<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech &#187; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgr.com/tag/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Proview likely to settle dispute over iPad trademark</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/24/apple-and-proview-likely-to-settle-dispute-over-ipad-trademark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/24/apple-and-proview-likely-to-settle-dispute-over-ipad-trademark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=136716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Apple and Proview initiated talks in an attempt to resolve an ongoing legal dispute over the iPad trademark, and the Chinese company is confident that it will receive a settlement offer from Apple, the Associated Press reports. &#8220;It is likely that we will settle out of court. The Guangdong High Court is helping to arrange it and the court also expects to do so,&#8221; said Ma Dongxiao, a lawyer for Proview. &#8220;Actually Proview always expected to settle out of court from the beginning. I don&#8217;t know if Apple has changed its attitude, but I believe that the key point now is the price.&#8221; In a previous statement, Apple claimed it would never &#8220;knowingly abuse someone else&#8217;s trademarks,&#8221; and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/24/apple-and-proview-likely-to-settle-dispute-over-ipad-trademark"><img class="size-full wp-image-61347 aligncenter" title="Apple Store China" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></center>
<p>Last week, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/20/apple-in-settlement-talks-with-proview-over-ipad-trademark-dispute/">Apple and Proview initiated talks</a> in an attempt to resolve <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/">an ongoing legal dispute</a> over the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/">iPad trademark</a>, and the Chinese company is confident that it will receive a settlement offer from Apple, the <em> Associated Press</em> reports. &#8220;It is likely that we will settle out of court. The Guangdong High Court is helping to arrange it and the court also expects to do so,&#8221; said Ma Dongxiao, a lawyer for Proview. &#8220;Actually Proview always expected to settle out of court from the beginning. I don&#8217;t know if Apple has changed its attitude, but I believe that the key point now is the price.&#8221; In a previous statement, Apple claimed it would never &#8220;knowingly abuse someone else&#8217;s trademarks,&#8221; and said that Proview &#8220;still owe a lot of people a lot of money, they are now unfairly trying to get more from Apple for a trademark we already paid for.&#8221; Fu Shuangjian, the Deputy Director of China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce, however, has already stated that Proview is still the legitimate owner of the iPad trademark in the country. If the companies cannot reach a settlement, the Guangdong High Court will rule over the matter.</p>
<p><span id="more-136716"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-court-seeking-mediate-ipad-063819549.html">Read</a>[Associated Press] <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303459004577363551202886044.html">Read</a> [WSJ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/04/24/apple-and-proview-likely-to-settle-dispute-over-ipad-trademark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proview brings iPad trademark battle to U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/24/proview-brings-ipad-trademark-battle-to-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/24/proview-brings-ipad-trademark-battle-to-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview International Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=128421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proview International on February 17th asked a California court to prevent Apple from using the iPad name in the United States, Bloomberg reports. The Chinese company — which Apple claims sold it the rights to the iPad trademark in 10 countries, including China — says Apple subsidiary IP Application Development Ltd. made &#8220;false&#8221; statements to Proview before the sale and is now asking a Superior Court in Santa Clara to nullify the deal. A court in Shanghai on Thursday rejected Proview’s request to block sales of the iPad within the city. The Cupertino-based company released the iPad to China in 2010, and it is now the second-biggest iPad market in terms of revenue for Apple. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/24/proview-brings-ipad-trademark-battle-to-u-s"><img class="size-full wp-image-61347 aligncenter" title="Apple Store China" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></center>
<p>Proview International on February 17th asked a California court to prevent Apple from using the iPad name in the United States, <em>Bloomberg</em> reports. The Chinese company — which Apple claims sold it the rights to the iPad trademark in 10 countries, including China — says Apple subsidiary IP Application Development Ltd. made &#8220;false&#8221; statements to Proview before the sale and is now asking a Superior Court in Santa Clara to nullify the deal. A court in <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/apple-scores-a-win-in-shanghai-court-ipad-sales-to-continue/">Shanghai on Thursday rejected Proview’s request</a> to block sales of the iPad within the city. The Cupertino-based company released the iPad to China in 2010, and it is now the second-biggest iPad market in terms of revenue for Apple.<span id="more-128421"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-24/proview-sues-apple-in-santa-clara-taking-ipad-trademark-fight-to-u-s-.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/24/proview-brings-ipad-trademark-battle-to-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple scores a win in Shanghai court, iPad sales to continue</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/apple-scores-a-win-in-shanghai-court-ipad-sales-to-continue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/apple-scores-a-win-in-shanghai-court-ipad-sales-to-continue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview International Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=128236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Shanghai court has rejected Proview International&#8217;s request to block the sales of Apple&#8217;s iPad, reports Reuters. According to the publication&#8217;s sources, the Pudong New Area People&#8217;s Court in Shangai on Wednesday issued a ruling in Apple&#8217;s favor following a trademark infringement complaints filed in Shanghai. While the decision only covers iPad sales within that city, the victory comes after the Cupertino-based company was handed a string of defeats in smaller courts throughout China. Apple has appealed a December judgement that saw a Shenzhen court rule in favor of Proview, and the hearing is scheduled for February 29th in China&#8217;s southern province of Guangdong. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/apple-scores-a-win-in-shanghai-court-ipad-sales-to-continue"><img class="size-full wp-image-61347 aligncenter" title="Apple Store China" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></center>
<p>A Shanghai court has rejected Proview International&#8217;s request to block the sales of Apple&#8217;s iPad, reports <em>Reuters</em>. According to the publication&#8217;s sources, the Pudong New Area People&#8217;s Court in Shangai on Wednesday issued a ruling in Apple&#8217;s favor following a trademark infringement complaints filed in Shanghai. While the decision only covers iPad sales within that city, the victory comes after the Cupertino-based company <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad/">was handed a string of defeats in smaller courts</a> throughout China. Apple has appealed a December judgement that saw a Shenzhen court rule in favor of Proview, and the hearing is scheduled for February 29th in China&#8217;s southern province of Guangdong.<span id="more-128236"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/23/us-apple-proview-idUSTRE81M0NY20120223?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;dlvrit=56505">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/23/apple-scores-a-win-in-shanghai-court-ipad-sales-to-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple defends rights to iPad name in Shanghai court</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/apple-defends-rights-to-ipad-name-in-shanghai-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/apple-defends-rights-to-ipad-name-in-shanghai-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=128061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple on Wednesday defended itself in a Shanghai court against Proview International, which claims Apple is violating a trademark it holds on the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, the New York Times reported. Proview&#8217;s allegations have prevented the Cupertino-based company from selling its popular tablet in numerous smaller Chinese cities, however Apple Stores in Beijing and Shanghai continue to sell the device. The four-hour session at the Pudong New Area People’s Court ended without any ruling from the district judge, though both sides reportedly presented new evidence in the case. Apple claims it acquired the iPad trademark from Proview in 2009. &#8220;We bought Proview’s worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago,&#8221; the company said in a statement. &#8220;Proview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/apple-defends-rights-to-ipad-name-in-shanghai-court"><img class="size-full wp-image-117999 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-closeup" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ipad-2-closeup.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="489" /></a></center>
<p>Apple on Wednesday defended itself in a Shanghai court against Proview International, which claims Apple is violating a trademark it holds on the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, the <em>New York Times</em> reported. Proview&#8217;s allegations have <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad/">prevented the Cupertino-based company from selling</a> its popular tablet in numerous smaller Chinese cities, however Apple Stores in Beijing and Shanghai continue to sell the device. The four-hour session at the Pudong New Area People’s Court ended without any ruling from the district judge, though both sides reportedly presented new evidence in the case. Apple claims it acquired the iPad trademark from Proview in 2009. &#8220;We bought Proview’s worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago,&#8221; the company said in a statement. &#8220;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China and a Hong Kong court has sided with Apple in this matter. Our case is still pending in mainland China.” Proview claims that Apple is using the iPad name illegally, however, as the subsidiary that licensed the trademark to Apple was not authorized to do so. <span id="more-128061"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/technology/apple-defends-rights-to-ipad-name-in-shanghai-court.html?_r=3&amp;smid=tw-nytimestech&amp;seid=auto">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/22/apple-defends-rights-to-ipad-name-in-shanghai-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-closeup-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-closeup-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese court orders ban on Apple&#8217;s iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview International Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawyer representing Proview International on Monday announced that the Intermediate People&#8217;s Court in Huizhou, a city in southern China, ruled on Friday that distributors should stop selling iPads in China, Associated Press reports. Proview has claimed ownership of the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name in China and it says Apple is violating its trademark. &#8220;We bought Proview&#8217;s worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago. Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China and a Hong Kong court has sided with Apple in this matter,&#8221; Apple spokeswoman Carolyn Wu said earlier in response to the lawsuits. Proview is looking to prevent Apple from importing or exporting the popular tablet in China and may sue the Cupertino-based company for as]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad"><img class="size-full wp-image-123520 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-back" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ipad-2-back.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>A lawyer representing Proview International on Monday announced that the Intermediate People&#8217;s Court in Huizhou, a city in southern China, ruled on Friday that distributors should stop selling iPads in China, <em>Associated Press</em> reports. Proview has claimed ownership of the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name in China and it says Apple is violating its trademark. &#8220;We bought Proview&#8217;s worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago. Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China and a Hong Kong court has sided with Apple in this matter,&#8221; Apple spokeswoman Carolyn Wu said earlier in response to the lawsuits. Proview is looking to prevent Apple from <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/">importing or exporting the popular tablet in China</a> and may sue the Cupertino-based company for as much as <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/17/chinese-firm-may-sue-apple-for-2-billion-in-u-s-over-ipad-name/">$2 billion in the United States</a>. At least <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/">45 iPads had been pulled from store shelves</a> in various Chinese cities last week, however Apple&#8217;s tablets were still being sold at numerous retail locations across the country. <span id="more-127693"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jFxMz-Efitsu3mamhDV40MRJto-Q?docId=0c33d83687f64663b7aa8745c2f160f5">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/20/chinese-court-orders-ban-on-apples-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ipad-back-dark-angle-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ipad-back-dark-angle-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese firm may sue Apple for $2 billion in U.S. over iPad name</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/17/chinese-firm-may-sue-apple-for-2-billion-in-u-s-over-ipad-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/17/chinese-firm-may-sue-apple-for-2-billion-in-u-s-over-ipad-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, the Chinese company that claims to hold the trademark on the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, threatened to sue Apple in the U.S. for $2 billion dollars, reports the AFP. Proview Technology claims it owns the Chinese rights to the iPad name and the company&#8217;s lawyers are looking to prevent Apple from importing or exporting the popular tablet in China. &#8220;Right now we are selecting from three American law firms to sue Apple in the United States for $2 billion in compensation,&#8221; said the chairman of Hejun Vanguard Group, a company working with creditors to restructure Proview. Proview&#8217;s chief executive Yang Rongshan has repeatedly denied allegations that the company is extorting Apple in order to pay off its debt.&#8221;We own [the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/17/chinese-firm-may-sue-apple-for-2-billion-in-u-s-over-ipad-name"><img class="size-full wp-image-123520 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-back" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ipad-2-back.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>On Friday, the Chinese company that claims to hold the trademark on the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, threatened to sue Apple in the U.S. for $2 billion dollars, reports the <em>AFP</em>. Proview Technology claims it owns the Chinese rights to the iPad name and the company&#8217;s lawyers are looking to prevent Apple from <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/">importing or exporting the popular tablet in China</a>. &#8220;Right now we are selecting from three American law firms to sue Apple in the United States for $2 billion in compensation,&#8221; said the chairman of Hejun Vanguard Group, a company working with creditors to restructure Proview. Proview&#8217;s chief executive Yang Rongshan has repeatedly denied allegations that the company is extorting Apple in order to pay off its debt.&#8221;We own [the iPad trademark] in China,&#8221; Rongshan said. &#8220;If you were in my position&#8230; you would try to protect your rights.&#8221; Apple has said that it previously licensed the iPad trademark and Proview is failing to honor its earlier agreement.<span id="more-127495"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jP9u-4_CY7QzMhjglgyW8FDlWTeA?docId=CNG.52b61ef389e499b8e90bf70047a3d10b.361">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/17/chinese-firm-may-sue-apple-for-2-billion-in-u-s-over-ipad-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-back-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-back-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad trademark battle heats up as more Apple tablets seized</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/16/ipad-trademark-battle-heats-up-as-more-apple-tablets-seized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/16/ipad-trademark-battle-heats-up-as-more-apple-tablets-seized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese authorities have seized iPad tablets in at least two more cities as the battle over the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name rages in the East. Officials seized a small number of iPads earlier this week related to a complaint filed by Proview Technology, the China-based owner of the iPad trademark. Proview is seeking to block sales of Apple&#8217;s iPad and to stop the wildly popular tablet from being exported from China. Now, an unknown quantity of iPads has been seized by authorities in Zhengzhou and Qingdao, China according to Reuters, which citing a website belonging to the China Business News newspaper. Proview says it has asked regulators in more than 40 cities across China to investigate Apple&#8217;s alleged trademark violation, while Apple]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/16/ipad-trademark-battle-heats-up-as-more-apple-tablets-seized"><img class="size-full wp-image-115854 aligncenter" title="ipad-smart-cover-12" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ipad-smart-cover-12.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="434" /></a></center>
<p>Chinese authorities have seized iPad tablets in at least two more cities as the battle over the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name rages in the East. <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/">Officials seized a small number of iPads earlier this week</a> related to a complaint filed by Proview Technology, the China-based owner of the iPad trademark. Proview is seeking to <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/">block sales of Apple&#8217;s iPad</a> and to stop the wildly popular tablet from being exported from China. Now, an unknown quantity of iPads has been seized by authorities in Zhengzhou and Qingdao, China according to <em>Reuters</em>, which citing a website belonging to the <em>China Business News</em> newspaper. Proview says it has asked regulators in more than 40 cities across China to investigate Apple&#8217;s alleged trademark violation, while Apple argued earlier that it had reached an agreement to license the iPad name. &#8221;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China,” an Apple spokeswoman said this past Tuesday. &#8220;Our case is still pending in mainland China.”<span id="more-127294"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120216/ap_on_hi_te/as_china_apple_ipad_dispute">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/16/ipad-trademark-battle-heats-up-as-more-apple-tablets-seized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ipad-smart-cover-12-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ipad-smart-cover-12-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s iPad 2 pulled from Amazon China as lawsuit looms</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/apples-ipad-2-pulled-from-amazon-china-as-lawsuit-looms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/apples-ipad-2-pulled-from-amazon-china-as-lawsuit-looms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s class-leading iPad 2 tablet has been pulled from Amazon&#8217;s website in China following a lawsuit filed by Chinese firm Proview International. Proview recently filed suit against Apple for using its trademarked &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, seeking to ban sales of the iPad in China and abroad. Apple contends that it licensed the name from Proview, which has now unlawfully reneged on its deal. &#8221;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China,” and Apple spokesperson said on Tuesday. &#8220;Our case is still pending in mainland China.” While no ruling has been made, Chinese officials reportedly seized a number of Apple tablets earlier this week and now Amazon has pulled the iPad from its website, as has rival Chinese retailer Suning. It is not currently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/apples-ipad-2-pulled-from-amazon-china-as-lawsuit-looms"><img class="size-full wp-image-123520 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-back" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ipad-2-back.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="435" /></a></center>
<p>Apple&#8217;s class-leading iPad 2 tablet has been pulled from Amazon&#8217;s website in China following <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/">a lawsuit filed by Chinese firm Proview International</a>. Proview recently filed suit against Apple for using its trademarked &#8220;iPad&#8221; name, seeking to ban sales of the iPad in China and abroad. Apple contends that it licensed the name from Proview, which has now unlawfully reneged on its deal. &#8221;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China,” and Apple spokesperson said on Tuesday. &#8220;Our case is still pending in mainland China.” While no ruling has been made, Chinese officials reportedly <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/">seized a number of Apple tablets</a> earlier this week and now Amazon has pulled the iPad from its website, as has rival Chinese retailer Suning. It is not currently clear if the sales halts are court-ordered.<span id="more-127124"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/ipad-2-yanked-from-amazon-china-15213580/">SlashGear</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.cn/Apple-%E8%8B%B9%E6%9E%9C-iPad-2-MC979CH-A-9-7%E8%8B%B1%E5%AF%B8%E5%B9%B3%E6%9D%BF%E7%94%B5%E8%84%91-%E7%99%BD%E8%89%B2/dp/B0054SX0P0">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/15/apples-ipad-2-pulled-from-amazon-china-as-lawsuit-looms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-back-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-back-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese firm looks to block iPad sales across the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=127065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, Chinese officials seized 45 iPads in response to a trademark complaint from Proview International, the owner of the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name in China. Proview has now asked the Chinese government to block the import and export of the popular tablet, reports Bloomberg. &#8220;We are applying to customs to stop any trademark- infringing products from imports to China and also for exports,” said Roger Xie, a lawyer representing Proview. &#8220;Apple wants to postpone and continue infringement of the iPad in China.” Apple maintains that it has purchased rights to the iPad name in 10 countries from Proview, including in China. &#8220;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China,” said Carolyn Wu, Apple’s Beijing-based spokeswoman. &#8220;Our case is still]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe"><img class="size-full wp-image-117999 aligncenter" title="ipad-2-closeup" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ipad-2-closeup.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="489" /></a></center>
<p>On Monday, <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/">Chinese officials seized 45 iPads</a> in response to a trademark complaint from Proview International, the owner of the &#8220;iPad&#8221; name in China. Proview has now asked the Chinese government to block the import and export of the popular tablet, reports <em>Bloomberg</em>. &#8220;We are applying to customs to stop any trademark- infringing products from imports to China and also for exports,” said Roger Xie, a lawyer representing Proview. &#8220;Apple wants to postpone and continue infringement of the iPad in China.” Apple maintains that it has purchased rights to the iPad name in 10 countries from Proview, including in China. &#8220;Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China,” said Carolyn Wu, Apple’s Beijing-based spokeswoman. &#8220;Our case is still pending in mainland China.” The iPad is manufactured by Foxconn in Brazil and in China, so an export ban on the popular tablet would have significant ramifications for Apple.<span id="more-127065"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-14/proview-asks-china-customs-to-stop-ipad-imports-exports.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/14/chinese-firm-looks-to-block-ipad-sales-across-the-globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-closeup-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ipad-2-closeup-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese authorities seize iPads over trademark infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview International Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=126787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese officials seized 45 iPads in response to a trademark complaint filed recently by Proview International Holdings over the iPad name, reports the Hebei Youth Daily. The tablets were seized from store locations within Shijiazhuang, the capital of the Hebei province in northern China. In April 2010, Apple sued Proview claiming ownership of the iPad trademark in China. On November 17th, however, the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court rejected Apple’s claims, leading the Cupertino-based company to appeal the ruling to the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong province. Proview registered the iPad trademark in various countries as early as 2000, with the the Shenzhen-based unit having registered the trademark in China in 2001. Apple began selling the iPad in China in 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement"><img class="size-full wp-image-61347 aligncenter" title="Apple Store China" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></center>
<p>Chinese officials seized 45 iPads in response to a trademark complaint filed recently by Proview International Holdings over the iPad name, reports the <em>Hebei Youth Daily</em>. The tablets were seized from store locations within Shijiazhuang, the capital of the Hebei province in northern China. In April 2010, Apple sued Proview claiming ownership of the iPad trademark in China. On November 17th, however, the <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/07/apple-loses-ipad-trademark-suit-in-china-could-owe-1-5-billion-in-damages/">Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court rejected Apple’s claims</a>, leading the Cupertino-based company to appeal the ruling to the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong province. Proview registered the iPad trademark in various countries as early as 2000, with the the Shenzhen-based unit having registered the trademark in China in 2001. Apple began selling the iPad in China in 2010.<span id="more-126787"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-13/apple-ipads-seized-in-infringement-case-hebei-youth-daily-says.html">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/13/chinese-authorities-seize-ipads-over-trademark-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/appleretail-090128-2-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung files trademarks for &#8216;Samsung Joy&#8217; and &#8216;Samsung Fresh&#8217; smartphones</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/samsung-files-trademarks-for-samsung-joy-and-samsung-fresh-smartphones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/samsung-files-trademarks-for-samsung-joy-and-samsung-fresh-smartphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Graziano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=123275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 13th, Samsung filed trademarks for “Samsung Joy” and “Samsung Fresh.” Both trademarks were registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and labeled as “telephones; smart phones; mobile phones; computer software for mobile phones, portable media players and handheld computers.” No other details were given, but we could certainly see related announcements at next month&#8217;s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain. [Via MobileSyrup] Read [Joy], Read [Fresh]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/samsung-files-trademarks-for-samsung-joy-and-samsung-fresh-smartphones"><img class="size-large wp-image-115981 aligncenter" title="samsung-sign110908175716" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/samsung-sign110908175716-645x431.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="431" /></a></center>
<p>On January 13th, Samsung filed trademarks for “Samsung Joy” and “Samsung Fresh.” Both trademarks were registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and labeled as “telephones; smart phones; mobile phones; computer software for mobile phones, portable media players and handheld computers.” No other details were given, but we could certainly see related announcements at next month&#8217;s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain. <span id="more-123275"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/01/19/samsung-files-trademarks-for-samsung-joy-and-samsung-fresh/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mobilesyrup+%28mobilesyrup.com%29">MobileSyrup</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=85515853">Read</a> [Joy], <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=85515850">Read</a> [Fresh]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2012/01/19/samsung-files-trademarks-for-samsung-joy-and-samsung-fresh-smartphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hasbro sues Asus for naming its tablet the &#8216;Transformer Prime&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/22/hasbro-sues-asus-for-naming-its-tablet-the-transformer-prime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/22/hasbro-sues-asus-for-naming-its-tablet-the-transformer-prime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformer Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=117686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toymaker Hasbro recently filed a lawsuit against Asus for naming its new convertible Android tablet the &#8220;Transformer Prime.&#8221; According to The Verge, Hasbro has a pending trademark for &#8220;Transformers Prime,&#8221; which it used in 2010 for an animated television series. The company also owns four other trademarks related to the &#8220;Transformers&#8221; name. Hasbro said in a statement that it filed the lawsuit to &#8220;aggressively protect its brands,&#8221; but it doesn&#8217;t appear that the company is seeking an injunction against the Asus Transformer Prime tablet just yet. Asus has 21 days to respond and it has not yet issued a statement on the matter. Read]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/22/hasbro-sues-asus-for-naming-its-tablet-the-transformer-prime"><img class="size-full wp-image-117689 aligncenter" title="TransformersWallpaper21024" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/TransformersWallpaper21024.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="389" /></a></center>
<p>Toymaker Hasbro recently filed a lawsuit against Asus for naming its new convertible Android tablet the &#8220;<a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/12/asus-transformer-prime-launch-delayed-indefinitely-report-says/">Transformer Prime</a>.&#8221; According to <em>The Verge</em>, Hasbro has a pending trademark for &#8220;Transformers Prime,&#8221; which it used in 2010 for an animated television series. The company also owns four other trademarks related to the &#8220;Transformers&#8221; name. Hasbro said<em> </em>in a statement that it filed the lawsuit to &#8220;aggressively protect its brands,&#8221; but it doesn&#8217;t appear that the company is seeking an injunction against the Asus Transformer Prime tablet just yet. Asus has 21 days to respond and it has not yet issued a statement on the matter.<span id="more-117686"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/21/2653920/hasbro-sues-asus-over-transformer-prime-tablet">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/22/hasbro-sues-asus-for-naming-its-tablet-the-transformer-prime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/TransformersWallpaper21024-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/TransformersWallpaper21024-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple loses iPad trademark suit in China, could owe $1.5 billion in damages</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/07/apple-loses-ipad-trademark-suit-in-china-could-owe-1-5-billion-in-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/07/apple-loses-ipad-trademark-suit-in-china-could-owe-1-5-billion-in-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=115551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple recently lost a trademark suit in China after it attempted to sue a Chinese firm for infringing on its iPad trademark. Apple originally filed a complaint against Proview Technology, which argued that it registered for the iPad trademark in 2000, long before Apple introduced the tablet. Proview Technology says it continues to use the iPad moniker in China and several other countries and is now seeking $1.5 billion in compensation from Apple. The iPhone maker has six Apple Stores in China and, according to Reuters, executives believe they have just &#8220;scratched the surface&#8221; in terms of the sales potential that the Chinese market will offer. The company plans to open more stores to help fight a growing outcrop of fake Apple]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/07/apple-loses-ipad-trademark-suit-in-china-could-owe-1-5-billion-in-damages"><img class="size-full wp-image-113278 aligncenter" title="apple-ipad-close-up" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/apple-ipad-close-up.jpeg" alt="" width="652" height="489" /></a></center>
<p>Apple recently lost a trademark suit in China after it attempted to sue a Chinese firm for infringing on its iPad trademark. Apple originally filed a complaint against Proview Technology, which argued that it registered for the iPad trademark in 2000, long before Apple introduced the tablet. Proview Technology says it continues to use the iPad moniker in China and several other countries and is now seeking $1.5 billion in compensation from Apple. The iPhone maker has six Apple Stores in China and, according to <em>Reuters</em>, executives believe they have just &#8220;scratched the surface&#8221; in terms of the sales potential that the Chinese market will offer. The company plans to open more stores to help fight a growing outcrop of fake <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/11/china-uncovers-22-additional-fake-apple-stores/">Apple Store locations</a> and, as such, it is important for Apple to be able to use the iPad trademark in the country.</p>
<p><span id="more-115551"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/06/us-apple-china-idUSTRE7B52EB20111206?irpc=932">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/07/apple-loses-ipad-trademark-suit-in-china-could-owe-1-5-billion-in-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/apple-ipad-close-up-128x128.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/apple-ipad-close-up-128x128.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iCloud Communications sues Apple over &#8216;iCloud&#8217; trademark</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/13/icloud-communications-sues-apple-over-icloud-trademark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/13/icloud-communications-sues-apple-over-icloud-trademark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Haselton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iAd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mighty mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=93375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A firm named iCloud Communications has filed a lawsuit against Apple over its &#8220;iCloud&#8221; trademark. Apple announced the new cloud storage and sync service dubbed iCloud during its WWDC keynote last week, and iCloud Communications now wants the Cupertino-based tech giant to get rid of &#8220;all labels, signs, prints, insignia, letterhead, brochures, business cards, invoices and any other written or recorded material or advertisements&#8221; referring to the service. The company argues that Apple&#8217;s iCloud service is closely related to iCloud Communications&#8217; business: The goods and services with which Apple intends to use the “iCloud” mark are identical to or closely related to the goods and services that have been offered by iCloud Communications under the iCloud Marks since its formation in 2005.  However, due]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/13/icloud-communications-sues-apple-over-icloud-trademark"><img class="size-full wp-image-85105 aligncenter" title="court-judge-gavel" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/court-judge-gavel110413120916.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="434" /></a></center>
<p>A firm named iCloud Communications has filed a lawsuit against Apple over its &#8220;iCloud&#8221; trademark. Apple announced the new cloud storage and sync service dubbed iCloud <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/06/apple-icloud-coming-today-replaces-mobileme/">during its WWDC keynote last week</a>, and iCloud Communications now wants the Cupertino-based tech giant to get rid of &#8220;all labels, signs, prints, insignia, letterhead, brochures, business  cards, invoices and any other written or recorded material or  advertisements&#8221; referring to the service. The company argues that Apple&#8217;s iCloud service is closely related to iCloud Communications&#8217; business:</p>
<blockquote><p>The goods and services with which Apple intends to use the “iCloud”  mark are identical to or closely related to the goods and services that  have been offered by iCloud Communications under the iCloud Marks since  its formation in 2005.  However, due to the worldwide media coverage  given to and generated by Apple’s announcement of its “iCloud” services  and the ensuing saturation advertising campaign pursued by Apple, the  media and the general public have quickly come to associate the mark  “iCloud” with Apple, rather than iCloud Communications.</p></blockquote>
<p>iCloud Communications said that Apple consistently uses trademarks owned by others, and references other legal battles over trademarks for the iPhone, iAd, Mighty Mouse, iPad, and even the name Apple itself. The company is asking for &#8220;all monetary damages sustained and to be  sustained &#8230; including lost profits and reasonable royalties,&#8221; as well as &#8220;all profits, gains and advantages obtained from Apple&#8217;s  unlawful conduct,&#8221; in damages. <span id="more-93375"></span></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/12/icloud-communications-sues-apple-for-obvious-reasons/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/06/10/apple-sued-by-icloud-communications-over-icloud-trademark/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/06/13/icloud-communications-sues-apple-over-icloud-trademark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/court-judge-gavel110413120916-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/court-judge-gavel110413120916-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s lawyers demand access to iPhone 5, iPad 3</title>
		<link>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/30/samsungs-lawyers-demand-access-to-iphone-5-ipad-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/30/samsungs-lawyers-demand-access-to-iphone-5-ipad-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Epstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgr.com/?p=91430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a federal judge ordered Samsung to grant Apple access to several unreleased devices last week, the Korean electronics giant responded by demanding the same access to Apple&#8217;s unannounced iPhone 5 and iPad 3. Apple and Samsung are currently tied up in a legal battle surrounding Apple&#8217;s claims that several new Samsung devices &#8220;copy Apple’s technology, user interface and innovative style.&#8221; A judge granted Apple access to Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S II, Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, and DROID Charge in order to help the company determine whether or not to request an early injunction. In turn, Samsung&#8217;s lawyers on Friday filed a motion requesting access to Apple&#8217;s next-generation iPhone and iPad. Samsung claims it needs to examine the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/30/samsungs-lawyers-demand-access-to-iphone-5-ipad-3"><img class="size-full wp-image-69250 aligncenter" title="iphone-4" src="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/iphone-4.jpg" alt="" width="652" height="388" /></a></center>
<p>After <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/24/samsung-ordered-by-court-to-give-apple-access-to-unreleased-products/">a federal judge ordered Samsung to grant Apple access to several unreleased devices</a> last week, the Korean electronics giant responded by demanding the same access to Apple&#8217;s unannounced iPhone 5 and iPad 3. Apple and Samsung are currently <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/18/apple-sues-samsung-over-galaxy-s-galaxy-tab-and-more/">tied up in a legal battle</a> surrounding Apple&#8217;s claims that several new Samsung devices &#8220;copy Apple’s technology, user interface and innovative style.&#8221; A judge granted Apple access to Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S II, Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, and DROID Charge in order to help the company determine whether or not to request an early injunction. In turn, Samsung&#8217;s lawyers on Friday filed a motion requesting access to Apple&#8217;s next-generation iPhone and iPad. Samsung claims it needs to examine the devices in order to evaluate any possible similarities so it can prepare for possible further legal action from Apple. The judge has not yet determined whether or not Samsung will be granted access to the devices.<span id="more-91430"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://thisismynext.com/2011/05/28/samsung-apple-iphone-5-ipad-3/">Read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bgr.com/2011/05/30/samsungs-lawyers-demand-access-to-iphone-5-ipad-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/iphone-4110530124524-80x80.jpg">http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/iphone-4110530124524-80x80.jpg</media:thumbnail>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: www-bgr-com.vimg.net

Served from: www.bgr.com @ 2012-06-01 18:00:33 -->
