" /></a></center>
<p>Regional wireless provider U.S. Cellular has officially thrown its hat into the 4G ring. &#8220;U.S. Cellular, in conjunction with its partnership with King Street Wireless, announced today that it will deliver high-speed 4G LTE services and 4G-enabled devices to more than 25 percent of its customers across two dozen markets in time for the holiday season,&#8221; declares the company&#8217;s press release. U.S. Cellular plans to have LTE-enabled devices in market &#8220;during the first phase of its 4G LTE rollout&#8221; with additional devices populating the carrier&#8217;s lineup in 2012. Milwaukee, Madison and Racine, Wisconsin; Des Moines, Cedar Rapids and Davenport, Iowa; Portland and Bangor, Maine; and Greenville, North Carolina will be among the first markets to be covered by the new, high-speed network. The full press release is after the break.<span id="more-88392"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>U.S. CELLULAR TO LAUNCH 4G LTE SERVICE AND DEVICES </strong><strong>IN TIME FOR THE HOLIDAYS</strong></p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO (May 6, 2011) –</strong> U.S. Cellular (NYSE: USM), in conjunction with its partnership with King Street Wireless, announced today that it will deliver high-speed 4G LTE services and 4G-enabled devices to more than 25 percent of its customers across two dozen markets in time for the holiday season. U.S. Cellular customers with 4G LTE devices and service will experience significantly faster data speeds when browsing the web, accessing e-mail, playing games and viewing and streaming videos.</p>
<p>The initial rollout of 4G LTE service for U.S. Cellular, which has the highest call quality and network satisfaction of any national carrier, is planned for selected cities in Iowa, Wisconsin, Maine, North Carolina, Texas and Oklahoma. These include some of U.S. Cellular’s leading markets such as Milwaukee, Madison and Racine, Wis.; Des Moines, Cedar Rapids and Davenport, Iowa; Portland and Bangor, Maine; and Greenville, N.C.</p>
<p>“With 4G LTE, our customers will have faster connections to the people, information and entertainment that enhance their lives and help them stay organized,” said Mary N. Dillon, president and CEO of U.S. Cellular. “In addition to our line-up of cutting-edge devices, customers who switch to U.S. Cellular get unique benefits like faster phone upgrades without continuously signing contracts, and join the happiest customers in wireless.”</p>
<p>U.S. Cellular plans to introduce a portfolio of 4G-enabled devices during the first phase of its 4G LTE deployment and will continue to expand its offering through 2012. The rollout builds on the 3G data services that U.S. Cellular customers already enjoy on the carrier’s high-quality nationwide network. More details on the next phases of the company’s 4G LTE deployment will be announced at a later date.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/06/u-s-cellular-to-launch-lte-network-in-time-for-holidays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/US-Cellular-Logo-Feb-09-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>White iPhone 4 not thicker than black version according to Apple SVP and Consumer Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/02/white-iphone-4-not-thicker-than-black-version-according-to-apple-svp-and-consumer-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/02/white-iphone-4-not-thicker-than-black-version-according-to-apple-svp-and-consumer-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White iPhone 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=87671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the release of Apple&#8217;s white iPhone 4 last week, preliminary reports suggested that a slightly thicker case was among the differences between the new white model and the older black iPhone 4 model. According to Apple&#8217;s SVP of Product Marketing and to Consumer Reports, however, the white model should be the same thickness as the black version. On Sunday, Apple&#8217;s Phil Schiller was quoted by Apple enthusiast blog 9to5 Mac as saying &#8220;[The white iPhone 4] is not thicker, don’t believe all the junk that you read,&#8221; in a private response to an inquiry on Twitter. Then on Monday, Consumer Reports took a set of calipers to both the white and black iPhone 4 models and found them to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/02/white-iphone-4-not-thicker-than-black-version-according-to-apple-svp-and-consumer-reports"><img class="size-full wp-image-87672 aligncenter" title="white-iphone-4-not-thicker" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/white-iphone-4-not-thicker110502152453.jpeg" alt="" width="598" height="436" /></a></center>
<p>Following the release of <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/27/white-apple-iphone-4-hands-on/">Apple&#8217;s white iPhone 4</a> last week, preliminary reports suggested that a slightly thicker case was among the differences between the new white model and the older black iPhone 4 model. According to Apple&#8217;s SVP of Product Marketing and to Consumer Reports, however, the white model <em>should</em> be the same thickness as the black version. On Sunday, Apple&#8217;s Phil Schiller was quoted by Apple enthusiast blog <em>9to5 Mac</em> as saying &#8220;[The white iPhone 4] is not thicker, don’t believe all the junk that you read,&#8221; in a private response to an inquiry on Twitter. Then on Monday, <em>Consumer Reports</em> took a set of calipers to both the white and black iPhone 4 models and found them to be the exact same thickness: 0.37 inches. Of course we&#8217;ve all seen images of a white iPhone 4 lined up next to a black model and the difference in thickness is quite apparent — we&#8217;ve even verified that one of our own white iPhone 4 models is thicker than its black counterpart. According to Schiller and these new measurements taken by <em>Consumer Reports</em>, however, it looks like we can chalk up the differences to Apple&#8217;s increasingly poor quality control rather than an amended design.<span id="more-87671"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/05/apples-white-iphone-is-not-thicker-than-black-version.html">Read</a> [Consumer Reports] <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/64682/phil-schiller-white-iphone-isnt-thicker-dont-believe-all-the-junk-that-you-read/">Read</a> [9to5 Mac]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/02/white-iphone-4-not-thicker-than-black-version-according-to-apple-svp-and-consumer-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/white-iphone-4-not-thicker110502152453-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon allows Android application &#8216;test drives&#8217; via virtual machine</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/28/amazon-allows-android-application-test-drives-via-virtual-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/28/amazon-allows-android-application-test-drives-via-virtual-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=82855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting way to add value to your mobile application store, free test drives! An overlooked feature of Amazon&#8217;s new Android app store provides users with the ability to try both free and paid applications before making their purchase. Being referred to as &#8220;Test Drive,&#8221; the company is utilizing an Android virtual machine to allow users to preview applications, in the desktop browser, before purchasing on their mobile. While a VM can&#8217;t give you the complete experience, it definitely can aid in weeding out those applications that are duds. The online retailer boasts that it has &#8220;hundreds of apps to Test Drive,&#8221; with more on the way. [Via Engadget] Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/28/amazon-allows-android-application-test-drives-via-virtual-machine"><img class="size-full wp-image-82858 aligncenter" title="Amazon Android Application Test Drive" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-28-at-8.07.31-AM110328120832.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="455" /></a></center>
<p style="text-align: left;">Here&#8217;s an interesting way to add value to your mobile application store, free test drives! An overlooked feature of Amazon&#8217;s new Android app store provides users with the ability to try both free and paid applications before making their purchase. Being referred to as &#8220;Test Drive,&#8221; the company is utilizing an Android virtual machine to allow users to preview applications, in the desktop browser, before purchasing on their mobile. While a VM can&#8217;t give you the complete experience, it definitely can aid in weeding out those applications that are <em>duds</em>. The online retailer boasts that it has &#8220;hundreds of apps to Test Drive,&#8221; with more on the way.<span id="more-82855"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/27/amazon-com-lets-you-play-with-an-android-virtual-machine-try-ap/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=amb_link_355622142_4?ie=UTF8&amp;docId=1000667581&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=right-3&amp;pf_rd_r=1KGBQEC0TMPGDA0GJN1B&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=1292013542&amp;pf_rd_i=2350149011">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/28/amazon-allows-android-application-test-drives-via-virtual-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-28-at-8.07.31-AM110328120832-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple calls foul on web browser speed test</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/17/apple-calls-foul-on-web-browser-speed-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/17/apple-calls-foul-on-web-browser-speed-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=81161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, we told you about a study conducted by Blaze Software comparing the native browser speeds in Apple&#8217;s iOS and Google&#8217;s Android. The results of over 45,000 tests were published, and the firm concluded that Android was roughly 52% faster than iOS in terms of browser performance. Not so fast, says Apple. In a statement to blog The Loop, an Apple spokesperson pointed out a perceived flaw in Blaze Software&#8217;s methodology. “Their testing is flawed because they didn’t actually test the Safari web browser on the iPhone,” wrote Apple&#8217;s spokesperson. “Instead they only tested their own proprietary app which uses an embedded web viewer that doesn’t take advantage of Safari’s web performance optimizations. Despite this fundamental testing flaw, they still only found an]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/17/apple-calls-foul-on-web-browser-speed-test"><img class="size-full wp-image-81164 aligncenter" title="iPhone Safari" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/iPhone-Safari110317195348.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Earlier today, we told you about a <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/17/45000-tests-prove-android-surfs-faster-than-the-iphone/">study</a> conducted by Blaze Software comparing the native browser speeds in Apple&#8217;s iOS and Google&#8217;s Android. The results of over 45,000 tests were published, and the firm concluded that Android was roughly 52% faster than iOS in terms of browser performance. Not so fast, says Apple. In a statement to blog <em>The Loop</em>, an Apple spokesperson pointed out a perceived flaw in Blaze Software&#8217;s methodology. “Their testing is flawed because they didn’t actually test the Safari web browser on the iPhone,” wrote Apple&#8217;s spokesperson. “Instead they only tested their own proprietary app which uses an embedded web viewer that doesn’t take advantage of Safari’s web performance optimizations. Despite this fundamental testing flaw, they still only found an average of a second difference in loading web pages.” The UIWebView framework, which was used to run Blaze&#8217;s &#8220;proprietary app&#8221; in an &#8220;embedded web viewer,&#8221; does not leverage Apple&#8217;s Nitro JavaScript engine — the part of mobile Safari that Apple claims is nearly 2x faster than its predecessor. Tests that leverage the enhanced JavaScript engine would, according to Apple, have improved Safari&#8217;s performance. Blaze Software has yet to publicly comment on Apple&#8217;s rebuttal.<span id="more-81161"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2011/03/17/study-comparing-android-to-iphone-web-browsing-speed-flawed/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/17/apple-calls-foul-on-web-browser-speed-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/iPhone-Safari110317195348-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC World: T-Mobile&#8217;s 4G network wins smartphone speed test</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/14/pc-world-t-mobiles-4g-network-wins-smartphone-speed-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/14/pc-world-t-mobiles-4g-network-wins-smartphone-speed-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carriers - US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tmobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=80265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World has published a report that compares the 4G data speeds of both smartphones and laptop modems. As we&#8217;ve said in the past, we realize that you&#8217;re an AT&#38;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon Wireless customer because that particular carrier provides the services you want, need, and/or like in your area at a price you can afford. Nonetheless, hit the jump to see who was declared the winner! PC World conducted tests in 13 U.S. cities including Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Denver, New Orleans, New York, Orlando, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle during the first six weeks of 2011. The site performed 177,000 timed tests in 260 different testing locations — including both suburban and urban environments. If]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-80281" href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/14/pc-world-t-mobiles-4g-network-wins-smartphone-speed-test/4g_speed_test_chart1x-5152347/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-80281" title="4g_speed_test_chart1x-5152347" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/4g_speed_test_chart1x-5152347110314211927.jpg" alt="" width="606" height="302" /></a><em>PC World</em> has published a report that compares the 4G data speeds of both smartphones and laptop modems. As <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/02/23/pc-world-att-download-speeds-67-faster-than-its-competitors/">we&#8217;ve said in the past</a>, we realize that you&#8217;re an AT&amp;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon Wireless customer because that particular carrier provides the services you want, need, and/or like in your area at a price you can afford. Nonetheless, hit the jump to see who was declared the winner!<span id="more-80265"></span></p>
<p><em>PC World</em> conducted tests in 13 U.S. cities including Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Denver, New Orleans, New York, Orlando, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle during the first six weeks of 2011. The site performed 177,000 timed tests in 260 different testing locations — including both suburban and urban environments. If <em>PC World</em> and its testing partner, Novarum, were unable to find a 3G signal, the firms used the 3G network of a roaming partner.</p>
<p>The test results found the following speed averages for its laptop modem tests:</p>
<ul>
<li>AT&amp;T: average download speed 2.48Mbps, average upload speed 1.05Mbps</li>
<li>Sprint: average download speed 2.15Mbps, average upload speed 0.61Mbps</li>
<li>T-Mobile: average download speed 2.83Mbps, average upload speed 0.85Mbps</li>
<li>Verizon Wireless: average download speed 6.44Mbps, average upload speed 5.00Mbps.</li>
</ul>
<p>In that case, Verizon Wireless — and LTE — was the clear winner. But the smartphone 4G tests painted a different picture:</p>
<ul>
<li>AT&amp;T: average download speed 1.45Mbps, average upload speed 0.97Mbps</li>
<li>Sprint: average download speed 1.50Mbps, average upload speed 0.56Mbps</li>
<li>T-Mobile: average download speed 2.28 Mbps, average upload speed 0.95 Mbps</li>
<li>Verizon Wireless: average download speed 1.01 Mbps, average upload speed 0.67 Mbps.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the smartphone tests, T-Mobile came out on top with the fastest downlink data-speeds available. If you&#8217;re interested to know how the laptop modems and smartphones performed in a market near you, head over to <em>PC World</em> for an in-depth look at its test results.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/221931/4g_wireless_speed_tests_which_is_really_the_fastest.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/14/pc-world-t-mobiles-4g-network-wins-smartphone-speed-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/4g_speed_test_chart1x-5152347110314211927-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola ATRIX 4G vs. LG Optimus 2X: Not all dual-cores are created equal</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/motorola-atrix-4g-vs-lg-optimus-2x-not-all-dual-cores-are-created-equal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/motorola-atrix-4g-vs-lg-optimus-2x-not-all-dual-cores-are-created-equal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 2.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATRIX 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Froyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG Optimus 2X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola ATRIX 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimus 2X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tegra 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=79042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android enthusiast blog Android and Me oversaw a benchmark battle royale on Friday. While the goal of the exercise was to pit the ATRIX 4G against the LG Optimus 2X to see which phone makes better use of its dual-core Tegra 2 processor, the overall results help emphasize something we constantly stress here on BGR: specs are only half the story. The blog arranged a benchmark battle between the ATRIX 4G and Optimus 2X along with Google&#8217;s Nexus S and Nexus One, HTC&#8217;s G2 and Motorola&#8217;s DROID, and the results are hardly what you might expect. First things first — LG&#8217;s Optimus 2X handily topped the list in six of eight tests performed, bested only by the ATRIX in the Smartbench 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/?p=79042"><img class="size-full wp-image-79043 aligncenter" title="artix-vs-optimus-2x" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/artix-vs-optimus-2x110304185439.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="490" /></a></center>
<p>Android enthusiast blog <em>Android and Me</em> oversaw a benchmark battle royale on Friday. While the goal of the exercise was to pit the ATRIX 4G against the LG Optimus 2X to see which phone makes better use of its dual-core Tegra 2 processor, the overall results help emphasize something we constantly stress here on BGR: specs are only half the story. The blog arranged a benchmark battle between the ATRIX 4G and Optimus 2X along with Google&#8217;s Nexus S and Nexus One, HTC&#8217;s G2 and Motorola&#8217;s DROID, and the results are hardly what you might expect. First things first — LG&#8217;s Optimus 2X handily topped the list in six of eight tests performed, bested only by the ATRIX in the Smartbench 2011 productivity test and the Linpack test. The 800MHz-packing G2 outdid several 1GHz offerings in numerous tests, however, which may come a s surprise to many. Hit the break for a few sets of benchmark results mapped out on graphs, then hit the read link to check out the rest.<span id="more-79042"></span></p>
<center><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-79055" title="benchmark-lineup-b" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/benchmark-lineup-b110304193458.jpeg" alt="" width="630" height="181" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-79046 aligncenter" title="tegra-2-neocore-new" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/tegra-2-neocore-new110304185853.jpeg" alt="" width="559" height="299" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-79045 aligncenter" title="tegra-2-nenamark1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/tegra-2-nenamark1110304185851.jpeg" alt="" width="544" height="289" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-79047 aligncenter" title="tegra-2-smartbench-games" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/tegra-2-smartbench-games110304185856.jpeg" alt="" width="544" height="299" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-79044 aligncenter" title="tegra-2-egypt" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/tegra-2-egypt110304185836.jpeg" alt="" width="532" height="310" /></center>
<p><a href="http://androidandme.com/2011/03/news/tegra-2-benchmarks-motorola-atrix-4g-vs-lg-optimus-2x/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/04/motorola-atrix-4g-vs-lg-optimus-2x-not-all-dual-cores-are-created-equal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/artix-vs-optimus-2x110304185439-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xperia Play PlayStation phone gets extensive preview; videos, benchmarks, more</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/07/xperia-play-playstation-phone-gets-extensive-preview-videos-benchmarks-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/07/xperia-play-playstation-phone-gets-extensive-preview-videos-benchmarks-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 2.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gingerbread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayStation Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSP Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xperia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xperia Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=72090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson might not be ready to unveil the highly anticipated Xperia Play at this year&#8217;s Consumer Electronics Show, but the world is most definitely ready to see this little guy get official. Perhaps in an effort to appease the masses of anxious mobile gamers waiting impatiently to get their mits on the upcoming PlayStation-branded Gingerbread phone, Chinese enthusiast blog IT168 has issued an extensive preview of the device. And when we say extensive, we mean it. Details found within the preview include confirmation of a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, a Qualcomm Adreno 205 graphics processor, a 4-inch 854 x 480-pixel display, an 8-megapixel rear camera with LED flash, a 1,500 mAh battery, microSDHC support and 512 MB each of RAM and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/?p=72090"><img class="size-full wp-image-72091 aligncenter" title="play1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play1.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></center>
<p>Sony Ericsson might not be ready to unveil the highly anticipated Xperia Play at this year&#8217;s Consumer Electronics Show, but the world is most definitely ready to see this little guy get official. Perhaps in an effort to appease the masses of anxious mobile gamers waiting impatiently to get their mits on the upcoming PlayStation-branded Gingerbread phone, Chinese enthusiast blog <em>IT168</em> has issued an extensive preview of the device. And when we say extensive, we mean it. Details found within the preview include confirmation of a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, a Qualcomm Adreno 205 graphics processor, a 4-inch 854 x 480-pixel display, an 8-megapixel rear camera with LED flash, a 1,500 mAh battery, microSDHC support and 512 MB each of RAM and ROM. The blog also ran some benchmark tests and, well, the results were pretty impressive — the forthcoming Xperia phone scored 1,733 in Quadrant. Hit the jump for some solid Xperia porn and then hit the read link for a gigantic, poorly translated preview.<span id="more-72090"></span></p>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72092 aligncenter" title="play2" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play2.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72092 aligncenter" title="play3" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play3.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72092 aligncenter" title="play4" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play4.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72092 aligncenter" title="play5" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play5.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72096 aligncenter" title="play6" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play6.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<center><img class="size-full wp-image-72092 aligncenter" title="play7" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play7.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></center>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://mobile.it168.com/a2011/0106/1147/000001147269.shtml">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/07/xperia-play-playstation-phone-gets-extensive-preview-videos-benchmarks-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/play1-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIM pits Playbook against iPad in browser showdown video</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/16/rim-pits-playbook-against-ipad-in-browser-showdown-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/16/rim-pits-playbook-against-ipad-in-browser-showdown-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S. Geller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acid 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=66896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIM just let us know that they have put together a three minute video pitting the unreleased and unfinished Playbook tablet against Apple&#8217;s iPad. The Canadian tech giant boasts of its device&#8217;s superior web-page rendering speed, super Flash performance, a perfect score on the Acid 3 browser test with no rendering artifacts, and JavaScript fluidity. But hey, don&#8217;t listen to us break it out, check out the full video after the break and let us know what you think. Our quick feedback? It&#8217;s mighty impressive. Though we have to wonder, by the time the Playbook is released, there will most likely be an iPad 2 out, and we know Apple isn&#8217;t just going to sit still. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><img class="size-full wp-image-66900 aligncenter" title="Playbook v iPad Video" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Screen-shot-2010-11-16-at-9.37.00-AM.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="358" /></center>
<p>RIM just let us know that they have put together a three minute video pitting the unreleased and unfinished Playbook tablet against Apple&#8217;s iPad. The Canadian tech giant boasts of its device&#8217;s superior web-page rendering speed, super Flash performance, a perfect score on the Acid 3 browser test with no rendering artifacts, and JavaScript fluidity. But hey, don&#8217;t listen to us break it out, check out the full video after the break and let us know what you think. Our quick feedback? It&#8217;s mighty impressive. Though we have to wonder, by the time the Playbook is released, there will most likely be an iPad 2 out, and we know Apple isn&#8217;t just going to sit still.</p>
<center><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s72rGDUn2uo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s72rGDUn2uo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s72rGDUn2uo&amp;feature=player_embedded">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/16/rim-pits-playbook-against-ipad-in-browser-showdown-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Screen-shot-2010-11-16-at-9.37.00-AM-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Air benchmarks: stock vs. built-to-order</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/macbook-air-benchmarks-stock-vs-built-to-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/macbook-air-benchmarks-stock-vs-built-to-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S. Geller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekbench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=66258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since Apple announced the new MacBook Air &#8212; and we found out there was a built-to-order option which upped not only the RAM but CPU &#8212; we figured it would be worth putting it head to head with the stock model to see performance differences. We have a 13-inch MacBook Air &#8220;stock&#8221; model with a 1.86GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD drive. Our built to order MacBook Air is rocking a 2.13GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD drive. Hit the jump to check out our results. For our benchmarking tests, we used Geekbench and Cinebench. Here are the results: According to Geekbench, the built to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><img title="MBA-BTO" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/MBA-BTO.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="439" /></center>
<p>Ever since Apple announced the new MacBook Air &#8212; and we found out there was a built-to-order option which upped not only the RAM but CPU &#8212; we figured it would be worth putting it head to head with the stock model to see performance differences. We have a 13-inch MacBook Air &#8220;stock&#8221; model with a 1.86GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD drive. Our built to order MacBook Air is rocking a 2.13GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD drive. Hit the jump to check out our results.<span id="more-66258"></span></p>
<p>For our benchmarking tests, we used <em>Geekbench</em> and <em>Cinebench</em>. Here are the results:</p>
<p>According to Geekbench, the built to order MacBook Air came in with a score of 3314, and the stock MacBook Air came in at 2976. That&#8217;s around an 11% difference in performance.</p>
<center><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-66272" title="MBA-stock" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/MBA-stock.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="421" /></center>
<p>When we ran Cinebech on the built-to-order MacBook Air, we got a score of 1.19. On the stock MacBook Air we got 1.04. A performance difference of around 14%. Is the extra price worth the extra performance?</p>
<center><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-66270" title="Cinebench" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Cinebench.jpg" alt="" width="533" height="613" /></center>
<p>Well, you&#8217;ll have to spend 27% more than the base stock-model to get the faster CPU and additional RAM &#8212; part of the reason being you get a SSD that&#8217;s twice the capacity &#8212; but still, that seems a tad expensive. We will update this post with real world usage feedback over the next couple days to see if we&#8217;re missing something, but for now, if you don&#8217;t need the additional storage space, we&#8217;d say just upgrade the RAM and you&#8217;ll most likely be a happy camper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/macbook-air-benchmarks-stock-vs-built-to-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Cinebench-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New tech lets you pee on your phone to check for an STD</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/new-tech-lets-you-pee-on-your-phone-to-check-for-an-std/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/new-tech-lets-you-pee-on-your-phone-to-check-for-an-std/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=66227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much fun as it is to head to your doctor&#8217;s office or a clinic to get tested for an STD, it looks like there might be a slightly more private and comfortable option on the horizon. A group of organizations in the UK have combined to produce over $10 million in funding for research related to inexpensive portable STD test. The test consists of a single-use USB dongle-sized component containing a microchip. Once urinated upon, the device connects to a mobile phone or laptop and tests for herpes, chlamydia and gonorrhea with instant results. The tests would be distributed through vending machines in UK nightclubs, among other places, and would cost less than $2 each. It is almost a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/05/new-test-mobile-phones-diagnose-stds"><img class="size-full wp-image-66228 aligncenter" title="std-test" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/std-test.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></center>
<p>As much fun as it is to head to your doctor&#8217;s office or a clinic to get tested for an STD, it looks like there might be a slightly more private and comfortable option on the horizon. A group of organizations in the UK have combined to produce over $10 million in funding for research related to inexpensive portable STD test. The test consists of a single-use USB dongle-sized component containing a microchip. Once urinated upon, the device connects to a mobile phone or laptop and tests for herpes, chlamydia and gonorrhea with instant results. The tests would be distributed through vending machines in UK nightclubs, among other places, and would cost less than $2 each. It is almost a given that more private testing options will lead to more frequent testing and, hopefully, to safer behavior. Let&#8217;s just hope that once this great new mobile STD testing technology hits the market in the UK, it spreads quickly.<span id="more-66227"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/05/new-test-mobile-phones-diagnose-stds">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/11/09/new-tech-lets-you-pee-on-your-phone-to-check-for-an-std/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/std-test-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon makes $15 data plan official, testing unlimited mobile-to-mobile in some markets</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/29/verizon-makes-15-data-plan-official-testing-unlimited-mobile-to-mobile-in-some-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/29/verizon-makes-15-data-plan-official-testing-unlimited-mobile-to-mobile-in-some-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Munchbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[150]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile to Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unlimited]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=64302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been rumors floating around the internet about Verizon Wireless offering a second, &#8220;tiered&#8221; data plan, and that rumor was confirmed today. America&#8217;s largest wireless provider will begin offering a $15 monthly data plan to 3G smartphone users that offers 150MB data allowance. The carrier will bill overages at $15 per 150MB and the $30, unlimited data plan will remain unchanged. Also hot off the rumor wagon, Engadget is reporting that Verizon is testing calling plans with unlimited, any-mobile-to-mobile minutes &#8212; a la Sprint &#8212; in select markets across Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas. The plans range from $60 all the way up to $130 &#8212; offering between 450 and 2000 minutes &#8212; and include unlimited text]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/29/verizon-makes-15-data-plan-official-testing-unlimited-mobile-to-mobile-in-some-markets/"><img class="size-full wp-image-64304 aligncenter" title="VZW $15 Data Package" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Screen-shot-2010-10-29-at-7.06.24-AM1.jpg" alt="" width="576" height="229" /></a></center>
<p style="text-align: left;">There have been rumors floating around the internet about Verizon Wireless offering a second, &#8220;tiered&#8221; data plan, and that rumor was confirmed today. America&#8217;s largest wireless provider will begin offering a $15 monthly data plan to 3G smartphone users that offers 150MB data allowance. The carrier will bill overages at $15 per 150MB and the $30, unlimited data plan will remain unchanged.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Also hot off the rumor wagon, Engadget is reporting that Verizon is testing calling plans with unlimited, any-mobile-to-mobile minutes &#8212; a la Sprint &#8212; in select markets across Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas. The plans range from $60 all the way up to $130 &#8212; offering between 450 and 2000 minutes &#8212; and include unlimited text messaging. The unlimited mobile-to-mobile offerings are available until the end of 2010 at which point, we assume, Verizon will either expand or cancel the plans depending on demand.<span id="more-64302"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/splash/plansingleline.jsp">[$15 Data Plan</a>] Read [<a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2010/10/28/verizon-testing-unlimited-mobile-to-mobile-plans-regardless-o/">Unlimited Mobile</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/29/verizon-makes-15-data-plan-official-testing-unlimited-mobile-to-mobile-in-some-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Screen-shot-2010-10-29-at-7.06.24-AM-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New MacBook Air benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/26/new-macbook-air-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/26/new-macbook-air-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Joseph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11.6"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13.3"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=63855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been twiddling your thumbs, contemplating whether or not to get the svelte new MacBook Air? The folks over at Macworld might just have what you&#8217;ve been looking for &#8212; benchmark scores. The website has published benchmark results for all four variants of the new Air and as it turns out, all four outperformed previous generation models. The new 11.6-inch MacBook Air, even with its 1.4GHz processor, managed to outperform the older 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo models thanks to its speedy flash storage. The new 13.3-inch 1.86GHz model even managed to marginally outperform the current 13-inch MacBook Pro. So, if you are still sitting on the fence, check out our hands-on and then hit the read link for detailed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/154596/2010/10/macbookair_benchmarks.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-63187" title="MacBook-Air-1" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/MacBook-Air-1.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="430" /></a></center>
<p>Have you been twiddling your thumbs, contemplating whether or not to get the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/20/apple-unveils-new-macbook-air-models/">svelte new MacBook Air</a>? The folks over at <em>Macworld</em> might just have what you&#8217;ve been looking for &#8212; benchmark scores. The website has published benchmark results for all four variants of the new Air and as it turns out, all four outperformed previous generation models. The new 11.6-inch MacBook Air, even with its 1.4GHz processor, managed to outperform the older 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo models thanks to its speedy flash storage. The new 13.3-inch 1.86GHz model even managed to marginally outperform the current 13-inch MacBook Pro. So, if you are still sitting on the fence, check out our <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/21/macbook-air-11-hands-on-first-impressions/">hands-on</a> and then hit the read link for detailed benchmark results.<span id="more-63855"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/154596/2010/10/macbookair_benchmarks.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2010/10/26/new-macbook-air-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail>http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/MacBook-Air-1-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-02-12 02:34:53 -->
